TSTP Solution File: SEU185+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SEU185+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:25:08 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 498.56s 64.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 498.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  255 (  65 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   38 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  368 ( 158   ~; 166   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   2 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  144 (   2 sgn;  58   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d8_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( relation(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( relation(X3)
             => ( X3 = relation_composition(X1,X2)
              <=> ! [X4,X5] :
                    ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
                  <=> ? [X6] :
                        ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1)
                        & in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0ChfYqapsQ/E---3.1_9262.p',d8_relat_1) ).

fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
            <=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0ChfYqapsQ/E---3.1_9262.p',d5_relat_1) ).

fof(t47_relat_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( relation(X2)
         => ( subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X2))
           => relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X1)) = relation_rng(X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0ChfYqapsQ/E---3.1_9262.p',t47_relat_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0ChfYqapsQ/E---3.1_9262.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
            <=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0ChfYqapsQ/E---3.1_9262.p',d4_relat_1) ).

fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & relation(X2) )
     => relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0ChfYqapsQ/E---3.1_9262.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).

fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0ChfYqapsQ/E---3.1_9262.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(t45_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( relation(X2)
         => subset(relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X2)),relation_rng(X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0ChfYqapsQ/E---3.1_9262.p',t45_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25,X27,X28,X29,X32] :
      ( ( in(ordered_pair(X24,esk6_5(X21,X22,X23,X24,X25)),X21)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),X23)
        | X23 != relation_composition(X21,X22)
        | ~ relation(X23)
        | ~ relation(X22)
        | ~ relation(X21) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk6_5(X21,X22,X23,X24,X25),X25),X22)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),X23)
        | X23 != relation_composition(X21,X22)
        | ~ relation(X23)
        | ~ relation(X22)
        | ~ relation(X21) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X27,X29),X21)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X29,X28),X22)
        | in(ordered_pair(X27,X28),X23)
        | X23 != relation_composition(X21,X22)
        | ~ relation(X23)
        | ~ relation(X22)
        | ~ relation(X21) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk7_3(X21,X22,X23),esk8_3(X21,X22,X23)),X23)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk7_3(X21,X22,X23),X32),X21)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X32,esk8_3(X21,X22,X23)),X22)
        | X23 = relation_composition(X21,X22)
        | ~ relation(X23)
        | ~ relation(X22)
        | ~ relation(X21) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk7_3(X21,X22,X23),esk9_3(X21,X22,X23)),X21)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk7_3(X21,X22,X23),esk8_3(X21,X22,X23)),X23)
        | X23 = relation_composition(X21,X22)
        | ~ relation(X23)
        | ~ relation(X22)
        | ~ relation(X21) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk9_3(X21,X22,X23),esk8_3(X21,X22,X23)),X22)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk7_3(X21,X22,X23),esk8_3(X21,X22,X23)),X23)
        | X23 = relation_composition(X21,X22)
        | ~ relation(X23)
        | ~ relation(X22)
        | ~ relation(X21) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_relat_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11,X13,X14,X15,X17] :
      ( ( ~ in(X11,X10)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X9,X10,X11),X11),X9)
        | X10 != relation_rng(X9)
        | ~ relation(X9) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X14,X13),X9)
        | in(X13,X10)
        | X10 != relation_rng(X9)
        | ~ relation(X9) )
      & ( ~ in(esk4_2(X9,X15),X15)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X17,esk4_2(X9,X15)),X9)
        | X15 = relation_rng(X9)
        | ~ relation(X9) )
      & ( in(esk4_2(X9,X15),X15)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X9,X15),esk4_2(X9,X15)),X9)
        | X15 = relation_rng(X9)
        | ~ relation(X9) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( relation(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( relation(X2)
           => ( subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X2))
             => relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X1)) = relation_rng(X1) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t47_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),X6)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X4),X5)
    | X6 != relation_composition(X3,X5)
    | ~ relation(X6)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ relation(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X2,X1),X1),X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X38,X39,X40,X41,X42] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X38,X39)
        | ~ in(X40,X38)
        | in(X40,X39) )
      & ( in(esk10_2(X41,X42),X41)
        | subset(X41,X42) )
      & ( ~ in(esk10_2(X41,X42),X42)
        | subset(X41,X42) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk1_0)
    & relation(esk2_0)
    & subset(relation_dom(esk1_0),relation_rng(esk2_0))
    & relation_rng(relation_composition(esk2_0,esk1_0)) != relation_rng(esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X47,X48,X49,X51,X52,X53,X55] :
      ( ( ~ in(X49,X48)
        | in(ordered_pair(X49,esk11_3(X47,X48,X49)),X47)
        | X48 != relation_dom(X47)
        | ~ relation(X47) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X51,X52),X47)
        | in(X51,X48)
        | X48 != relation_dom(X47)
        | ~ relation(X47) )
      & ( ~ in(esk12_2(X47,X53),X53)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk12_2(X47,X53),X55),X47)
        | X53 = relation_dom(X47)
        | ~ relation(X47) )
      & ( in(esk12_2(X47,X53),X53)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk12_2(X47,X53),esk13_2(X47,X53)),X47)
        | X53 = relation_dom(X47)
        | ~ relation(X47) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | X3 != relation_composition(X4,X5)
    | X6 != relation_rng(X5)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,esk3_3(X5,X6,X2)),X4)
    | ~ in(X2,X6) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    subset(relation_dom(esk1_0),relation_rng(esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | X4 != relation_dom(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | X4 != relation_rng(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X2,esk3_3(X3,X4,X5)),X5),X6)
    | X6 != relation_composition(X1,X3)
    | X4 != relation_rng(X3)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ relation(X6)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(esk3_3(X3,X4,X5),X2)
    | ~ in(X5,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,relation_rng(esk2_0))
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( in(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),X4)
    | X4 != relation_dom(X1)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != relation_composition(X4,X5)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | X6 != relation_rng(X5)
    | X7 != relation_rng(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ in(esk3_3(X5,X6,X1),X7)
    | ~ in(X1,X6) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_rng(esk2_0))
    | relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_dom(X1)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X34,X35] :
      ( ~ relation(X34)
      | ~ relation(X35)
      | relation(relation_composition(X34,X35)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | relation_rng(esk2_0) != relation_rng(X3)
    | relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_dom(X4)
    | X5 != relation_composition(X3,X4)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X5)
    | X6 != relation_rng(X4)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X6) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | relation_rng(esk2_0) != relation_rng(X3)
    | relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_dom(X4)
    | X2 != relation_rng(relation_composition(X3,X4))
    | X5 != relation_rng(X4)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X5) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] :
      ( ( subset(X36,X37)
        | X36 != X37 )
      & ( subset(X37,X36)
        | X36 != X37 )
      & ( ~ subset(X36,X37)
        | ~ subset(X37,X36)
        | X36 = X37 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ~ relation(X19)
      | ~ relation(X20)
      | subset(relation_rng(relation_composition(X19,X20)),relation_rng(X20)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t45_relat_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X3)))
    | relation_rng(esk2_0) != relation_rng(X2)
    | relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_dom(X3)
    | X4 != relation_rng(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( in(esk10_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X2)),relation_rng(X2))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk10_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk10_2(X1,X2),relation_rng(relation_composition(X3,X4)))
    | relation_rng(esk2_0) != relation_rng(X3)
    | relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_dom(X4)
    | X1 != relation_rng(X4)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_rng(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(X2),relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X3)))
    | relation_rng(esk2_0) != relation_rng(X2)
    | relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_dom(X3)
    | X1 != relation_rng(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    relation_rng(relation_composition(esk2_0,esk1_0)) != relation_rng(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_rng(X2)
    | relation_rng(esk2_0) != relation_rng(X1)
    | relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem    : SEU185+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 08:30:46 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0ChfYqapsQ/E---3.1_9262.p
% 498.56/64.16  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 498.56/64.16  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 498.56/64.16  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # sh5l with pid 9343 completed with status 0
% 498.56/64.16  # Result found by sh5l
% 498.56/64.16  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 498.56/64.16  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 498.56/64.16  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 498.56/64.16  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 139s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 9346 completed with status 0
% 498.56/64.16  # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 498.56/64.16  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 498.56/64.16  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 498.56/64.16  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 498.56/64.16  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 498.56/64.16  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 139s (1) cores
% 498.56/64.16  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 498.56/64.16  
% 498.56/64.16  # Proof found!
% 498.56/64.16  # SZS status Theorem
% 498.56/64.16  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 498.56/64.16  # Parsed axioms                        : 39
% 498.56/64.16  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10
% 498.56/64.16  # Initial clauses                      : 51
% 498.56/64.16  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 498.56/64.16  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 51
% 498.56/64.16  # Processed clauses                    : 21890
% 498.56/64.16  # ...of these trivial                  : 288
% 498.56/64.16  # ...subsumed                          : 12303
% 498.56/64.16  # ...remaining for further processing  : 9299
% 498.56/64.16  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 498.56/64.16  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 498.56/64.16  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1040
% 498.56/64.16  # Backward-rewritten                   : 66
% 498.56/64.16  # Generated clauses                    : 1346288
% 498.56/64.16  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1324139
% 498.56/64.16  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 498.56/64.16  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 325
% 498.56/64.16  # Paramodulations                      : 1343954
% 498.56/64.16  # Factorizations                       : 33
% 498.56/64.16  # NegExts                              : 0
% 498.56/64.16  # Equation resolutions                 : 2288
% 498.56/64.16  # Total rewrite steps                  : 246266
% 498.56/64.16  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 498.56/64.16  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 498.56/64.16  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 498.56/64.16  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 498.56/64.16  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 498.56/64.16  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 498.56/64.16  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 498.56/64.16  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 498.56/64.16  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 498.56/64.16  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 498.56/64.16  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 498.56/64.16  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 498.56/64.16  # Current number of processed clauses  : 8178
% 498.56/64.16  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 97
% 498.56/64.16  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 498.56/64.16  #    Negative unit clauses             : 40
% 498.56/64.16  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 8040
% 498.56/64.16  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1296661
% 498.56/64.16  # ...number of literals in the above   : 16172749
% 498.56/64.16  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 498.56/64.16  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1119
% 498.56/64.16  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17835268
% 498.56/64.16  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 489561
% 498.56/64.16  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8500
% 498.56/64.16  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69298
% 498.56/64.16  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 498.56/64.16  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 308
% 498.56/64.16  # BW rewrite match successes           : 22
% 498.56/64.16  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 498.56/64.16  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 498.56/64.16  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 43317370
% 498.56/64.16  
% 498.56/64.16  # -------------------------------------------------
% 498.56/64.16  # User time                : 60.889 s
% 498.56/64.16  # System time              : 1.115 s
% 498.56/64.16  # Total time               : 62.004 s
% 498.56/64.16  # Maximum resident set size: 1848 pages
% 498.56/64.16  
% 498.56/64.16  # -------------------------------------------------
% 498.56/64.16  # User time                : 60.893 s
% 498.56/64.16  # System time              : 1.117 s
% 498.56/64.16  # Total time               : 62.010 s
% 498.56/64.16  # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 498.56/64.16  % E---3.1 exiting
% 498.56/64.16  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------