TSTP Solution File: SEU163+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SEU163+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:25:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t92_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( in(X1,X2)
=> subset(X1,union(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0orvJFkCI8/E---3.1_14666.p',t92_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(l50_zfmisc_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( in(X1,X2)
=> subset(X1,union(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0orvJFkCI8/E---3.1_14666.p',l50_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( in(X1,X2)
=> subset(X1,union(X2)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t92_zfmisc_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,lemma,
! [X32,X33] :
( ~ in(X32,X33)
| subset(X32,union(X33)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l50_zfmisc_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& ~ subset(esk1_0,union(esk2_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,lemma,
( subset(X1,union(X2))
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk1_0,union(esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.16 % Problem : SEU163+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.38 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.39 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 09:19:09 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0orvJFkCI8/E---3.1_14666.p
% 0.23/0.56 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # new_bool_3 with pid 14745 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.56 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.56 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 14748 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Result found by G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.23/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.56 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.56 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.56 # Starting G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.56
% 0.23/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.56 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 93
% 0.23/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 51
% 0.23/0.56 # Initial clauses : 76
% 0.23/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 76
% 0.23/0.56 # Processed clauses : 29
% 0.23/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.23/0.56 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.23/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.23/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Generated clauses : 28
% 0.23/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.23/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Paramodulations : 24
% 0.23/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.23/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 19
% 0.23/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.23/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.23/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 56
% 0.23/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 145
% 0.23/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.23/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.23/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.23/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 0.23/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.23/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4021
% 0.23/0.56
% 0.23/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.56 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.56 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.56 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 1900 pages
% 0.23/0.56
% 0.23/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.56 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.23/0.56 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.56 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.23/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------