TSTP Solution File: SEU160+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU160+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.37s 2.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (   7 unt;   5 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (  17 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | X1 = singleton(X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rif2pjh3/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( empty_set = esk3_0
    | singleton(esk4_0) = esk3_0
    | subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rif2pjh3/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk4_0) != esk3_0
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rif2pjh3/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rif2pjh3/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    | X1 != empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rif2pjh3/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( empty_set != esk3_0
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rif2pjh3/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | X1 = singleton(X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( empty_set = esk3_0
    | singleton(esk4_0) = esk3_0
    | subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) ),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk4_0) != esk3_0
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk4_0) = esk3_0
    | empty_set = esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    | X1 != empty_set ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( empty_set != esk3_0
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) ),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set = esk3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    subset(empty_set,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    subset(esk3_0,singleton(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU160+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 07:56:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.37/2.19  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.37/2.19  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.37/2.19  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.37/2.19  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0026_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S
% 4.37/2.19  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 4.37/2.19  #
% 4.37/2.19  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 4.37/2.19  
% 4.37/2.19  # Proof found!
% 4.37/2.19  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.37/2.19  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.37/2.19  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.37/2.19  
% 4.37/2.19  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.37/2.19  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 4.37/2.19  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 4.37/2.19  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 4.37/2.19  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.37/2.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------