TSTP Solution File: SEU161+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU161+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.83s 1.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   7 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   6   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   3   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (;  12   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ in > set_union2 > #nlpp > singleton > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(singleton,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(set_union2,type,
    set_union2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( in(A,B)
       => ( set_union2(singleton(A),B) = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t46_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f_45,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( in(A,B)
     => ( set_union2(singleton(A),B) = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l23_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    in('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_41]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    ! [A_14,B_15] :
      ( ( set_union2(singleton(A_14),B_15) = B_15 )
      | ~ in(A_14,B_15) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_45]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [B_2,A_1] : ( set_union2(B_2,A_1) = set_union2(A_1,B_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_97,plain,
    ! [B_16,A_17] :
      ( ( set_union2(B_16,singleton(A_17)) = B_16 )
      | ~ in(A_17,B_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_64,c_2]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    set_union2(singleton('#skF_1'),'#skF_2') != '#skF_2',
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_41]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    set_union2('#skF_2',singleton('#skF_1')) != '#skF_2',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_12]) ).

tff(c_113,plain,
    ~ in('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_97,c_17]) ).

tff(c_141,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_14,c_113]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU161+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:47:21 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.83/1.77  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.83/1.77  
% 2.83/1.77  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.01/1.80  
% 3.01/1.80  Inference rules
% 3.01/1.80  ----------------------
% 3.01/1.80  #Ref     : 0
% 3.01/1.80  #Sup     : 30
% 3.01/1.80  #Fact    : 0
% 3.01/1.80  #Define  : 0
% 3.01/1.80  #Split   : 0
% 3.01/1.80  #Chain   : 0
% 3.01/1.80  #Close   : 0
% 3.01/1.80  
% 3.01/1.80  Ordering : KBO
% 3.01/1.80  
% 3.01/1.80  Simplification rules
% 3.01/1.80  ----------------------
% 3.01/1.80  #Subsume      : 2
% 3.01/1.80  #Demod        : 2
% 3.01/1.80  #Tautology    : 17
% 3.01/1.80  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.01/1.80  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.01/1.80  
% 3.01/1.80  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.01/1.80  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.01/1.80  
% 3.01/1.80  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.01/1.80  ----------------------
% 3.01/1.81  Preprocessing        : 0.42
% 3.01/1.81  Parsing              : 0.24
% 3.01/1.81  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.01/1.81  Main loop            : 0.18
% 3.01/1.81  Inferencing          : 0.08
% 3.01/1.81  Reduction            : 0.04
% 3.01/1.81  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 3.01/1.81  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 3.01/1.81  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 3.01/1.81  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.01/1.81  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.01/1.81  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.01/1.81  Total                : 0.66
% 3.01/1.81  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.01/1.81  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.01/1.81  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.01/1.81  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------