TSTP Solution File: SEU162+3 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : SEU162+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:57:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 2.62s 1.62s
% Output : Refutation 2.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 5 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 7 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 103 ( 14 ~; 0 |; 4 &; 72 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 ^; 26 !; 4 ?; 30 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(set_difference_type,type,
set_difference: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_type,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(disjoint_type,type,
disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(empty_type,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( set_difference @ A @ ( singleton @ B ) )
= A )
<=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t65_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( set_difference @ A @ ( singleton @ B ) )
= A )
<=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(10,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( ( set_difference @ A @ ( singleton @ B ) )
= A )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) )
& ( ~ ( in @ B @ A )
=> ( ( set_difference @ A @ ( singleton @ B ) )
= A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ A @ B )
=> ( disjoint @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l28_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(24,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ A @ B )
=> ( disjoint @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
=> ( disjoint @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).
thf(31,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
=> ( disjoint @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(26,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(19,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(28,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( disjoint @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B )
& ( in @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l25_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(21,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( disjoint @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B )
& ( in @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
<=> ( ( set_difference @ A @ B )
= A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t83_xboole_1) ).
thf(33,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
=> ( ( set_difference @ A @ B )
= A ) )
& ( ( ( set_difference @ A @ B )
= A )
=> ( disjoint @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(42,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,24,31,26,19,28,21,33]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SEU162+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.15 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:08:01 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.92/0.84 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.13/0.95 % [INFO] Parsing done (105ms).
% 1.13/0.96 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.56/1.16 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.62/1.16 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.62/1.16 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.62/1.21 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.78/1.23 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.78/1.24 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 1.78/1.25 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.78/1.25 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 2.62/1.58 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.62/1.58 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 2.62/1.58 % Time passed: 1074ms (effective reasoning time: 620ms)
% 2.62/1.58 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.62/1.58 % Axioms used in derivation (7): l25_zfmisc_1, rc1_xboole_0, symmetry_r1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, t83_xboole_1, l28_zfmisc_1
% 2.62/1.58 % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 2.62/1.62 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1074 ms resp. 620 ms w/o parsing
% 2.97/1.67 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.97/1.67 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------