TSTP Solution File: SEU190+2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SEU190+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:30:49 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 837.47s 109.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 837.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 171 ( 48 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 215 ( 86 ~; 99 |; 17 &)
% ( 7 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 108 ( 7 sgn; 45 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d10_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> ( in(X3,X1)
& X3 = X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OPC7LuzMGt/E---3.1_6079.p',d10_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(identity_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OPC7LuzMGt/E---3.1_6079.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OPC7LuzMGt/E---3.1_6079.p',d5_relat_1) ).
fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OPC7LuzMGt/E---3.1_6079.p',d4_relat_1) ).
fof(t20_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
& in(X2,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OPC7LuzMGt/E---3.1_6079.p',t20_relat_1) ).
fof(t2_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
<=> in(X3,X2) )
=> X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OPC7LuzMGt/E---3.1_6079.p',t2_tarski) ).
fof(t71_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1
& relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OPC7LuzMGt/E---3.1_6079.p',t71_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X27,X28,X29,X30,X31,X32] :
( ( in(X29,X27)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X29,X30),X28)
| X28 != identity_relation(X27)
| ~ relation(X28) )
& ( X29 = X30
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X29,X30),X28)
| X28 != identity_relation(X27)
| ~ relation(X28) )
& ( ~ in(X31,X27)
| X31 != X32
| in(ordered_pair(X31,X32),X28)
| X28 != identity_relation(X27)
| ~ relation(X28) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X27,X28),esk6_2(X27,X28)),X28)
| ~ in(esk5_2(X27,X28),X27)
| esk5_2(X27,X28) != esk6_2(X27,X28)
| X28 = identity_relation(X27)
| ~ relation(X28) )
& ( in(esk5_2(X27,X28),X27)
| in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X27,X28),esk6_2(X27,X28)),X28)
| X28 = identity_relation(X27)
| ~ relation(X28) )
& ( esk5_2(X27,X28) = esk6_2(X27,X28)
| in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X27,X28),esk6_2(X27,X28)),X28)
| X28 = identity_relation(X27)
| ~ relation(X28) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_relat_1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X35] : relation(identity_relation(X35)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X12,X13,X14,X16] :
( ( ~ in(X10,X9)
| in(ordered_pair(esk2_3(X8,X9,X10),X10),X8)
| X9 != relation_rng(X8)
| ~ relation(X8) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X13,X12),X8)
| in(X12,X9)
| X9 != relation_rng(X8)
| ~ relation(X8) )
& ( ~ in(esk3_2(X8,X14),X14)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X16,esk3_2(X8,X14)),X8)
| X14 = relation_rng(X8)
| ~ relation(X8) )
& ( in(esk3_2(X8,X14),X14)
| in(ordered_pair(esk4_2(X8,X14),esk3_2(X8,X14)),X8)
| X14 = relation_rng(X8)
| ~ relation(X8) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X4)
| X4 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
relation(identity_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk2_3(X3,X2,X1),X1),X3)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_rng(X3)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
| X3 != identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X36,X37,X38,X40,X41,X42,X44] :
( ( ~ in(X38,X37)
| in(ordered_pair(X38,esk7_3(X36,X37,X38)),X36)
| X37 != relation_dom(X36)
| ~ relation(X36) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X40,X41),X36)
| in(X40,X37)
| X37 != relation_dom(X36)
| ~ relation(X36) )
& ( ~ in(esk8_2(X36,X42),X42)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk8_2(X36,X42),X44),X36)
| X42 = relation_dom(X36)
| ~ relation(X36) )
& ( in(esk8_2(X36,X42),X42)
| in(ordered_pair(esk8_2(X36,X42),esk9_2(X36,X42)),X36)
| X42 = relation_dom(X36)
| ~ relation(X36) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),identity_relation(X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk2_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),X2),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),identity_relation(X3)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk7_3(X3,X2,X1)),X3)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_dom(X3)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_19,lemma,
! [X20,X21,X22] :
( ( in(X20,relation_dom(X22))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X20,X21),X22)
| ~ relation(X22) )
& ( in(X21,relation_rng(X22))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X20,X21),X22)
| ~ relation(X22) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X4)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X4 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( in(esk2_3(identity_relation(X1),relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2),X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_rng(identity_relation(X1))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( esk2_3(identity_relation(X1),relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2) = X2
| ~ in(X2,relation_rng(identity_relation(X1))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),c_0_11])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X56,X57] :
( ( ~ in(esk11_2(X56,X57),X56)
| ~ in(esk11_2(X56,X57),X57)
| X56 = X57 )
& ( in(esk11_2(X56,X57),X56)
| in(esk11_2(X56,X57),X57)
| X56 = X57 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_tarski])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk7_3(X2,relation_dom(X2),X1)),X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),identity_relation(X2))
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1
& relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)) = X1 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t71_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(identity_relation(X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X1)
| in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(identity_relation(X2))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_24]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_rng(identity_relation(X2)))
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_dom(identity_relation(X2)))
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_26]),c_0_11])]) ).
fof(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(identity_relation(esk1_0)) != esk1_0
| relation_rng(identity_relation(esk1_0)) != esk1_0 ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( in(esk11_2(X1,relation_rng(identity_relation(X2))),X2)
| X1 = relation_rng(identity_relation(X2))
| in(esk11_2(X1,relation_rng(identity_relation(X2))),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( in(esk11_2(X1,relation_dom(identity_relation(X2))),X2)
| X1 = relation_dom(identity_relation(X2))
| in(esk11_2(X1,relation_dom(identity_relation(X2))),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,lemma,
( X1 = relation_rng(identity_relation(X2))
| ~ in(esk11_2(X1,relation_rng(identity_relation(X2))),X1)
| ~ in(esk11_2(X1,relation_rng(identity_relation(X2))),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,lemma,
( X1 = relation_dom(identity_relation(X2))
| ~ in(esk11_2(X1,relation_dom(identity_relation(X2))),X1)
| ~ in(esk11_2(X1,relation_dom(identity_relation(X2))),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(identity_relation(esk1_0)) != esk1_0
| relation_rng(identity_relation(esk1_0)) != esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
$false,
inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37,c_0_38,c_0_39,c_0_40]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SEU190+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 09:29:06 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.52 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OPC7LuzMGt/E---3.1_6079.p
% 837.47/109.21 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 837.47/109.21 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 837.47/109.21 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # new_bool_1 with pid 6158 completed with status 0
% 837.47/109.21 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 837.47/109.21 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 837.47/109.21 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 837.47/109.21 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 837.47/109.21 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 28s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 6161 completed with status 7
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting new_bool_1 with 31s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # new_bool_1 with pid 6172 completed with status 7
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 28s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 6181 completed with status 7
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 28s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 6186 completed with status 0
% 837.47/109.21 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 837.47/109.21 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 837.47/109.21 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 837.47/109.21 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 837.47/109.21 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 28s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 6161 completed with status 7
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting new_bool_1 with 31s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # new_bool_1 with pid 6172 completed with status 7
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 28s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 6181 completed with status 7
% 837.47/109.21 # Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 28s (1) cores
% 837.47/109.21 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 837.47/109.21 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 837.47/109.21 # SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 837.47/109.21
% 837.47/109.21 # Proof found!
% 837.47/109.21 # SZS status Theorem
% 837.47/109.21 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 837.47/109.21 # Parsed axioms : 174
% 837.47/109.21 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 111
% 837.47/109.21 # Initial clauses : 113
% 837.47/109.21 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 837.47/109.21 # Initial clauses in saturation : 113
% 837.47/109.21 # Processed clauses : 69764
% 837.47/109.21 # ...of these trivial : 34
% 837.47/109.21 # ...subsumed : 64730
% 837.47/109.21 # ...remaining for further processing : 5000
% 837.47/109.21 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 546
% 837.47/109.21 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 837.47/109.21 # Backward-subsumed : 484
% 837.47/109.21 # Backward-rewritten : 18
% 837.47/109.21 # Generated clauses : 1410840
% 837.47/109.21 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1215933
% 837.47/109.21 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 837.47/109.21 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 398
% 837.47/109.21 # Paramodulations : 1410256
% 837.47/109.21 # Factorizations : 38
% 837.47/109.21 # NegExts : 0
% 837.47/109.21 # Equation resolutions : 548
% 837.47/109.21 # Total rewrite steps : 2148497
% 837.47/109.21 # Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 837.47/109.22 # Propositional check models : 0
% 837.47/109.22 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 837.47/109.22 # Propositional clauses : 1146425
% 837.47/109.22 # Propositional clauses after purity: 178521
% 837.47/109.22 # Propositional unsat core size : 5
% 837.47/109.22 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 837.47/109.22 # Propositional encoding time : 2.128
% 837.47/109.22 # Propositional solver time : 0.555
% 837.47/109.22 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 837.47/109.22 # Success case prop encoding time : 2.128
% 837.47/109.22 # Success case prop solver time : 0.555
% 837.47/109.22 # Current number of processed clauses : 4382
% 837.47/109.22 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 50
% 837.47/109.22 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 837.47/109.22 # Negative unit clauses : 1645
% 837.47/109.22 # Non-unit-clauses : 2687
% 837.47/109.22 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1142043
% 837.47/109.22 # ...number of literals in the above : 3899061
% 837.47/109.22 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 837.47/109.22 # Current number of archived clauses : 600
% 837.47/109.22 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2273720
% 837.47/109.22 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1477604
% 837.47/109.22 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 32908
% 837.47/109.22 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 301690
% 837.47/109.22 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 837.47/109.22 # BW rewrite match attempts : 47
% 837.47/109.22 # BW rewrite match successes : 15
% 837.47/109.22 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 837.47/109.22 # Condensation successes : 0
% 837.47/109.22 # Termbank termtop insertions : 41897760
% 837.47/109.22
% 837.47/109.22 # -------------------------------------------------
% 837.47/109.22 # User time : 102.299 s
% 837.47/109.22 # System time : 2.231 s
% 837.47/109.22 # Total time : 104.530 s
% 837.47/109.22 # Maximum resident set size: 2176 pages
% 837.47/109.22
% 837.47/109.22 # -------------------------------------------------
% 837.47/109.22 # User time : 102.306 s
% 837.47/109.22 # System time : 2.235 s
% 837.47/109.22 # Total time : 104.541 s
% 837.47/109.22 # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 837.47/109.22 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------