TSTP Solution File: SEU161+3 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SEU161+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:27:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.29s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 1.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 6 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 12 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f35,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f25,f24,f28]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ in(X0,X1)
| set_union2(singleton(X0),X1) = X1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( ~ in(X0,X1)
| set_union2(singleton(X0),X1) = X1 ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( in(X0,X1)
=> set_union2(singleton(X0),X1) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l23_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(f24,plain,
sK2 != set_union2(singleton(sK3),sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( in(X1,X0)
& set_union2(singleton(X1),X0) != X0 ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
~ ! [X1,X0] :
( in(X1,X0)
=> set_union2(singleton(X1),X0) = X0 ),
inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X0] :
( in(X0,X1)
=> set_union2(singleton(X0),X1) = X1 ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f8,conjecture,
! [X1,X0] :
( in(X0,X1)
=> set_union2(singleton(X0),X1) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t46_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(f25,plain,
in(sK3,sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU161+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 14:39:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.52 % (2019)dis+10_1:1_newcnf=on:sgt=8:sos=on:ss=axioms:to=lpo:urr=on:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (2019)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.52 % (2033)dis+1010_2:3_fs=off:fsr=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:i=82:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/82Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (2017)dis+1010_1:50_awrs=decay:awrsf=128:nwc=10.0:s2pl=no:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.29/0.52 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.29/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)------------------------------
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.29/0.52
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)Time elapsed: 0.105 s
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)------------------------------
% 1.29/0.52 % (2019)------------------------------
% 1.29/0.52 % (2010)Success in time 0.169 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------