TSTP Solution File: SEU162+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SEU162+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 20 07:27:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU162+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Sep  3 09:48:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.13/0.34  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.13/0.34    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.13/0.34    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.13/0.34    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.13/0.34    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.13/0.34    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.13/0.34    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.13/0.34    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.13/0.34    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.13/0.34    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.13/0.34    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.13/0.34    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.39  tff(disjoint_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39     disjoint: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(tptp_fun_A_1_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39     tptp_fun_A_1: $i)).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(singleton_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39     singleton: $i > $i)).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(tptp_fun_B_0_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39     tptp_fun_B_0: $i)).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(in_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39     in: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(set_difference_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39     set_difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(1,assumption,(~in(B!0, A!1)), introduced(assumption)).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(2,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (^[A: $i, B: $i] : refl((in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B)) <=> (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B)))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(3,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B)) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(4,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B)) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(5,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (^[A: $i, B: $i] : rewrite(((~in(A, B)) => disjoint(singleton(A), B)) <=> (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B)))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(6,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) => disjoint(singleton(A), B)) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[5])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(7,axiom,(![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) => disjoint(singleton(A), B))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','l28_zfmisc_1')).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(8,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 6])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(9,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 4])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(10,plain,(
% 0.13/0.39      ![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[9])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(11,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10, 3])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(12,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (((~![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))) | (in(B!0, A!1) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1))) <=> ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))) | in(B!0, A!1) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(13,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))) | (in(B!0, A!1) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(14,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : (in(A, B) | disjoint(singleton(A), B))) | in(B!0, A!1) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 12])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(15,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (in(B!0, A!1) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[14, 11])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(16,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[15, 1])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(17,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      ((~((set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1) <=> (~in(B!0, A!1)))) <=> ((set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1) <=> in(B!0, A!1))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(18,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A)))) <=> (~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A))))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(19,axiom,(~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','t65_zfmisc_1')).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(20,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A)))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[19, 18])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(21,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A)))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[20, 18])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(22,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A)))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[21, 18])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(23,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A)))),
% 0.13/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[22, 18])).
% 0.13/0.39  tff(24,plain,
% 0.13/0.39      (~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[23, 18])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(25,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[24, 18])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(26,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((set_difference(A, singleton(B)) = A) <=> (~in(B, A)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[25, 18])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(27,plain,(
% 0.19/0.39      ~((set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1) <=> (~in(B!0, A!1)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[26])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(28,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1) <=> in(B!0, A!1)),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[27, 17])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(29,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~(set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1)) | in(B!0, A!1) | (~((set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1) <=> in(B!0, A!1)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(30,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~(set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1)) | in(B!0, A!1)),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[29, 28])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(31,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (~(set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1)),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[30, 1])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(32,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (^[A: $i, B: $i] : refl((disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A)) <=> (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(33,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A)) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[32])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(34,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A)) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(35,axiom,(![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','t83_xboole_1')).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(36,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[35, 34])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(37,plain,(
% 0.19/0.39      ![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[36])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(38,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[37, 33])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(39,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) <=> (set_difference(A, B) = A))) | (disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0)) <=> (set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(40,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0)) <=> (set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1)),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[39, 38])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(41,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~(disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0)) <=> (set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1))) | (~disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))) | (set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1)),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(42,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))) | (set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1)),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[41, 40])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(43,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (~disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[42, 31])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(44,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (^[A: $i, B: $i] : refl(((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A)) <=> ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(45,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A)) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[44])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(46,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A)) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(47,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (^[A: $i, B: $i] : rewrite((disjoint(A, B) => disjoint(B, A)) <=> ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(48,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) => disjoint(B, A)) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[47])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(49,axiom,(![A: $i, B: $i] : (disjoint(A, B) => disjoint(B, A))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','symmetry_r1_xboole_0')).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(50,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[49, 48])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(51,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[50, 46])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(52,plain,(
% 0.19/0.39      ![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[51])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(53,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[52, 45])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(54,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))) | ((~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)) | disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0)))) <=> ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))) | (~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)) | disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(55,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))) | ((~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)) | disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(56,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))) | (~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)) | disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[55, 54])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(57,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)) | disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[56, 53])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(58,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ($false),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[57, 43, 16])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(59,plain,(in(B!0, A!1)), inference(lemma,lemma(discharge,[]))).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(60,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (^[A: $i, B: $i] : refl(((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B))) <=> ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B))))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(61,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B))) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[60])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(62,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (^[A: $i, B: $i] : trans(monotonicity(rewrite((disjoint(singleton(A), B) & in(A, B)) <=> (~((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B))))), ((~(disjoint(singleton(A), B) & in(A, B))) <=> (~(~((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B))))))), rewrite((~(~((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B))))) <=> ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))), ((~(disjoint(singleton(A), B) & in(A, B))) <=> ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(63,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (~(disjoint(singleton(A), B) & in(A, B))) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[62])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(64,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (~(disjoint(singleton(A), B) & in(A, B))) <=> ![A: $i, B: $i] : (~(disjoint(singleton(A), B) & in(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(65,axiom,(![A: $i, B: $i] : (~(disjoint(singleton(A), B) & in(A, B)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','l25_zfmisc_1')).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(66,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : (~(disjoint(singleton(A), B) & in(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[65, 64])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(67,plain,(
% 0.19/0.39      ![A: $i, B: $i] : (~(disjoint(singleton(A), B) & in(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[66])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(68,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[67, 63])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(69,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[68, 61])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(70,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      (((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))) | ((~in(B!0, A!1)) | (~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)))) <=> ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))) | (~in(B!0, A!1)) | (~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(71,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))) | ((~in(B!0, A!1)) | (~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)))),
% 0.19/0.39      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.39  tff(72,plain,
% 0.19/0.39      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~in(A, B)) | (~disjoint(singleton(A), B)))) | (~in(B!0, A!1)) | (~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[71, 70])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(73,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((~in(B!0, A!1)) | (~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[72, 69])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(74,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (~disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[73, 59])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(75,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1) | (~in(B!0, A!1)) | (~((set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1) <=> in(B!0, A!1)))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(76,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1) | (~in(B!0, A!1))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[75, 28])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(77,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[76, 59])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(78,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((~(disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0)) <=> (set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1))) | disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0)) | (~(set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(79,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0)) | (~(set_difference(A!1, singleton(B!0)) = A!1))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[78, 40])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(80,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[79, 77])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(81,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))) | ((~disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1))) <=> ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))) | (~disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(82,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))) | ((~disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(83,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((~![A: $i, B: $i] : ((~disjoint(A, B)) | disjoint(B, A))) | (~disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[82, 81])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(84,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((~disjoint(A!1, singleton(B!0))) | disjoint(singleton(B!0), A!1)),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[83, 53])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(85,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ($false),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[84, 80, 74])).
% 0.19/0.40  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------