TSTP Solution File: SEU188+2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SEU188+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.27s 1.46s
% Output : Refutation 1.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 13 unt; 1 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
relation(skc5),
file('SEU188+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
empty(empty_set),
file('SEU188+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(14,axiom,
~ equal(empty_set,skc5),
file('SEU188+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(52,axiom,
( ~ empty(u)
| equal(u,empty_set) ),
file('SEU188+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(69,axiom,
( equal(relation_rng(skc5),empty_set)
| equal(relation_dom(skc5),empty_set) ),
file('SEU188+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(99,axiom,
( ~ relation(u)
| ~ empty(relation_dom(u))
| empty(u) ),
file('SEU188+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(100,axiom,
( ~ relation(u)
| ~ empty(relation_rng(u))
| empty(u) ),
file('SEU188+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(324,plain,
( ~ empty(relation_dom(skc5))
| empty(skc5) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,99]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,99.0')] ).
cnf(325,plain,
( ~ empty(relation_rng(skc5))
| empty(skc5) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,100]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,100.0')] ).
cnf(378,plain,
~ empty(skc5),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[52,14]),
[iquote('0:Res:52.1,14.0')] ).
cnf(396,plain,
~ empty(relation_dom(skc5)),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[324,378]),
[iquote('0:MRR:324.1,378.0')] ).
cnf(397,plain,
~ empty(relation_rng(skc5)),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[325,378]),
[iquote('0:MRR:325.1,378.0')] ).
cnf(483,plain,
equal(relation_rng(skc5),empty_set),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[69]),
[iquote('1:Spt:69.0')] ).
cnf(488,plain,
~ empty(empty_set),
inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[483,397]),
[iquote('1:Rew:483.0,397.0')] ).
cnf(502,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[488,3]),
[iquote('1:MRR:488.0,3.0')] ).
cnf(511,plain,
~ equal(relation_rng(skc5),empty_set),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(sa)])],[502,483]),
[iquote('1:Spt:502.0,69.0,483.0')] ).
cnf(512,plain,
equal(relation_dom(skc5),empty_set),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[69]),
[iquote('1:Spt:502.0,69.1')] ).
cnf(516,plain,
~ empty(empty_set),
inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[512,396]),
[iquote('1:Rew:512.0,396.0')] ).
cnf(523,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[516,3]),
[iquote('1:MRR:516.0,3.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SEU188+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 23:06:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.27/1.46
% 1.27/1.46 SPASS V 3.9
% 1.27/1.46 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.27/1.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.27/1.46 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.46 SPASS derived 208 clauses, backtracked 22 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 429 clauses.
% 1.27/1.46 SPASS allocated 104391 KBytes.
% 1.27/1.46 SPASS spent 0:00:01.11 on the problem.
% 1.27/1.46 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.27/1.46 0:00:00.97 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.27/1.46 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 1.27/1.46 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.27/1.46 0:00:00.03 for the reduction.
% 1.27/1.46
% 1.27/1.46
% 1.27/1.46 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 19 :
% 1.27/1.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.46 Formulae used in the proof : t64_relat_1 fc4_relat_1 t6_boole fc5_relat_1 fc6_relat_1
% 1.27/1.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------