TSTP Solution File: SEU164+3 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SEU164+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:25:03 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.10s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   98 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  105 (  37   ~;  51   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   1 sgn;  33   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = union(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ? [X4] :
              ( in(X3,X4)
              & in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.61RGcDUcAA/E---3.1_32345.p',d4_tarski) ).

fof(d1_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = powerset(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> subset(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.61RGcDUcAA/E---3.1_32345.p',d1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.61RGcDUcAA/E---3.1_32345.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.61RGcDUcAA/E---3.1_32345.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t99_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : union(powerset(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.61RGcDUcAA/E---3.1_32345.p',t99_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X10,X11,X12,X13,X15] :
      ( ( in(X8,esk2_3(X6,X7,X8))
        | ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != union(X6) )
      & ( in(esk2_3(X6,X7,X8),X6)
        | ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != union(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X10,X11)
        | ~ in(X11,X6)
        | in(X10,X7)
        | X7 != union(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk3_2(X12,X13),X13)
        | ~ in(esk3_2(X12,X13),X15)
        | ~ in(X15,X12)
        | X13 = union(X12) )
      & ( in(esk3_2(X12,X13),esk4_2(X12,X13))
        | in(esk3_2(X12,X13),X13)
        | X13 = union(X12) )
      & ( in(esk4_2(X12,X13),X12)
        | in(esk3_2(X12,X13),X13)
        | X13 = union(X12) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_tarski])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22] :
      ( ( ~ in(X19,X18)
        | subset(X19,X17)
        | X18 != powerset(X17) )
      & ( ~ subset(X20,X17)
        | in(X20,X18)
        | X18 != powerset(X17) )
      & ( ~ in(esk5_2(X21,X22),X22)
        | ~ subset(esk5_2(X21,X22),X21)
        | X22 = powerset(X21) )
      & ( in(esk5_2(X21,X22),X22)
        | subset(esk5_2(X21,X22),X21)
        | X22 = powerset(X21) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_zfmisc_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X2 = union(X1)
    | ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | X2 = union(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | X3 != powerset(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = union(X2)
    | in(esk4_2(X2,X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( in(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X44] : subset(X44,X44),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != powerset(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = union(powerset(X2))
    | in(esk4_2(powerset(X2),X1),powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X33,X34,X35,X36,X37] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X33,X34)
        | ~ in(X35,X33)
        | in(X35,X34) )
      & ( in(esk7_2(X36,X37),X36)
        | subset(X36,X37) )
      & ( ~ in(esk7_2(X36,X37),X37)
        | subset(X36,X37) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( union(powerset(X1)) = X1
    | in(esk4_2(powerset(X1),X1),powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( union(powerset(X1)) = X1
    | subset(esk4_2(powerset(X1),X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( union(powerset(X1)) = X1
    | in(X2,X1)
    | ~ in(X2,esk4_2(powerset(X1),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2))
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | X2 = union(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : union(powerset(X1)) = X1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t99_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( union(powerset(X1)) = X1
    | in(esk3_2(powerset(X1),X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    union(powerset(esk1_0)) != esk1_0,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( union(powerset(X1)) = X1
    | ~ in(X1,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    union(powerset(esk1_0)) != esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    union(powerset(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_11]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SEU164+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 08:22:58 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.61RGcDUcAA/E---3.1_32345.p
% 1.10/0.62  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1.10/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # sh5l with pid 32426 completed with status 0
% 1.10/0.62  # Result found by sh5l
% 1.10/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.10/0.62  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.10/0.62  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 152s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with pid 32432 completed with status 0
% 1.10/0.62  # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U
% 1.10/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.10/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.10/0.62  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.10/0.62  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.10/0.62  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U with 152s (1) cores
% 1.10/0.62  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1.10/0.62  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.10/0.62  
% 1.10/0.62  # Proof found!
% 1.10/0.62  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.10/0.62  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.10/0.62  # Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 1.10/0.62  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 1.10/0.62  # Initial clauses                      : 24
% 1.10/0.62  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.10/0.62  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 24
% 1.10/0.62  # Processed clauses                    : 1132
% 1.10/0.62  # ...of these trivial                  : 11
% 1.10/0.62  # ...subsumed                          : 427
% 1.10/0.62  # ...remaining for further processing  : 694
% 1.10/0.62  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 16
% 1.10/0.62  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.10/0.62  # Backward-subsumed                    : 10
% 1.10/0.62  # Backward-rewritten                   : 226
% 1.10/0.62  # Generated clauses                    : 12604
% 1.10/0.62  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12405
% 1.10/0.62  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.10/0.62  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 1.10/0.62  # Paramodulations                      : 12499
% 1.10/0.62  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 1.10/0.62  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.10/0.62  # Equation resolutions                 : 99
% 1.10/0.62  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1902
% 1.10/0.62  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.10/0.62  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.10/0.62  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.10/0.62  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.10/0.62  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.10/0.62  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.10/0.62  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.10/0.62  # Current number of processed clauses  : 433
% 1.10/0.62  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 1.10/0.62  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.10/0.62  #    Negative unit clauses             : 126
% 1.10/0.62  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 297
% 1.10/0.62  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11179
% 1.10/0.62  # ...number of literals in the above   : 24191
% 1.10/0.62  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.10/0.62  # Current number of archived clauses   : 260
% 1.10/0.62  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 39475
% 1.10/0.62  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30619
% 1.10/0.62  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 142
% 1.10/0.62  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8641
% 1.10/0.62  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.10/0.62  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 98
% 1.10/0.62  # BW rewrite match successes           : 59
% 1.10/0.62  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.10/0.62  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.10/0.62  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 213233
% 1.10/0.62  
% 1.10/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.10/0.62  # User time                : 0.190 s
% 1.10/0.62  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 1.10/0.62  # Total time               : 0.196 s
% 1.10/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 1.10/0.62  
% 1.10/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.10/0.62  # User time                : 0.191 s
% 1.10/0.62  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 1.10/0.62  # Total time               : 0.198 s
% 1.10/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 1.10/0.62  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.10/0.62  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------