TSTP Solution File: SEU165+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU165+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.99s 2.03s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   55 (  24 unt;  16 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  27   ~;  17   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   6   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (;  20   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ in > empty > unordered_pair > ordered_pair > cartesian_product2 > #nlpp > singleton > #skF_7 > #skF_10 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_9 > #skF_8 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(singleton,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(unordered_pair,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(ordered_pair,type,
    ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(cartesian_product2,type,
    cartesian_product2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_51,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C,D] :
        ( in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
      <=> ( in(A,C)
          & in(B,D) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t106_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f_57,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))
    <=> ( in(A,C)
        & in(B,D) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l55_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ( in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10')
    | ~ in('#skF_7','#skF_9') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_107,plain,
    ~ in('#skF_7','#skF_9'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_24]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ( in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_108,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_262,plain,
    ! [A_31,C_32,B_33,D_34] :
      ( in(A_31,C_32)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(A_31,B_33),cartesian_product2(C_32,D_34)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_265,plain,
    in('#skF_7','#skF_9'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_262]) ).

tff(c_269,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_265]) ).

tff(c_271,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ( in('#skF_3','#skF_5')
    | in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_275,plain,
    in('#skF_3','#skF_5'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_271,c_32]) ).

tff(c_270,plain,
    in('#skF_4','#skF_6'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [A_9,B_10,C_11,D_12] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(A_9,B_10),cartesian_product2(C_11,D_12))
      | ~ in(B_10,D_12)
      | ~ in(A_9,C_11) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6'))
    | in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_475,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_271,c_28]) ).

tff(c_478,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | ~ in('#skF_3','#skF_5') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_475]) ).

tff(c_482,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_275,c_270,c_478]) ).

tff(c_484,plain,
    in('#skF_7','#skF_9'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_24]) ).

tff(c_483,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10')
    | in('#skF_4','#skF_6') ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_24]) ).

tff(c_488,plain,
    ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_483]) ).

tff(c_577,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_648,plain,
    ! [B_69,D_70,A_71,C_72] :
      ( in(B_69,D_70)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(A_71,B_69),cartesian_product2(C_72,D_70)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_651,plain,
    in('#skF_8','#skF_10'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_577,c_648]) ).

tff(c_655,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_488,c_651]) ).

tff(c_657,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8'),cartesian_product2('#skF_9','#skF_10')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_663,plain,
    in('#skF_3','#skF_5'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_657,c_32]) ).

tff(c_656,plain,
    in('#skF_4','#skF_6'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_817,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_657,c_28]) ).

tff(c_820,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | ~ in('#skF_3','#skF_5') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_817]) ).

tff(c_824,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_663,c_656,c_820]) ).

tff(c_826,plain,
    in('#skF_8','#skF_10'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_483]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ( in('#skF_3','#skF_5')
    | ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10')
    | ~ in('#skF_7','#skF_9') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_834,plain,
    in('#skF_3','#skF_5'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_484,c_826,c_26]) ).

tff(c_825,plain,
    in('#skF_4','#skF_6'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_483]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6'))
    | ~ in('#skF_8','#skF_10')
    | ~ in('#skF_7','#skF_9') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_999,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_3','#skF_4'),cartesian_product2('#skF_5','#skF_6')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_484,c_826,c_22]) ).

tff(c_1002,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_4','#skF_6')
    | ~ in('#skF_3','#skF_5') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_999]) ).

tff(c_1006,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_834,c_825,c_1002]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU165+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:24:01 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.99/2.03  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.99/2.03  
% 3.99/2.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.99/2.06  
% 3.99/2.06  Inference rules
% 3.99/2.06  ----------------------
% 3.99/2.06  #Ref     : 0
% 3.99/2.06  #Sup     : 243
% 3.99/2.06  #Fact    : 0
% 3.99/2.06  #Define  : 0
% 3.99/2.06  #Split   : 4
% 3.99/2.06  #Chain   : 0
% 3.99/2.06  #Close   : 0
% 3.99/2.06  
% 3.99/2.06  Ordering : KBO
% 3.99/2.06  
% 3.99/2.06  Simplification rules
% 3.99/2.06  ----------------------
% 3.99/2.06  #Subsume      : 7
% 3.99/2.06  #Demod        : 83
% 3.99/2.06  #Tautology    : 139
% 3.99/2.06  #SimpNegUnit  : 6
% 3.99/2.06  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.99/2.06  
% 3.99/2.06  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.99/2.06  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.99/2.06  
% 3.99/2.06  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.99/2.06  ----------------------
% 3.99/2.07  Preprocessing        : 0.46
% 3.99/2.07  Parsing              : 0.25
% 3.99/2.07  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.99/2.07  Main loop            : 0.54
% 3.99/2.07  Inferencing          : 0.19
% 3.99/2.07  Reduction            : 0.18
% 3.99/2.07  Demodulation         : 0.13
% 3.99/2.07  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.99/2.07  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 3.99/2.07  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.99/2.07  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.99/2.07  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.99/2.07  Total                : 1.05
% 3.99/2.07  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.99/2.07  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.99/2.07  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.99/2.07  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------