%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU163+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.21s 2.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_95,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2))
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxg9_ykw/lgb.p',i_0_95) ).

cnf(i_0_158,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk22_0,esk23_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxg9_ykw/lgb.p',i_0_158) ).

cnf(i_0_157,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk22_0,union(esk23_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mxg9_ykw/lgb.p',i_0_157) ).

cnf(c_0_162,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2))
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_95 ).

cnf(c_0_163,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk22_0,esk23_0),
    i_0_158 ).

cnf(c_0_164,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk22_0,union(esk23_0)),
    i_0_157 ).

cnf(c_0_165,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_162,c_0_163]),c_0_164]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SEU163+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:07:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.21/2.37  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.21/2.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.21/2.37  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.21/2.37  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 7.21/2.37  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.21/2.37  #
% 7.21/2.37  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 7.21/2.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.21/2.37  
% 7.21/2.37  # Proof found!
% 7.21/2.37  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.21/2.37  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.21/2.37  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.21/2.37  
% 7.21/2.37  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.21/2.37  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 7.21/2.37  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.21/2.37  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 7.21/2.37  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.21/2.37  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------