TSTP Solution File: SEU181+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU181+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.40s 28.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 61 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 299 ( 109 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 423 ( 185 ~; 208 |; 14 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 146 ( 10 sgn 42 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d7_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = relation_inverse(X1)
<=> ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d7_relat_1) ).
fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d5_relat_1) ).
fof(t20_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
& in(X2,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t20_relat_1) ).
fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_1) ).
fof(t37_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(relation_inverse(X1))
& relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(relation_inverse(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t37_relat_1) ).
fof(involutiveness_k4_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation_inverse(relation_inverse(X1)) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',involutiveness_k4_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k4_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation(relation_inverse(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k4_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X7,X8] :
( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(X8,X7),X5)
| X6 != relation_inverse(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X8,X7),X5)
| in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != relation_inverse(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X5,X6),esk6_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk6_2(X5,X6),esk5_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_inverse(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X5,X6),esk6_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_2(X5,X6),esk5_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_inverse(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d7_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7),X5)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X7),X5)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X11,esk3_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk4_2(X5,X6),esk3_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(X5,relation_rng(X6))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relat_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(X7,esk7_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
| X6 != relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X9),X5)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk8_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk8_2(X5,X6),X11),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(esk8_2(X5,X6),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk8_2(X5,X6),esk9_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(relation_inverse(X1))
& relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(relation_inverse(X1)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t37_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| X2 != relation_inverse(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),X3),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,lemma,
( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
| in(ordered_pair(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk9_2(X1,X2)),X1)
| in(esk8_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk1_0)
& ( relation_rng(esk1_0) != relation_dom(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_rng(relation_inverse(esk1_0)) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| X2 != relation_inverse(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X3,esk7_3(X1,X2,X3)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
( in(X3,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
| in(ordered_pair(esk4_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)),X1)
| in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk8_2(X1,X2),X3),X1)
| ~ in(esk8_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk2_3(X2,X3,X1)),X4)
| X4 != relation_inverse(X2)
| X3 != relation_rng(X2)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,lemma,
( X1 = relation_dom(X2)
| in(esk8_2(X2,X1),relation_dom(X2))
| in(esk8_2(X2,X1),X1)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,esk3_2(X1,X2)),X1)
| ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk7_3(X1,X2,X3),X3),X4)
| X1 != relation_inverse(X4)
| X2 != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,lemma,
( X1 = relation_rng(X2)
| in(esk3_2(X2,X1),relation_rng(X2))
| in(esk3_2(X2,X1),X1)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( X1 = relation_dom(X2)
| X2 != relation_inverse(X3)
| X4 != relation_rng(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(esk8_2(X2,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk8_2(X2,X1),X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = relation_dom(esk1_0)
| in(esk8_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_dom(esk1_0))
| in(esk8_2(esk1_0,X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( X1 = relation_rng(X2)
| X3 != relation_inverse(X2)
| X4 != relation_dom(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(esk3_2(X2,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk3_2(X2,X1),X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = relation_rng(esk1_0)
| in(esk3_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_rng(esk1_0))
| in(esk3_2(esk1_0,X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = relation_dom(esk1_0)
| in(esk8_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_dom(esk1_0))
| relation_inverse(X2) != esk1_0
| X3 != relation_rng(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(esk8_2(esk1_0,X1),X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = relation_rng(esk1_0)
| in(esk3_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_rng(esk1_0))
| X2 != relation_inverse(esk1_0)
| X3 != relation_dom(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(esk3_2(esk1_0,X1),X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk7_3(X1,X2,X3),X3),X4)
| X4 != relation_inverse(X1)
| X2 != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = relation_dom(esk1_0)
| in(esk8_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_dom(esk1_0))
| relation_inverse(X2) != esk1_0
| X1 != relation_rng(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = relation_rng(esk1_0)
| in(esk3_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_rng(esk1_0))
| X2 != relation_inverse(esk1_0)
| X1 != relation_dom(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
| X2 != relation_inverse(X3)
| X4 != relation_dom(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(esk1_0)
| in(esk8_2(esk1_0,relation_rng(X1)),relation_dom(esk1_0))
| relation_inverse(X1) != esk1_0
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
fof(c_0_39,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ relation(X2)
| relation_inverse(relation_inverse(X2)) = X2 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[involutiveness_k4_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_40,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ relation(X2)
| relation(relation_inverse(X2)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k4_relat_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
| X2 != relation_inverse(X3)
| X4 != relation_rng(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = relation_rng(esk1_0)
| in(esk3_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_rng(esk1_0))
| X1 != relation_dom(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ relation(relation_inverse(esk1_0)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,lemma,
( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(esk1_0)
| in(esk8_2(esk1_0,relation_rng(X1)),relation_rng(X2))
| relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_dom(X3)
| relation_inverse(X1) != esk1_0
| X2 != relation_inverse(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( relation_inverse(relation_inverse(X1)) = X1
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( relation(relation_inverse(X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,lemma,
( X1 = relation_rng(esk1_0)
| in(esk3_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_dom(X2))
| relation_rng(esk1_0) != relation_rng(X3)
| X1 != relation_dom(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| X2 != relation_inverse(X3)
| ~ relation(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( X1 = relation_dom(X2)
| X3 != relation_dom(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(esk8_2(X2,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk8_2(X2,X1),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,lemma,
( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(esk1_0)
| in(esk8_2(esk1_0,relation_rng(X1)),relation_rng(X2))
| relation_dom(relation_inverse(X2)) != relation_dom(esk1_0)
| relation_inverse(X1) != esk1_0
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44])]),c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( X1 = relation_rng(X2)
| X3 != relation_rng(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(esk3_2(X2,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk3_2(X2,X1),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,lemma,
( X1 = relation_rng(esk1_0)
| in(esk3_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_dom(X2))
| relation_rng(relation_inverse(X2)) != relation_rng(esk1_0)
| X1 != relation_dom(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ relation(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_44])]),c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,lemma,
( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(esk1_0)
| relation_dom(relation_inverse(X1)) != relation_dom(esk1_0)
| X2 != relation_dom(esk1_0)
| relation_inverse(X1) != esk1_0
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(esk8_2(esk1_0,relation_rng(X1)),X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,lemma,
( relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(esk1_0)
| relation_rng(relation_inverse(X1)) != relation_rng(esk1_0)
| relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| X2 != relation_rng(esk1_0)
| ~ relation(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(esk3_2(esk1_0,relation_dom(X1)),X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(esk1_0)
| relation_dom(relation_inverse(X1)) != relation_dom(esk1_0)
| relation_inverse(X1) != esk1_0
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(esk1_0)
| relation_rng(relation_inverse(X1)) != relation_rng(esk1_0)
| relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ relation(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_rng(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| relation_rng(esk1_0) != relation_dom(relation_inverse(esk1_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
( relation_rng(relation_inverse(X1)) = relation_dom(esk1_0)
| relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(esk1_0)
| X1 != esk1_0
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_44]),c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(relation_inverse(X1)) = relation_rng(esk1_0)
| relation_dom(relation_inverse(X1)) != relation_dom(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| relation_rng(X1) != relation_rng(esk1_0)
| ~ relation(relation_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_44]),c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom(relation_inverse(esk1_0)) != relation_rng(esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
~ relation(relation_inverse(esk1_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_57]),c_0_24])]),c_0_58]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_45]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU181+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 07:52:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/28.58 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.40/28.58
% 0.40/28.58 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.40/28.58 # OLD status Res
% 0.40/28.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.40/28.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.40/28.58 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.40/28.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.40/28.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.40/28.58
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof found!
% 0.40/28.58 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.40/28.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object total steps : 61
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object clause steps : 46
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object formula steps : 15
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object conjectures : 20
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object clause conjectures : 17
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object initial clauses used : 14
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object generating inferences : 32
% 0.40/28.58 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 21
% 0.40/28.58 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.40/28.58 # Parsed axioms : 154
% 0.40/28.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 143
% 0.40/28.58 # Initial clauses : 24
% 0.40/28.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.40/28.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 24
% 0.40/28.58 # Processed clauses : 5897
% 0.40/28.58 # ...of these trivial : 223
% 0.40/28.58 # ...subsumed : 2934
% 0.40/28.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 2740
% 0.40/28.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 308
% 0.40/28.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.40/28.58 # Backward-subsumed : 109
% 0.40/28.58 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.40/28.58 # Generated clauses : 71282
% 0.40/28.58 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 70676
% 0.40/28.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6767
% 0.40/28.58 # Paramodulations : 70221
% 0.40/28.58 # Factorizations : 16
% 0.40/28.58 # Equation resolutions : 1045
% 0.40/28.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 2631
% 0.40/28.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.40/28.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.40/28.58 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.40/28.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 2626
% 0.40/28.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 60529
% 0.40/28.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 728415
% 0.40/28.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.40/28.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 109
% 0.40/28.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1729652
% 0.40/28.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69638
% 0.40/28.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9810
% 0.40/28.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1041
% 0.40/28.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.40/28.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.40/28.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.40/28.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.40/28.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.40/28.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2611975
% 0.40/28.58
% 0.40/28.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/28.58 # User time : 4.125 s
% 0.40/28.58 # System time : 0.041 s
% 0.40/28.58 # Total time : 4.166 s
% 0.40/28.58 # Maximum resident set size: 75052 pages
% 0.40/46.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/46.42 eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/46.42
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------