TSTP Solution File: SEU160+3 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SEU160+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:22:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   8 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  15   ~;  19   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   3   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   4 sgn;  11   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

fof(t39_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    <=> ( X1 = empty_set
        | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t39_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l4_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    <=> ( X1 = empty_set
        | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l4_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
      <=> ( X1 = empty_set
          | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t39_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X8,singleton(X9))
        | X8 = empty_set
        | X8 = singleton(X9) )
      & ( X8 != empty_set
        | subset(X8,singleton(X9)) )
      & ( X8 != singleton(X9)
        | subset(X8,singleton(X9)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l4_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk3_0 != empty_set
      | ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) )
    & ( esk3_0 != singleton(esk4_0)
      | ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) )
    & ( subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0))
      | esk3_0 = empty_set
      | esk3_0 = singleton(esk4_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | X1 = singleton(X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0))
    | esk3_0 = empty_set
    | esk3_0 = singleton(esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3] : subset(X3,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 != singleton(esk4_0)
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk4_0) = esk3_0
    | empty_set = esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    | X1 != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 != empty_set
    | ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set = esk3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    subset(empty_set,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    subset(esk3_0,singleton(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU160+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Aug 23 14:51:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.58  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.59  % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.19/0.59  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.59  % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------