TSTP Solution File: SEU165+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU165+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.65s 1.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   55 (  24 unt;  16 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  27   ~;  17   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   6   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (;  20   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ in > empty > unordered_pair > ordered_pair > cartesian_product2 > #nlpp > singleton > #skF_7 > #skF_10 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_9 > #skF_8 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(singleton,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(unordered_pair,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(ordered_pair,type,
    ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(cartesian_product2,type,
    cartesian_product2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C,D] :
        ( in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
      <=> ( in(A,C)
          & in(B,D) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t106_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
    <=> ( in(A,C)
        & in(B,D) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l55_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ( in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10')
    | ~ in('#skF_7','#skF_9') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ~ in('#skF_7','#skF_9'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_16]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ( in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_100,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_22]) ).

tff(c_254,plain,
    ! [A_31,C_32,B_33,D_34] :
      ( in(A_31,C_32)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(A_31,B_33),cartesian_product2(C_32,D_34)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_257,plain,
    in('#skF_7','#skF_9'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_254]) ).

tff(c_261,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_257]) ).

tff(c_263,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_22]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ( in('#skF_3','#skF_5')
    | in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_267,plain,
    in('#skF_3','#skF_5'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_263,c_24]) ).

tff(c_262,plain,
    in('#skF_4','#skF_6'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_22]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ! [A_9,B_10,C_11,D_12] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(A_9,B_10),cartesian_product2(C_11,D_12))
      | ~ in(B_10,D_12)
      | ~ in(A_9,C_11) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6'))
    | in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_467,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_263,c_20]) ).

tff(c_470,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | ~ in('#skF_3','#skF_5') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_467]) ).

tff(c_474,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_267,c_262,c_470]) ).

tff(c_476,plain,
    in('#skF_7','#skF_9'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_16]) ).

tff(c_475,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10')
    | in('#skF_4','#skF_6') ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_16]) ).

tff(c_480,plain,
    ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_475]) ).

tff(c_569,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_22]) ).

tff(c_640,plain,
    ! [B_69,D_70,A_71,C_72] :
      ( in(B_69,D_70)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(A_71,B_69),cartesian_product2(C_72,D_70)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_643,plain,
    in('#skF_8','#skF_10'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_569,c_640]) ).

tff(c_647,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_480,c_643]) ).

tff(c_649,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_22]) ).

tff(c_655,plain,
    in('#skF_3','#skF_5'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_649,c_24]) ).

tff(c_648,plain,
    in('#skF_4','#skF_6'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_22]) ).

tff(c_809,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_649,c_20]) ).

tff(c_812,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | ~ in('#skF_3','#skF_5') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_809]) ).

tff(c_816,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_655,c_648,c_812]) ).

tff(c_818,plain,
    in('#skF_8','#skF_10'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_475]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ( in('#skF_3','#skF_5')
    | ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10')
    | ~ in('#skF_7','#skF_9') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_826,plain,
    in('#skF_3','#skF_5'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_476,c_818,c_18]) ).

tff(c_817,plain,
    in('#skF_4','#skF_6'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_475]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6'))
    | ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10')
    | ~ in('#skF_7','#skF_9') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_991,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_476,c_818,c_14]) ).

tff(c_994,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | ~ in('#skF_3','#skF_5') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_991]) ).

tff(c_998,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_826,c_817,c_994]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SEU165+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:22:43 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.65/1.91  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.65/1.91  
% 3.65/1.91  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.90/1.94  
% 3.90/1.94  Inference rules
% 3.90/1.94  ----------------------
% 3.90/1.94  #Ref     : 0
% 3.90/1.94  #Sup     : 243
% 3.90/1.94  #Fact    : 0
% 3.90/1.94  #Define  : 0
% 3.90/1.94  #Split   : 4
% 3.90/1.94  #Chain   : 0
% 3.90/1.94  #Close   : 0
% 3.90/1.94  
% 3.90/1.94  Ordering : KBO
% 3.90/1.94  
% 3.90/1.94  Simplification rules
% 3.90/1.94  ----------------------
% 3.90/1.94  #Subsume      : 7
% 3.90/1.95  #Demod        : 83
% 3.90/1.95  #Tautology    : 135
% 3.90/1.95  #SimpNegUnit  : 6
% 3.90/1.95  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.90/1.95  
% 3.90/1.95  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.90/1.95  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.90/1.95  
% 3.90/1.95  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.90/1.95  ----------------------
% 3.90/1.95  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 3.90/1.95  Parsing              : 0.24
% 3.90/1.95  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.90/1.95  Main loop            : 0.50
% 3.90/1.95  Inferencing          : 0.18
% 3.90/1.95  Reduction            : 0.16
% 3.90/1.95  Demodulation         : 0.12
% 3.90/1.95  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.90/1.95  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 3.90/1.95  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.90/1.95  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.90/1.95  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.90/1.95  Total                : 0.99
% 3.90/1.95  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.90/1.95  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.90/1.95  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.90/1.95  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------