TSTP Solution File: SEU187+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU187+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.31s 2.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  12 unt;   2 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   52 (  22 equ;  34 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_266,lemma,
    ( set_difference(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)) != X1
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bp4sjufa/lgb.p',i_0_266) ).

cnf(i_0_254,plain,
    set_difference(empty_set,X1) = empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bp4sjufa/lgb.p',i_0_254) ).

cnf(i_0_67,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk19_3(X2,X3,X1)),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),X2)
    | X3 != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bp4sjufa/lgb.p',i_0_67) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bp4sjufa/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_140,plain,
    relation(empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bp4sjufa/lgb.p',i_0_140) ).

cnf(i_0_84,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk26_3(X1,X2,X3),X3),unordered_pair(esk26_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bp4sjufa/lgb.p',i_0_84) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk8_1(X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bp4sjufa/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_262,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom(empty_set) != empty_set
    | relation_rng(empty_set) != empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bp4sjufa/lgb.p',i_0_262) ).

cnf(c_0_275,lemma,
    ( set_difference(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)) != X1
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_266 ).

cnf(c_0_276,plain,
    set_difference(empty_set,X1) = empty_set,
    i_0_254 ).

cnf(c_0_277,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk19_3(X2,X3,X1)),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),X2)
    | X3 != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_67 ).

cnf(c_0_278,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_279,lemma,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_275,c_0_276]) ).

cnf(c_0_280,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,esk19_3(X2,X3,X1))),X2)
    | X3 != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_277,c_0_278]) ).

cnf(c_0_281,plain,
    relation(empty_set),
    i_0_140 ).

cnf(c_0_282,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk26_3(X1,X2,X3),X3),unordered_pair(esk26_3(X1,X2,X3),esk26_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_84 ).

cnf(c_0_283,plain,
    ( X1 != relation_dom(empty_set)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_279,c_0_280]),c_0_281])]) ).

cnf(c_0_284,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk26_3(X2,X3,X1)),unordered_pair(esk26_3(X2,X3,X1),esk26_3(X2,X3,X1))),X2)
    | X3 != relation_rng(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_282,c_0_278]) ).

cnf(c_0_285,plain,
    ~ in(X1,relation_dom(empty_set)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_283]) ).

cnf(c_0_286,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk8_1(X1),X1) ),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_287,plain,
    ( X1 != relation_rng(empty_set)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_279,c_0_284]),c_0_281])]) ).

cnf(c_0_288,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom(empty_set) != empty_set
    | relation_rng(empty_set) != empty_set ),
    i_0_262 ).

cnf(c_0_289,plain,
    relation_dom(empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_285,c_0_286]) ).

cnf(c_0_290,plain,
    ~ in(X1,relation_rng(empty_set)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_287]) ).

cnf(c_0_291,negated_conjecture,
    relation_rng(empty_set) != empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_288,c_0_289])]) ).

cnf(c_0_292,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_290,c_0_286]),c_0_291]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SEU187+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 01:57:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.31/2.36  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.31/2.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.31/2.36  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.31/2.36  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 7.31/2.36  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.31/2.36  #
% 7.31/2.36  # Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 7.31/2.36  
% 7.31/2.36  # Proof found!
% 7.31/2.36  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.31/2.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.31/2.36  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.31/2.36  
% 7.31/2.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.31/2.36  # User time                : 0.038 s
% 7.31/2.36  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.31/2.36  # Total time               : 0.045 s
% 7.31/2.36  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.31/2.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------