TSTP Solution File: SEU160+3 by Goeland---1.0.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem  : SEU160+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 20 05:55:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEU160+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Sep  3 09:47:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.34  [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34  [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34  [0.000040s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  Start search
% 0.12/0.34  nb_step : 1 - limit : 5
% 0.12/0.34  Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.12/0.35  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35  [0] ALPHA_AND : (! [A2_2, B3_3] :  (subset(A2_2, A2_2)) & empty(empty_set) & ? [A4_4] :  (empty(A4_4)) & ? [A5_5] :  (~empty(A5_5)) & ~! [A6_6, B7_7] :  ((subset(A6_6, singleton(B7_7)) <=> (=(A6_6, empty_set) | =(A6_6, singleton(B7_7))))))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [1] ! [A2_2, B3_3] :  (subset(A2_2, A2_2)), empty(empty_set), ? [A4_4] :  (empty(A4_4)), ? [A5_5] :  (~empty(A5_5)), ~! [A6_6, B7_7] :  ((subset(A6_6, singleton(B7_7)) <=> (=(A6_6, empty_set) | =(A6_6, singleton(B7_7)))))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [1] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [A4_4] :  (empty(A4_4))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [2] empty(skolem_A44)
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [2] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [A5_5] :  (~empty(A5_5))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [3] ~empty(skolem_A55)
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [3] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [A6_6, B7_7] :  ((subset(A6_6, singleton(B7_7)) <=> (=(A6_6, empty_set) | =(A6_6, singleton(B7_7)))))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [4] ~(subset(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)) <=> (=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [4] BETA_NOT_EQUIV : ~(subset(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)) <=> (=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [5] ~subset(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)), (=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [6] subset(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)), ~(=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [5] Rewrite : ~subset(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [7] ~(=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [7] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [9] ~=(skolem_A66, empty_set), ~=(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [9] BETA_OR : (=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [13] =(skolem_A66, empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [14] =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [13] CLOSURE : =(skolem_A66, empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [14] CLOSURE : =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [6] Rewrite : subset(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [8] (=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [8] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [10] ~=(skolem_A66, empty_set), ~=(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [10] BETA_OR : (=(skolem_A66, empty_set) | =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77)))
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [11] =(skolem_A66, empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35  	-> [12] =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [12] CLOSURE : =(skolem_A66, singleton(skolem_B77))
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  [11] CLOSURE : =(skolem_A66, empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35  [0.010901s][1][Res] 29 goroutines created
% 0.12/0.35  ==== Result ====
% 0.12/0.35  [0.010934s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.12/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------