TSTP Solution File: SEU162+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU162+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.59s 2.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 4 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 8 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ disjoint(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vulcby9t/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vulcby9t/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
( disjoint(X1,X2)
| set_difference(X1,X2) != X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vulcby9t/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( set_difference(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) = esk1_0
| ~ in(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vulcby9t/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| set_difference(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) != esk1_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vulcby9t/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( set_difference(X1,X2) = X1
| ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vulcby9t/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vulcby9t/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ disjoint(X2,X1) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( disjoint(X1,X2)
| set_difference(X1,X2) != X1 ),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( set_difference(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) = esk1_0
| ~ in(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( disjoint(X1,singleton(X2))
| in(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
disjoint(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| set_difference(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) != esk1_0 ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( set_difference(X1,X2) = X1
| ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
disjoint(singleton(esk2_0),esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
in(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU162+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 05:09:19 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.59/2.33 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.59/2.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.59/2.33 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.59/2.33 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0010_evo
% 7.59/2.33 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.59/2.33 #
% 7.59/2.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 7.59/2.33
% 7.59/2.33 # Proof found!
% 7.59/2.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.59/2.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.59/2.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.59/2.33
% 7.59/2.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.59/2.33 # User time : 0.011 s
% 7.59/2.33 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.59/2.33 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 7.59/2.33 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.59/2.33
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------