TSTP Solution File: SEU186+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU186+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.67s 2.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 10 unt; 2 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 9 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_259,negated_conjecture,
~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),esk48_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w10wasd6/input.p',i_0_259) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w10wasd6/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)),unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2))) = X2
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w10wasd6/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_25,plain,
( X1 = empty_set
| in(esk8_1(X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w10wasd6/input.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(i_0_258,negated_conjecture,
esk48_0 != empty_set,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w10wasd6/input.p',i_0_258) ).
cnf(i_0_260,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk48_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w10wasd6/input.p',i_0_260) ).
cnf(c_0_267,negated_conjecture,
~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),esk48_0),
i_0_259 ).
cnf(c_0_268,plain,
unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_269,plain,
( unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2)),unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2))) = X2
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_270,negated_conjecture,
~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),esk48_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_267,c_0_268]) ).
cnf(c_0_271,plain,
( unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)),unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2))) = X2
| ~ in(X2,X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_269,c_0_268]) ).
cnf(c_0_272,plain,
( ~ in(X1,esk48_0)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_270,c_0_271]) ).
cnf(c_0_273,plain,
( X1 = empty_set
| in(esk8_1(X1),X1) ),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_274,negated_conjecture,
esk48_0 != empty_set,
i_0_258 ).
cnf(c_0_275,plain,
( ~ in(esk8_1(esk48_0),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_272,c_0_273]),c_0_274]) ).
cnf(c_0_276,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk48_0),
i_0_260 ).
cnf(c_0_277,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_275,c_0_273]),c_0_276])]),c_0_274]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SEU186+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 03:06:46 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.67/2.42 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.67/2.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.67/2.42 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.67/2.42 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 8.67/2.42 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.67/2.42 #
% 8.67/2.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 8.67/2.42
% 8.67/2.42 # Proof found!
% 8.67/2.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.67/2.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.67/2.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.67/2.42
% 8.67/2.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.67/2.42 # User time : 0.139 s
% 8.67/2.42 # System time : 0.010 s
% 8.67/2.42 # Total time : 0.149 s
% 8.67/2.42 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.67/2.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------