TSTP Solution File: SEU180+2 by leanCoP---2.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : leanCoP---2.2
% Problem : SEU180+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 12:00:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.40s 1.40s
% Output : Proof 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU180+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 14:04:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/1.40 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/1.41 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/1.41
% 0.40/1.41 %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/1.41 fof(t30_relat_1, conjecture, ! [_192478, _192481, _192484] : (relation(_192484) => in(ordered_pair(_192478, _192481), _192484) => in(_192478, relation_field(_192484)) & in(_192481, relation_field(_192484))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', t30_relat_1)).
% 0.40/1.41 fof(d2_xboole_0, axiom, ! [_192809, _192812, _192815] : (_192815 = set_union2(_192809, _192812) <=> ! [_192836] : (in(_192836, _192815) <=> in(_192836, _192809) | in(_192836, _192812))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', d2_xboole_0)).
% 0.40/1.41 fof(d6_relat_1, axiom, ! [_193120] : (relation(_193120) => relation_field(_193120) = set_union2(relation_dom(_193120), relation_rng(_193120))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', d6_relat_1)).
% 0.40/1.41 fof(t20_relat_1, lemma, ! [_193368, _193371, _193374] : (relation(_193374) => in(ordered_pair(_193368, _193371), _193374) => in(_193368, relation_dom(_193374)) & in(_193371, relation_rng(_193374))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', t20_relat_1)).
% 0.40/1.41
% 0.40/1.41 cnf(1, plain, [-(relation(45 ^ []))], clausify(t30_relat_1)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf(2, plain, [-(in(ordered_pair(43 ^ [], 44 ^ []), 45 ^ []))], clausify(t30_relat_1)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf(3, plain, [in(43 ^ [], relation_field(45 ^ [])), in(44 ^ [], relation_field(45 ^ []))], clausify(t30_relat_1)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf(4, plain, [_85436 = set_union2(_85297, _85367), -(in(_85600, _85436)), in(_85600, _85297)], clausify(d2_xboole_0)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf(5, plain, [_85436 = set_union2(_85297, _85367), -(in(_85600, _85436)), in(_85600, _85367)], clausify(d2_xboole_0)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf(6, plain, [relation(_91807), -(relation_field(_91807) = set_union2(relation_dom(_91807), relation_rng(_91807)))], clausify(d6_relat_1)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf(7, plain, [relation(_117263), in(ordered_pair(_117128, _117196), _117263), -(in(_117128, relation_dom(_117263)))], clausify(t20_relat_1)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf(8, plain, [relation(_117263), in(ordered_pair(_117128, _117196), _117263), -(in(_117196, relation_rng(_117263)))], clausify(t20_relat_1)).
% 0.40/1.41
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1',plain,[in(43 ^ [], relation_field(45 ^ [])), in(44 ^ [], relation_field(45 ^ []))],start(3)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.1',plain,[-(in(43 ^ [], relation_field(45 ^ []))), relation_field(45 ^ []) = set_union2(relation_dom(45 ^ []), relation_rng(45 ^ [])), in(43 ^ [], relation_dom(45 ^ []))],extension(4,bind([[_85436, _85367, _85600, _85297], [relation_field(45 ^ []), relation_rng(45 ^ []), 43 ^ [], relation_dom(45 ^ [])]]))).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.1.1',plain,[-(relation_field(45 ^ []) = set_union2(relation_dom(45 ^ []), relation_rng(45 ^ []))), relation(45 ^ [])],extension(6,bind([[_91807], [45 ^ []]]))).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.1.1.1',plain,[-(relation(45 ^ []))],extension(1)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.1.2',plain,[-(in(43 ^ [], relation_dom(45 ^ []))), relation(45 ^ []), in(ordered_pair(43 ^ [], 44 ^ []), 45 ^ [])],extension(7,bind([[_117128, _117196, _117263], [43 ^ [], 44 ^ [], 45 ^ []]]))).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.1.2.1',plain,[-(relation(45 ^ []))],extension(1)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.1.2.2',plain,[-(in(ordered_pair(43 ^ [], 44 ^ []), 45 ^ []))],extension(2)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.2',plain,[-(in(44 ^ [], relation_field(45 ^ []))), relation_field(45 ^ []) = set_union2(relation_dom(45 ^ []), relation_rng(45 ^ [])), in(44 ^ [], relation_rng(45 ^ []))],extension(5,bind([[_85436, _85297, _85600, _85367], [relation_field(45 ^ []), relation_dom(45 ^ []), 44 ^ [], relation_rng(45 ^ [])]]))).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.2.1',plain,[-(relation_field(45 ^ []) = set_union2(relation_dom(45 ^ []), relation_rng(45 ^ []))), relation(45 ^ [])],extension(6,bind([[_91807], [45 ^ []]]))).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.2.1.1',plain,[-(relation(45 ^ []))],extension(1)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.2.2',plain,[-(in(44 ^ [], relation_rng(45 ^ []))), relation(45 ^ []), in(ordered_pair(43 ^ [], 44 ^ []), 45 ^ [])],extension(8,bind([[_117128, _117196, _117263], [43 ^ [], 44 ^ [], 45 ^ []]]))).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.2.2.1',plain,[-(relation(45 ^ []))],extension(1)).
% 0.40/1.41 cnf('1.2.2.2',plain,[-(in(ordered_pair(43 ^ [], 44 ^ []), 45 ^ []))],extension(2)).
% 0.40/1.41 %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/1.42
% 0.40/1.42 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------