TSTP Solution File: SEU177+2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SEU177+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.75s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 0.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
relation(skc6),
file('SEU177+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(17,axiom,
in(ordered_pair(skc8,skc7),skc6),
file('SEU177+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(103,axiom,
( ~ in(skc7,relation_rng(skc6))
| ~ in(skc8,relation_dom(skc6)) ),
file('SEU177+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(196,axiom,
( ~ relation(u)
| ~ equal(v,relation_dom(u))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(w,x),u)
| in(w,v) ),
file('SEU177+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(198,axiom,
( ~ relation(u)
| ~ equal(v,relation_rng(u))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(w,x),u)
| in(x,v) ),
file('SEU177+2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(292,plain,
( ~ relation(skc6)
| ~ equal(u,relation_dom(skc6))
| in(skc8,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,196]),
[iquote('0:Res:17.0,196.2')] ).
cnf(293,plain,
( ~ relation(skc6)
| ~ equal(u,relation_rng(skc6))
| in(skc7,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,198]),
[iquote('0:Res:17.0,198.2')] ).
cnf(302,plain,
( ~ equal(u,relation_dom(skc6))
| in(skc8,u) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[292,1]),
[iquote('0:MRR:292.0,1.0')] ).
cnf(303,plain,
( ~ equal(u,relation_rng(skc6))
| in(skc7,u) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[293,1]),
[iquote('0:MRR:293.0,1.0')] ).
cnf(836,plain,
( ~ equal(relation_dom(skc6),relation_dom(skc6))
| ~ in(skc7,relation_rng(skc6)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[302,103]),
[iquote('0:Res:302.1,103.1')] ).
cnf(837,plain,
~ in(skc7,relation_rng(skc6)),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[836]),
[iquote('0:Obv:836.0')] ).
cnf(838,plain,
~ equal(relation_rng(skc6),relation_rng(skc6)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[303,837]),
[iquote('0:Res:303.1,837.0')] ).
cnf(839,plain,
$false,
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[838]),
[iquote('0:Obv:838.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU177+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 14:18:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.75/0.99 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.75/0.99 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.75/0.99 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.75/0.99 SPASS derived 522 clauses, backtracked 1 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 449 clauses.
% 0.75/0.99 SPASS allocated 101986 KBytes.
% 0.75/0.99 SPASS spent 0:00:00.63 on the problem.
% 0.75/0.99 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.75/0.99 0:00:00.52 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.75/0.99 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.75/0.99 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.75/0.99 0:00:00.04 for the reduction.
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99
% 0.75/0.99 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 13 :
% 0.75/0.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.75/0.99 Formulae used in the proof : t20_relat_1 d4_relat_1 d5_relat_1
% 0.75/0.99
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------