TSTP Solution File: SEU179+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SEU179+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:43:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 9.51s 2.19s
% Output   : Proof 13.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU179+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.18/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 14:11:39 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.62  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.62  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.62  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.62  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.62  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.62  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.62  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.62                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.62  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.54/1.08  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.54/1.08  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.12  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.12  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.12  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.13  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.13  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 6.00/1.57  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.00/1.60  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.44/1.62  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 6.44/1.63  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.44/1.63  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 6.44/1.64  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.44/1.64  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.66/1.66  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.66/1.70  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.54/1.78  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 9.51/2.19  Prover 3: proved (1549ms)
% 9.51/2.19  
% 9.51/2.19  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.51/2.19  
% 9.51/2.19  Prover 2: stopped
% 9.51/2.19  Prover 0: stopped
% 9.51/2.19  Prover 6: stopped
% 9.51/2.19  Prover 5: stopped
% 9.51/2.20  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 9.51/2.20  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 9.51/2.20  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 9.51/2.20  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 9.51/2.20  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 10.82/2.24  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 10.82/2.25  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 10.82/2.26  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 10.82/2.26  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 10.82/2.26  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 11.62/2.35  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.62/2.36  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.62/2.37  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.62/2.37  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.62/2.39  Prover 1: Found proof (size 94)
% 11.62/2.39  Prover 1: proved (1752ms)
% 11.62/2.39  Prover 10: stopped
% 11.62/2.39  Prover 7: stopped
% 11.62/2.39  Prover 4: stopped
% 11.62/2.40  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.62/2.41  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.62/2.42  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.34/2.42  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.34/2.43  Prover 8: stopped
% 12.34/2.43  Prover 13: stopped
% 12.34/2.44  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.34/2.45  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.34/2.46  Prover 11: stopped
% 12.34/2.46  
% 12.34/2.46  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.34/2.46  
% 12.34/2.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.34/2.47  Assumptions after simplification:
% 12.34/2.47  ---------------------------------
% 12.34/2.47  
% 12.34/2.47    (d3_tarski)
% 12.68/2.50     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2)
% 12.68/2.50      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & in(v3,
% 12.68/2.50          v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 12.68/2.50      (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v0)
% 12.68/2.50          = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | in(v2, v1) = 0))
% 12.68/2.50  
% 12.68/2.50    (d4_relat_1)
% 12.68/2.51     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2:
% 12.68/2.51        int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & relation(v0) = v2) | ( ? [v2: $i] : (v2 = v1 |  ~
% 12.68/2.51          $i(v2) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] : (in(v3, v2) = v4 & $i(v3) & ( ~
% 12.68/2.51              (v4 = 0) |  ! [v5: $i] :  ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v5) =
% 12.68/2.51                  v6) |  ~ (in(v6, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v5))) & (v4 = 0 |  ? [v5: $i]
% 12.68/2.51              :  ? [v6: $i] : (ordered_pair(v3, v5) = v6 & in(v6, v0) = 0 & $i(v6)
% 12.68/2.51                & $i(v5))))) & ( ~ $i(v1) | ( ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0
% 12.68/2.51              |  ~ (in(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5: $i] : ( ~
% 12.68/2.51                (ordered_pair(v2, v4) = v5) |  ~ (in(v5, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v4))) & 
% 12.68/2.51            ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4:
% 12.68/2.51                $i] : (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4 & in(v4, v0) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 12.68/2.51                $i(v3)))))))
% 12.68/2.51  
% 12.68/2.51    (d5_relat_1)
% 12.68/2.51     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_rng(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2:
% 12.68/2.51        int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & relation(v0) = v2) | ( ? [v2: $i] : (v2 = v1 |  ~
% 12.68/2.51          $i(v2) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] : (in(v3, v2) = v4 & $i(v3) & ( ~
% 12.68/2.51              (v4 = 0) |  ! [v5: $i] :  ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v5, v3) =
% 12.68/2.51                  v6) |  ~ (in(v6, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v5))) & (v4 = 0 |  ? [v5: $i]
% 12.68/2.51              :  ? [v6: $i] : (ordered_pair(v5, v3) = v6 & in(v6, v0) = 0 & $i(v6)
% 12.68/2.51                & $i(v5))))) & ( ~ $i(v1) | ( ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0
% 12.68/2.51              |  ~ (in(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5: $i] : ( ~
% 12.68/2.51                (ordered_pair(v4, v2) = v5) |  ~ (in(v5, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v4))) & 
% 12.68/2.51            ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4:
% 12.68/2.51                $i] : (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v4 & in(v4, v0) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 12.68/2.51                $i(v3)))))))
% 12.68/2.51  
% 12.68/2.51    (t25_relat_1)
% 12.68/2.51     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (relation_rng(v0) = v2 &
% 12.68/2.51      relation_dom(v0) = v1 & relation(v0) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) &  ?
% 12.68/2.51      [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: any] :
% 12.68/2.51      (relation_rng(v3) = v6 & relation_dom(v3) = v4 & relation(v3) = 0 &
% 12.68/2.51        subset(v2, v6) = v7 & subset(v1, v4) = v5 & subset(v0, v3) = 0 & $i(v6) &
% 12.68/2.51        $i(v4) & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))))
% 12.68/2.51  
% 12.68/2.51    (function-axioms)
% 12.68/2.52     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 12.68/2.52    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 12.68/2.52     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 12.68/2.52      (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 12.68/2.52      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 12.68/2.52    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 12.68/2.52      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 12.68/2.52      (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 12.68/2.52      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 12.68/2.52    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 12.68/2.52    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v1) |  ~ (powerset(v2)
% 12.68/2.52        = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 12.68/2.52      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] : 
% 12.68/2.52    ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.68/2.52      (singleton(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |
% 12.68/2.52       ~ (relation_rng(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_rng(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 12.68/2.52    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_dom(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.68/2.52      (relation_dom(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 12.68/2.52      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.68/2.52      (relation(v2) = v0))
% 12.68/2.52  
% 12.68/2.52  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 12.68/2.52  --------------------------------------------
% 12.68/2.52  antisymmetry_r2_hidden, commutativity_k2_tarski, d5_tarski, dt_k1_relat_1,
% 12.68/2.52  dt_k1_tarski, dt_k1_xboole_0, dt_k1_zfmisc_1, dt_k2_relat_1, dt_k2_tarski,
% 12.68/2.52  dt_k4_tarski, dt_m1_subset_1, existence_m1_subset_1, fc1_subset_1, fc1_xboole_0,
% 12.68/2.52  fc1_zfmisc_1, fc2_subset_1, fc3_subset_1, rc1_relat_1, rc1_subset_1,
% 12.68/2.52  rc1_xboole_0, rc2_subset_1, rc2_xboole_0, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t1_subset,
% 12.68/2.52  t2_subset, t3_subset, t4_subset, t5_subset, t6_boole, t7_boole, t8_boole
% 12.68/2.52  
% 12.68/2.52  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 12.68/2.52  ---------------------------------
% 12.68/2.52  
% 12.68/2.52  Begin of proof
% 12.68/2.52  | 
% 12.68/2.52  | ALPHA: (d3_tarski) implies:
% 12.68/2.52  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 12.68/2.52  |          $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | in(v2, v1)
% 12.68/2.52  |            = 0))
% 12.68/2.52  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1)
% 12.68/2.52  |            = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~
% 12.68/2.52  |            (v4 = 0) & in(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)))
% 12.68/2.52  | 
% 12.68/2.52  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 12.68/2.52  |   (3)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 12.68/2.52  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation(v2) = v0))
% 12.68/2.52  | 
% 12.68/2.52  | DELTA: instantiating (t25_relat_1) with fresh symbols all_33_0, all_33_1,
% 12.68/2.52  |        all_33_2 gives:
% 12.68/2.53  |   (4)  relation_rng(all_33_2) = all_33_0 & relation_dom(all_33_2) = all_33_1 &
% 12.68/2.53  |        relation(all_33_2) = 0 & $i(all_33_0) & $i(all_33_1) & $i(all_33_2) & 
% 12.68/2.53  |        ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] :
% 12.68/2.53  |        (relation_rng(v0) = v3 & relation_dom(v0) = v1 & relation(v0) = 0 &
% 12.68/2.53  |          subset(all_33_0, v3) = v4 & subset(all_33_1, v1) = v2 &
% 12.68/2.53  |          subset(all_33_2, v0) = 0 & $i(v3) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | 
% 12.68/2.53  |            ~ (v2 = 0)))
% 12.68/2.53  | 
% 12.68/2.53  | ALPHA: (4) implies:
% 12.68/2.53  |   (5)  $i(all_33_2)
% 12.68/2.53  |   (6)  $i(all_33_1)
% 12.68/2.53  |   (7)  $i(all_33_0)
% 12.68/2.53  |   (8)  relation(all_33_2) = 0
% 12.68/2.53  |   (9)  relation_dom(all_33_2) = all_33_1
% 12.68/2.53  |   (10)  relation_rng(all_33_2) = all_33_0
% 12.68/2.53  |   (11)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any]
% 12.68/2.53  |         : (relation_rng(v0) = v3 & relation_dom(v0) = v1 & relation(v0) = 0 &
% 12.68/2.53  |           subset(all_33_0, v3) = v4 & subset(all_33_1, v1) = v2 &
% 12.68/2.53  |           subset(all_33_2, v0) = 0 & $i(v3) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |
% 12.68/2.53  |              ~ (v2 = 0)))
% 12.68/2.53  | 
% 12.68/2.53  | DELTA: instantiating (11) with fresh symbols all_35_0, all_35_1, all_35_2,
% 12.68/2.53  |        all_35_3, all_35_4 gives:
% 12.68/2.53  |   (12)  relation_rng(all_35_4) = all_35_1 & relation_dom(all_35_4) = all_35_3
% 12.68/2.53  |         & relation(all_35_4) = 0 & subset(all_33_0, all_35_1) = all_35_0 &
% 12.68/2.53  |         subset(all_33_1, all_35_3) = all_35_2 & subset(all_33_2, all_35_4) = 0
% 12.68/2.53  |         & $i(all_35_1) & $i(all_35_3) & $i(all_35_4) & ( ~ (all_35_0 = 0) |  ~
% 12.68/2.53  |           (all_35_2 = 0))
% 12.68/2.53  | 
% 12.68/2.53  | ALPHA: (12) implies:
% 12.68/2.53  |   (13)  $i(all_35_4)
% 12.68/2.53  |   (14)  $i(all_35_3)
% 12.68/2.53  |   (15)  $i(all_35_1)
% 12.68/2.53  |   (16)  subset(all_33_2, all_35_4) = 0
% 12.68/2.53  |   (17)  subset(all_33_1, all_35_3) = all_35_2
% 12.68/2.53  |   (18)  subset(all_33_0, all_35_1) = all_35_0
% 12.68/2.53  |   (19)  relation(all_35_4) = 0
% 12.68/2.53  |   (20)  relation_dom(all_35_4) = all_35_3
% 12.68/2.53  |   (21)  relation_rng(all_35_4) = all_35_1
% 12.68/2.53  |   (22)   ~ (all_35_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_35_2 = 0)
% 12.68/2.53  | 
% 12.68/2.53  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_33_2, all_35_4, simplifying with (5),
% 12.68/2.53  |              (13), (16) gives:
% 12.68/2.53  |   (23)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) | in(v0,
% 12.68/2.53  |             all_35_4) = 0)
% 12.68/2.53  | 
% 12.68/2.53  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_33_1, all_35_3, all_35_2, simplifying
% 12.68/2.53  |              with (6), (14), (17) gives:
% 12.68/2.53  |   (24)  all_35_2 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0,
% 12.68/2.53  |             all_35_3) = v1 & in(v0, all_33_1) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 12.68/2.53  | 
% 12.68/2.53  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_33_0, all_35_1, all_35_0, simplifying
% 12.68/2.53  |              with (7), (15), (18) gives:
% 12.68/2.53  |   (25)  all_35_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0,
% 12.68/2.53  |             all_35_1) = v1 & in(v0, all_33_0) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 12.68/2.53  | 
% 12.68/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (d4_relat_1) with all_33_2, all_33_1, simplifying
% 12.68/2.54  |              with (5), (9) gives:
% 12.68/2.54  |   (26)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = v0) | ( ? [v0: any]
% 12.68/2.54  |           : (v0 = all_33_1 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] : (in(v1,
% 12.68/2.54  |                 v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :
% 12.68/2.54  |                 ( ~ (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4, all_33_2) = 0) | 
% 12.68/2.54  |                   ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 12.68/2.54  |                 (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4 & in(v4, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 12.68/2.54  |                   $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_33_1) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int]
% 12.68/2.54  |               : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_33_1) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i]
% 12.68/2.54  |                 :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 12.68/2.54  |                       all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0,
% 12.68/2.54  |                     all_33_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 12.68/2.54  |                 (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 12.68/2.54  |                   $i(v1))))))
% 12.68/2.54  | 
% 12.68/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (d4_relat_1) with all_35_4, all_35_3, simplifying
% 12.68/2.54  |              with (13), (20) gives:
% 12.68/2.54  |   (27)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_35_4) = v0) | ( ? [v0: any]
% 12.68/2.54  |           : (v0 = all_35_3 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] : (in(v1,
% 12.68/2.54  |                 v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :
% 12.68/2.54  |                 ( ~ (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4, all_35_4) = 0) | 
% 12.68/2.54  |                   ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 12.68/2.54  |                 (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4 & in(v4, all_35_4) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 12.68/2.54  |                   $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_35_3) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int]
% 12.68/2.54  |               : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_35_3) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i]
% 12.68/2.54  |                 :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 12.68/2.54  |                       all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0,
% 12.68/2.54  |                     all_35_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 12.68/2.54  |                 (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_4) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 12.68/2.54  |                   $i(v1))))))
% 12.68/2.54  | 
% 12.68/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (d5_relat_1) with all_33_2, all_33_0, simplifying
% 12.68/2.54  |              with (5), (10) gives:
% 12.68/2.54  |   (28)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = v0) | ( ? [v0: any]
% 12.68/2.54  |           : (v0 = all_33_0 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] : (in(v1,
% 12.68/2.54  |                 v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :
% 12.68/2.54  |                 ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4, all_33_2) = 0) | 
% 12.68/2.54  |                   ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 12.68/2.54  |                 (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v4, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 12.68/2.54  |                   $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_33_0) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int]
% 12.68/2.54  |               : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_33_0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i]
% 12.68/2.54  |                 :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 12.68/2.54  |                       all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0,
% 12.68/2.54  |                     all_33_0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 12.68/2.54  |                 (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 12.68/2.54  |                   $i(v1))))))
% 12.68/2.55  | 
% 12.68/2.55  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (d5_relat_1) with all_35_4, all_35_1, simplifying
% 12.68/2.55  |              with (13), (21) gives:
% 12.68/2.55  |   (29)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_35_4) = v0) | ( ? [v0: any]
% 12.68/2.55  |           : (v0 = all_35_1 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] : (in(v1,
% 12.68/2.55  |                 v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :
% 12.68/2.55  |                 ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4, all_35_4) = 0) | 
% 12.68/2.55  |                   ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 12.68/2.55  |                 (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v4, all_35_4) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 12.68/2.55  |                   $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_35_1) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int]
% 12.68/2.55  |               : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_35_1) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i]
% 12.68/2.55  |                 :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 12.68/2.55  |                       all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0,
% 12.68/2.55  |                     all_35_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 12.68/2.55  |                 (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_4) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 12.68/2.55  |                   $i(v1))))))
% 12.68/2.55  | 
% 12.68/2.55  | BETA: splitting (29) gives:
% 12.68/2.55  | 
% 12.68/2.55  | Case 1:
% 12.68/2.55  | | 
% 12.68/2.55  | |   (30)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_35_4) = v0)
% 12.68/2.55  | | 
% 12.68/2.55  | | DELTA: instantiating (30) with fresh symbol all_50_0 gives:
% 12.68/2.55  | |   (31)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0) & relation(all_35_4) = all_50_0
% 12.68/2.55  | | 
% 12.68/2.55  | | ALPHA: (31) implies:
% 12.68/2.55  | |   (32)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0)
% 12.68/2.55  | |   (33)  relation(all_35_4) = all_50_0
% 12.68/2.55  | | 
% 12.68/2.55  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with 0, all_50_0, all_35_4, simplifying with
% 12.68/2.55  | |              (19), (33) gives:
% 12.68/2.55  | |   (34)  all_50_0 = 0
% 12.68/2.55  | | 
% 12.68/2.55  | | REDUCE: (32), (34) imply:
% 12.68/2.55  | |   (35)  $false
% 12.68/2.55  | | 
% 12.68/2.55  | | CLOSE: (35) is inconsistent.
% 12.68/2.55  | | 
% 12.68/2.55  | Case 2:
% 12.68/2.55  | | 
% 12.68/2.55  | |   (36)   ? [v0: any] : (v0 = all_35_1 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2:
% 12.68/2.55  | |             any] : (in(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i] : 
% 12.68/2.55  | |               ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4,
% 12.68/2.55  | |                     all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] : 
% 12.68/2.55  | |               ? [v4: $i] : (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v4, all_35_4) = 0
% 12.68/2.55  | |                 & $i(v4) & $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_35_1) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 12.68/2.55  | |             [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_35_1) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 12.68/2.55  | |               ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) | 
% 12.68/2.55  | |                 ~ (in(v3, all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 12.68/2.55  | |               (in(v0, all_35_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i]
% 12.68/2.55  | |               : (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_4) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 12.68/2.55  | |                 $i(v1)))))
% 12.68/2.56  | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | ALPHA: (36) implies:
% 12.68/2.56  | |   (37)   ~ $i(all_35_1) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0,
% 12.68/2.56  | |                 all_35_1) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (
% 12.68/2.56  | |               ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_35_4) = 0) |  ~
% 12.68/2.56  | |               $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_35_1) = 0) |  ~
% 12.68/2.56  | |             $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2
% 12.68/2.56  | |               & in(v2, all_35_4) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1))))
% 12.68/2.56  | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | BETA: splitting (28) gives:
% 12.68/2.56  | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | Case 1:
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | |   (38)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = v0)
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | DELTA: instantiating (38) with fresh symbol all_50_0 gives:
% 12.68/2.56  | | |   (39)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = all_50_0
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | ALPHA: (39) implies:
% 12.68/2.56  | | |   (40)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0)
% 12.68/2.56  | | |   (41)  relation(all_33_2) = all_50_0
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with 0, all_50_0, all_33_2, simplifying
% 12.68/2.56  | | |              with (8), (41) gives:
% 12.68/2.56  | | |   (42)  all_50_0 = 0
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | REDUCE: (40), (42) imply:
% 12.68/2.56  | | |   (43)  $false
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | CLOSE: (43) is inconsistent.
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | Case 2:
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | |   (44)   ? [v0: any] : (v0 = all_33_0 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2:
% 12.68/2.56  | | |             any] : (in(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i]
% 12.68/2.56  | | |               :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4,
% 12.68/2.56  | | |                     all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] :
% 12.68/2.56  | | |                ? [v4: $i] : (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v4, all_33_2)
% 12.68/2.56  | | |                 = 0 & $i(v4) & $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_33_0) | ( ! [v0:
% 12.68/2.56  | | |               $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_33_0) = v1) | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | |               ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2,
% 12.68/2.56  | | |                     v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) & 
% 12.68/2.56  | | |             ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_33_0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1:
% 12.68/2.56  | | |                 $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2,
% 12.68/2.56  | | |                   all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))))
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | ALPHA: (44) implies:
% 12.68/2.56  | | |   (45)   ~ $i(all_33_0) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~
% 12.68/2.56  | | |             (in(v0, all_33_0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 12.68/2.56  | | |               $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_33_2)
% 12.68/2.56  | | |                 = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_33_0) =
% 12.68/2.56  | | |               0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 12.68/2.56  | | |             (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 12.68/2.56  | | |               $i(v1))))
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | BETA: splitting (27) gives:
% 12.68/2.56  | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | Case 1:
% 12.68/2.56  | | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | |   (46)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_35_4) = v0)
% 12.68/2.56  | | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (46) with fresh symbol all_50_0 gives:
% 12.68/2.56  | | | |   (47)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0) & relation(all_35_4) = all_50_0
% 12.68/2.56  | | | | 
% 12.68/2.56  | | | | ALPHA: (47) implies:
% 12.68/2.56  | | | |   (48)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0)
% 13.04/2.56  | | | |   (49)  relation(all_35_4) = all_50_0
% 13.04/2.56  | | | | 
% 13.04/2.56  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with 0, all_50_0, all_35_4, simplifying
% 13.04/2.56  | | | |              with (19), (49) gives:
% 13.04/2.56  | | | |   (50)  all_50_0 = 0
% 13.04/2.56  | | | | 
% 13.04/2.57  | | | | REDUCE: (48), (50) imply:
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |   (51)  $false
% 13.04/2.57  | | | | 
% 13.04/2.57  | | | | CLOSE: (51) is inconsistent.
% 13.04/2.57  | | | | 
% 13.04/2.57  | | | Case 2:
% 13.04/2.57  | | | | 
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |   (52)   ? [v0: any] : (v0 = all_35_3 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ?
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |           [v2: any] : (in(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3:
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |                 $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |                 (in(v4, all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3:
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |                 $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4 & in(v4,
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |                   all_35_4) = 0 & $i(v4) & $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_35_3)
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |           | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_35_3)
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |                 = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |                 (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_35_4) = 0)
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |                 |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_35_3) = 0)
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |               |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |               (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_4) = 0 & $i(v2)
% 13.04/2.57  | | | |                 & $i(v1)))))
% 13.04/2.57  | | | | 
% 13.04/2.57  | | | | ALPHA: (52) implies:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | |   (53)   ~ $i(all_35_3) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~
% 13.06/2.57  | | | |             (in(v0, all_35_3) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | |               $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 13.06/2.57  | | | |                   all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.57  | | | |             (in(v0, all_35_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | |               $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_4) = 0 &
% 13.06/2.57  | | | |               $i(v2) & $i(v1))))
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | BETA: splitting (26) gives:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |   (54)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = v0)
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (54) with fresh symbol all_50_0 gives:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |   (55)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = all_50_0
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | ALPHA: (55) implies:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |   (56)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0)
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |   (57)  relation(all_33_2) = all_50_0
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with 0, all_50_0, all_33_2, simplifying
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |              with (8), (57) gives:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |   (58)  all_50_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | REDUCE: (56), (58) imply:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |   (59)  $false
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | CLOSE: (59) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |   (60)   ? [v0: any] : (v0 = all_33_1 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ?
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |           [v2: any] : (in(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  !
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |               [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4)
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |                 |  ~ (in(v4, all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |               ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4 &
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |                 in(v4, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v4) & $i(v3))))) & ( ~
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |           $i(all_33_1) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |               (in(v0, all_33_1) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |               [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |                     all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |               (in(v0, all_33_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ?
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |               [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_33_2)
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |                 = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))))
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | | ALPHA: (60) implies:
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |   (61)   ~ $i(all_33_1) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |             (in(v0, all_33_1) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 13.06/2.57  | | | | |             [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | |                   all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | |             (in(v0, all_33_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | |               $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_33_2) = 0
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | |               & $i(v2) & $i(v1))))
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | BETA: splitting (37) gives:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |   (62)   ~ $i(all_35_1)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (15), (62) imply:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |   (63)  $false
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | CLOSE: (63) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |   (64)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_35_1)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |             = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |             (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_35_4) = 0)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |             |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_35_1) = 0)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |           |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |           (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_4) = 0 & $i(v2)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |             & $i(v1)))
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | ALPHA: (64) implies:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |   (65)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_35_1)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |             = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |             (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_35_4) = 0)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | |             |  ~ $i(v2)))
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (53) gives:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |   (66)   ~ $i(all_35_3)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (14), (66) imply:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |   (67)  $false
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (67) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |   (68)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0,
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |               all_35_3) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |             $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |                 all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |           (in(v0, all_35_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ?
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |           [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_35_4)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |             = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (68) implies:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |   (69)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0,
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |               all_35_3) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |             $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | |                 all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2)))
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (45) gives:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |   (70)   ~ $i(all_33_0)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (7), (70) imply:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |   (71)  $false
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (71) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |   (72)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0,
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |               all_33_0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |           [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |             (in(v3, all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] :
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |         ( ~ (in(v0, all_33_0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] : 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |           ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2,
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |               all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (72) implies:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |   (73)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_33_0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |           ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | |             & in(v2, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (61) gives:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |   (74)   ~ $i(all_33_1)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (6), (74) imply:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |   (75)  $false
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (75) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |   (76)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0,
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |               all_33_1) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |           [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |             (in(v3, all_33_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |         : ( ~ (in(v0, all_33_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i]
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |           :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2,
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |               all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (76) implies:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |   (77)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_33_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |            ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) =
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | |             v2 & in(v2, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (22) gives:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | |   (78)   ~ (all_35_0 = 0)
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (25) gives:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | |   (79)  all_35_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (78), (79) imply:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | |   (80)  $false
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (80) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.58  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (81)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |             all_35_1) = v1 & in(v0, all_33_0) = 0 &
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |           $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (81) with fresh symbols all_97_0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |        all_97_1 gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (82)   ~ (all_97_0 = 0) & in(all_97_1, all_35_1) =
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |         all_97_0 & in(all_97_1, all_33_0) = 0 &
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |         $i(all_97_1)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (82) implies:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (83)   ~ (all_97_0 = 0)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (84)  $i(all_97_1)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (85)  in(all_97_1, all_33_0) = 0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (86)  in(all_97_1, all_35_1) = all_97_0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (73) with all_97_1, simplifying with
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |              (84), (85) gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (87)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |             all_97_1) = v1 & in(v1, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v1)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |           & $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (65) with all_97_1, all_97_0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (84), (86) gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (88)  all_97_0 = 0 |  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |           (ordered_pair(v0, all_97_1) = v1) |  ~ (in(v1,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |               all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (87) with fresh symbols all_108_0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |        all_108_1 gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (89)  ordered_pair(all_108_1, all_97_1) = all_108_0 &
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |         in(all_108_0, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(all_108_0) &
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |         $i(all_108_1)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (89) implies:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (90)  $i(all_108_1)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (91)  $i(all_108_0)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (92)  in(all_108_0, all_33_2) = 0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (93)  ordered_pair(all_108_1, all_97_1) = all_108_0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (88) gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (94)  all_97_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (83), (94) imply:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (95)  $false
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (95) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (96)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | |               all_97_1) = v1) |  ~ (in(v1, all_35_4) = 0)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | |           |  ~ $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (23) with all_108_0, simplifying
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | |              with (91), (92) gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (97)  in(all_108_0, all_35_4) = 0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (96) with all_108_1, all_108_0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (90), (93), (97) gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (98)  $false
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (98) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | |   (99)   ~ (all_35_2 = 0)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (24) gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (100)  all_35_2 = 0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (99), (100) imply:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (101)  $false
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (101) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (102)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_35_3) = v1 & in(v0, all_33_1) = 0 &
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |            $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (102) with fresh symbols all_97_0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |        all_97_1 gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (103)   ~ (all_97_0 = 0) & in(all_97_1, all_35_3) =
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |          all_97_0 & in(all_97_1, all_33_1) = 0 &
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |          $i(all_97_1)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (103) implies:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (104)   ~ (all_97_0 = 0)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (105)  $i(all_97_1)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (106)  in(all_97_1, all_33_1) = 0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (107)  in(all_97_1, all_35_3) = all_97_0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (77) with all_97_1, simplifying with
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |              (105), (106) gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (108)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |          (ordered_pair(all_97_1, v0) = v1 & in(v1,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |              all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (69) with all_97_1, all_97_0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (105), (107) gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (109)  all_97_0 = 0 |  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |            (ordered_pair(all_97_1, v0) = v1) |  ~ (in(v1,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |                all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (108) with fresh symbols all_109_0,
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |        all_109_1 gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (110)  ordered_pair(all_97_1, all_109_1) = all_109_0 &
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |          in(all_109_0, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(all_109_0) &
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |          $i(all_109_1)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (110) implies:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (111)  $i(all_109_1)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (112)  $i(all_109_0)
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (113)  in(all_109_0, all_33_2) = 0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | |   (114)  ordered_pair(all_97_1, all_109_1) = all_109_0
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (109) gives:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.59  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (115)  all_97_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (104), (115) imply:
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (116)  $false
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (116) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (117)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | |            (ordered_pair(all_97_1, v0) = v1) |  ~ (in(v1,
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | |                all_35_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (23) with all_109_0, simplifying
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | |              with (112), (113) gives:
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (118)  in(all_109_0, all_35_4) = 0
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (117) with all_109_1, all_109_0,
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (111), (114), (118) gives:
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (119)  $false
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (119) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | | 
% 13.06/2.60  | End of split
% 13.06/2.60  | 
% 13.06/2.60  End of proof
% 13.06/2.60  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 13.06/2.60  
% 13.06/2.60  1980ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------