TSTP Solution File: SEU180+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SEU180+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 13:29:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 50.19s 50.49s
% Output   : Refutation 50.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU180+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 04:42:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.72/1.00  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.72/1.00  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.72/1.00  Process 15378 was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.72/1.00  Sun Jun 19 04:42:58 2022
% 0.72/1.00  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_15152_n017.cluster.edu".
% 0.72/1.00  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.72/1.00  
% 0.72/1.00  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.72/1.00  
% 0.72/1.00  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_15152_n017.cluster.edu
% 0.72/1.00  
% 0.72/1.00  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.72/1.00  set(auto2).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.72/1.00      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.72/1.00      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.72/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.72/1.00  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.72/1.00  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.72/1.00  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.72/1.00  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.72/1.00  clear(print_given).
% 0.72/1.00  
% 0.72/1.00  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (36 formulas)
% 0.72/1.00  
% 0.72/1.00  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.72/1.00  
% 0.72/1.00  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.72/1.00  
% 0.72/1.00  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.72/1.00  
% 0.72/1.00  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.72/1.00  1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  2 (all A all B unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  3 (all A all B set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  4 (all A all B all C (C = set_union2(A,B) <-> (all D (in(D,C) <-> in(D,A) | in(D,B))))) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  5 (all A (relation(A) -> (all B (B = relation_dom(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> (exists D in(ordered_pair(C,D),A)))))))) # label(d4_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  6 (all A (relation(A) -> (all B (B = relation_rng(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> (exists D in(ordered_pair(D,C),A)))))))) # label(d5_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  7 (all A all B ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A))) # label(d5_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  8 (all A (relation(A) -> relation_field(A) = set_union2(relation_dom(A),relation_rng(A)))) # label(d6_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  9 $T # label(dt_k1_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  10 $T # label(dt_k1_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  11 $T # label(dt_k1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  12 $T # label(dt_k2_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  13 $T # label(dt_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  14 $T # label(dt_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  15 $T # label(dt_k3_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  16 $T # label(dt_k4_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.72/1.00  17 $T # label(dt_m1_subset_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  18 (all A exists B element(B,A)) # label(existence_m1_subset_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  19 (all A all B -empty(ordered_pair(A,B))) # label(fc1_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  20 (all A all B (relation(A) & relation(B) -> relation(set_union2(A,B)))) # label(fc2_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  21 (all A -empty(singleton(A))) # label(fc2_subset_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  22 (all A all B (-empty(A) -> -empty(set_union2(A,B)))) # label(fc2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  23 (all A all B -empty(unordered_pair(A,B))) # label(fc3_subset_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  24 (all A all B (-empty(A) -> -empty(set_union2(B,A)))) # label(fc3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  25 (all A all B set_union2(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  26 (exists A (empty(A) & relation(A))) # label(rc1_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  27 (exists A empty(A)) # label(rc1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  28 (exists A -empty(A)) # label(rc2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  29 (all A set_union2(A,empty_set) = A) # label(t1_boole) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  30 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> element(A,B))) # label(t1_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  31 (all A all B (element(A,B) -> empty(B) | in(A,B))) # label(t2_subset) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  32 (all A (empty(A) -> A = empty_set)) # label(t6_boole) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  33 (all A all B -(in(A,B) & empty(B))) # label(t7_boole) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  34 (all A all B -(empty(A) & A != B & empty(B))) # label(t8_boole) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  35 -(all A all B all C (relation(C) -> (in(ordered_pair(A,B),C) -> in(A,relation_field(C)) & in(B,relation_field(C))))) # label(t30_relat_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 50.19/50.49  36 -element(A,B) | empty(B) | in(A,B) # label(t2_subset) # label(axiom).  [clausify(31)].
% 50.19/50.49  37 element(f8(A),A) # label(existence_m1_subset_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 50.19/50.49  38 -in(A,B) | element(A,B) # label(t1_subset) # label(axiom).  [clausify(30)].
% 50.19/50.49  Derived: empty(A) | in(f8(A),A).  [resolve(36,a,37,a)].
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Term ordering decisions:
% 50.19/50.49  Function symbol KB weights:  empty_set=1. c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. set_union2=1. ordered_pair=1. unordered_pair=1. f3=1. f4=1. f6=1. f7=1. relation_dom=1. relation_rng=1. relation_field=1. singleton=1. f8=1. f1=1. f2=1. f5=1.
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Low Water (keep): wt=19.000, iters=3360
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Low Water (keep): wt=18.000, iters=3348
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Low Water (keep): wt=17.000, iters=3375
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3380
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3375
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Low Water (keep): wt=14.000, iters=3336
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Low Water (keep): wt=13.000, iters=3334
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Low Water (displace): id=2954, wt=52.000
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 50.19/50.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 50.19/50.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  % Proof 1 at 48.33 (+ 1.15) seconds.
% 50.19/50.49  % Length of proof is 62.
% 50.19/50.49  % Level of proof is 16.
% 50.19/50.49  % Maximum clause weight is 28.000.
% 50.19/50.49  % Given clauses 4961.
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  2 (all A all B unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  3 (all A all B set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  4 (all A all B all C (C = set_union2(A,B) <-> (all D (in(D,C) <-> in(D,A) | in(D,B))))) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  5 (all A (relation(A) -> (all B (B = relation_dom(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> (exists D in(ordered_pair(C,D),A)))))))) # label(d4_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  6 (all A (relation(A) -> (all B (B = relation_rng(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> (exists D in(ordered_pair(D,C),A)))))))) # label(d5_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  7 (all A all B ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A))) # label(d5_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  8 (all A (relation(A) -> relation_field(A) = set_union2(relation_dom(A),relation_rng(A)))) # label(d6_relat_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  25 (all A all B set_union2(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  33 (all A all B -(in(A,B) & empty(B))) # label(t7_boole) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  35 -(all A all B all C (relation(C) -> (in(ordered_pair(A,B),C) -> in(A,relation_field(C)) & in(B,relation_field(C))))) # label(t30_relat_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  39 empty(empty_set) # label(fc1_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 50.19/50.49  43 relation(c6) # label(t30_relat_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(35)].
% 50.19/50.49  44 set_union2(A,A) = A # label(idempotence_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(25)].
% 50.19/50.49  46 in(ordered_pair(c4,c5),c6) # label(t30_relat_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(35)].
% 50.19/50.49  47 unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 50.19/50.49  48 set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A) # label(commutativity_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 50.19/50.49  49 ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A)) # label(d5_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 50.19/50.49  50 ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)).  [copy(49),rewrite([47(4)])].
% 50.19/50.49  51 set_union2(A,B) = C | in(f1(A,B,C),C) | in(f1(A,B,C),A) | in(f1(A,B,C),B) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 50.19/50.49  57 -in(A,B) | -empty(B) # label(t7_boole) # label(axiom).  [clausify(33)].
% 50.19/50.49  59 -in(c4,relation_field(c6)) | -in(c5,relation_field(c6)) # label(t30_relat_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(35)].
% 50.19/50.49  65 -relation(A) | relation_field(A) = set_union2(relation_dom(A),relation_rng(A)) # label(d6_relat_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
% 50.19/50.49  66 -relation(A) | set_union2(relation_dom(A),relation_rng(A)) = relation_field(A).  [copy(65),flip(b)].
% 50.19/50.49  67 set_union2(A,B) != C | in(D,C) | -in(D,A) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 50.19/50.49  68 set_union2(A,B) != C | in(D,C) | -in(D,B) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 50.19/50.49  69 set_union2(A,B) != C | -in(D,C) | in(D,A) | in(D,B) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 50.19/50.49  70 -relation(A) | relation_dom(A) != B | in(C,B) | -in(ordered_pair(C,D),A) # label(d4_relat_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 50.19/50.49  71 -relation(A) | relation_dom(A) != B | in(C,B) | -in(unordered_pair(singleton(C),unordered_pair(C,D)),A).  [copy(70),rewrite([50(5)])].
% 50.19/50.49  72 -relation(A) | relation_rng(A) != B | in(C,B) | -in(ordered_pair(D,C),A) # label(d5_relat_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 50.19/50.49  73 -relation(A) | relation_rng(A) != B | in(C,B) | -in(unordered_pair(singleton(D),unordered_pair(C,D)),A).  [copy(72),rewrite([50(5),47(6)])].
% 50.19/50.49  74 set_union2(A,B) = C | -in(f1(A,B,C),C) | -in(f1(A,B,C),A) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 50.19/50.49  89 in(unordered_pair(singleton(c4),unordered_pair(c4,c5)),c6).  [back_rewrite(46),rewrite([50(3)])].
% 50.19/50.49  90 set_union2(A,B) = A | in(f1(A,B,A),A) | in(f1(A,B,A),B).  [factor(51,b,c)].
% 50.19/50.49  95 set_union2(A,B) = A | -in(f1(A,B,A),A).  [factor(74,b,c)].
% 50.19/50.49  102 -in(A,empty_set).  [ur(57,b,39,a)].
% 50.19/50.49  119 set_union2(relation_dom(c6),relation_rng(c6)) = relation_field(c6).  [resolve(66,a,43,a)].
% 50.19/50.49  122 set_union2(A,B) != C | in(f1(D,E,A),C) | set_union2(D,E) = A | in(f1(D,E,A),D) | in(f1(D,E,A),E).  [resolve(67,c,51,b)].
% 50.19/50.49  129 set_union2(A,B) != C | in(f1(C,D,A),C) | set_union2(C,D) = A | in(f1(C,D,A),D).  [factor(122,b,d)].
% 50.19/50.49  214 relation_dom(c6) != A | in(c4,A).  [resolve(89,a,71,d),unit_del(a,43)].
% 50.19/50.49  270 set_union2(A,B) = A | in(f1(A,B,A),B).  [resolve(95,b,90,b),merge(b)].
% 50.19/50.49  322 in(c4,relation_dom(c6)).  [resolve(214,a,44,a(flip)),rewrite([44(6)])].
% 50.19/50.49  367 set_union2(A,relation_dom(c6)) != B | in(c4,B).  [resolve(322,a,68,c)].
% 50.19/50.49  574 in(c4,set_union2(A,relation_dom(c6))).  [resolve(367,a,48,a),rewrite([48(4)])].
% 50.19/50.49  578 set_union2(A,relation_dom(c6)) != set_union2(B,C) | in(c4,B) | in(c4,C).  [resolve(574,a,69,b),flip(a)].
% 50.19/50.49  1132 set_union2(A,B) = A | set_union2(B,C) != D | in(f1(A,B,A),D).  [resolve(270,b,68,c),rewrite([48(3)])].
% 50.19/50.49  1381 in(f1(set_union2(A,B),C,B),set_union2(A,B)) | set_union2(C,set_union2(A,B)) = B | in(f1(set_union2(A,B),C,B),C).  [resolve(129,a,48,a),rewrite([48(6)])].
% 50.19/50.49  12575 set_union2(A,B) = A | in(f1(A,B,A),set_union2(B,C)).  [resolve(1132,b,48,a),rewrite([48(4)])].
% 50.19/50.49  12590 set_union2(A,set_union2(A,B)) = set_union2(A,B).  [resolve(12575,b,95,b),rewrite([48(2),48(6)]),merge(b)].
% 50.19/50.49  12593 set_union2(A,B) = A | set_union2(C,set_union2(B,D)) != E | in(f1(A,B,A),E).  [resolve(12575,b,68,c)].
% 50.19/50.49  12716 set_union2(relation_dom(c6),relation_field(c6)) = relation_field(c6).  [para(119(a,1),12590(a,1,2)),rewrite([119(10)])].
% 50.19/50.49  19298 in(f1(set_union2(A,B),empty_set,B),set_union2(A,B)) | set_union2(empty_set,set_union2(A,B)) = B.  [resolve(1381,c,102,a)].
% 50.19/50.49  19797 in(f1(relation_field(c6),empty_set,relation_field(c6)),relation_field(c6)) | set_union2(empty_set,relation_field(c6)) = relation_field(c6).  [para(12716(a,1),19298(a,1,1)),rewrite([12716(11),12716(15)])].
% 50.19/50.49  19830 set_union2(empty_set,relation_field(c6)) = relation_field(c6).  [resolve(19797,a,95,b),rewrite([48(11)]),merge(b)].
% 50.19/50.49  21347 set_union2(A,B) = A | in(f1(A,B,A),set_union2(C,set_union2(B,D))).  [resolve(12593,b,48,a),rewrite([48(5)])].
% 50.19/50.49  21351 set_union2(A,set_union2(B,set_union2(A,C))) = set_union2(B,set_union2(A,C)).  [resolve(21347,b,95,b),rewrite([48(3),48(9)]),merge(b)].
% 50.19/50.49  22835 set_union2(empty_set,set_union2(A,relation_field(c6))) = set_union2(A,relation_field(c6)).  [para(19830(a,1),21351(a,1,2,2)),rewrite([19830(9)])].
% 50.19/50.49  22886 set_union2(A,relation_field(c6)) != set_union2(B,relation_dom(c6)) | in(c4,set_union2(A,relation_field(c6))).  [para(22835(a,1),578(a,2)),flip(a),unit_del(b,102)].
% 50.19/50.49  23219 in(c4,relation_field(c6)).  [resolve(22886,a,48,a),rewrite([12716(6)])].
% 50.19/50.49  23220 -in(c5,relation_field(c6)).  [back_unit_del(59),unit_del(a,23219)].
% 50.19/50.49  23222 -in(c5,relation_rng(c6)).  [ur(68,a,119,a,b,23220,a)].
% 50.19/50.49  23225 -in(unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,c5)),c6).  [ur(73,a,43,a,b,xx,c,23222,a),rewrite([47(3)])].
% 50.19/50.49  23226 $F.  [resolve(23225,a,89,a)].
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  % SZS output end Refutation
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Given=4961. Generated=2067441. Kept=23175. proofs=1.
% 50.19/50.49  Usable=4038. Sos=9526. Demods=34. Limbo=1, Disabled=9651. Hints=0.
% 50.19/50.49  Megabytes=24.16.
% 50.19/50.49  User_CPU=48.34, System_CPU=1.15, Wall_clock=50.
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  ============================== end of search =========================
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  THEOREM PROVED
% 50.19/50.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 50.19/50.49  
% 50.19/50.49  Process 15378 exit (max_proofs) Sun Jun 19 04:43:48 2022
% 50.19/50.49  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------