TSTP Solution File: SEU180+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU180+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 114 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 140 ( 54 ~; 58 |; 15 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 14 sgn 40 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t30_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_field(X3))
& in(X2,relation_field(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t30_relat_1) ).
fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_relat_1) ).
fof(d6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation_field(X1) = set_union2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d6_relat_1) ).
fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = set_union2(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X1)
| in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d2_xboole_0) ).
fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d4_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_field(X3))
& in(X2,relation_field(X3)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t30_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk8_3(X5,X6,X7),X7),X5)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X7),X5)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk9_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X11,esk9_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(esk9_2(X5,X6),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk10_2(X5,X6),esk9_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk3_0)
& in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
& ( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_field(esk3_0))
| ~ in(esk2_0,relation_field(esk3_0)) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ relation(X2)
| relation_field(X2) = set_union2(relation_dom(X2),relation_rng(X2)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d6_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
| in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X6)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| ~ in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| ~ in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( in(X3,X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(X7,esk11_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
| X6 != relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X9),X5)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk12_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk12_2(X5,X6),X11),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(esk12_2(X5,X6),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk12_2(X5,X6),esk13_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk2_0,relation_field(esk3_0))
| ~ in(esk1_0,relation_field(esk3_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( relation_field(X1) = set_union2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(X4,X1)
| X1 != set_union2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk2_0,X1)
| X1 != relation_rng(esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( in(X3,X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk1_0,set_union2(relation_dom(esk3_0),relation_rng(esk3_0)))
| ~ in(esk2_0,set_union2(relation_dom(esk3_0),relation_rng(esk3_0))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
in(esk2_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( in(X4,X1)
| X1 != set_union2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,X1)
| X1 != relation_dom(esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk1_0,set_union2(relation_dom(esk3_0),relation_rng(esk3_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,relation_dom(esk3_0)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU180+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 05:16:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 28
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 17
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 19
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 31
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 31
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 67
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 11
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 56
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 128
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 99
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 111
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 34
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 63
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 251
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 136
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 108
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3307
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3012 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------