TSTP Solution File: SEU155+1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SEU155+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 13:29:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.44s 1.00s
% Output : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU155+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 11:18:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/1.00 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/1.00 Process 22033 was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/1.00 Mon Jun 20 11:19:00 2022
% 0.44/1.00 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_21675_n017.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_21675_n017.cluster.edu
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/1.00 set(auto2).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/1.00 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/1.00 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/1.00 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.00 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/1.00 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/1.00 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/1.00 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/1.00 clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (6 formulas)
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/1.00 1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/1.00 2 (all A all B (subset(A,B) <-> (all C (in(C,A) -> in(C,B))))) # label(d3_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/1.00 3 (all A all B (B = union(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> (exists D (in(C,D) & in(D,A))))))) # label(d4_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/1.00 4 $T # label(dt_k3_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/1.00 5 (all A all B subset(A,A)) # label(reflexivity_r1_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/1.00 6 -(all A all B (in(A,B) -> subset(A,union(B)))) # label(l50_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 % Assigning unary symbol union kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (10).
% 0.44/1.00 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. f1=1. f3=1. f4=1. f2=1. union=0.
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/1.00 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/1.00 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.44/1.00 % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.44/1.00 % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.44/1.00 % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.44/1.00 % Given clauses 33.
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 2 (all A all B (subset(A,B) <-> (all C (in(C,A) -> in(C,B))))) # label(d3_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/1.00 3 (all A all B (B = union(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> (exists D (in(C,D) & in(D,A))))))) # label(d4_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/1.00 6 -(all A all B (in(A,B) -> subset(A,union(B)))) # label(l50_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/1.00 8 in(c1,c2) # label(l50_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(6)].
% 0.44/1.00 9 subset(A,B) | in(f1(A,B),A) # label(d3_tarski) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/1.00 12 -subset(c1,union(c2)) # label(l50_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(6)].
% 0.44/1.00 14 subset(A,B) | -in(f1(A,B),B) # label(d3_tarski) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/1.00 18 union(A) != B | in(C,B) | -in(C,D) | -in(D,A) # label(d4_tarski) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)].
% 0.44/1.00 22 in(f1(c1,union(c2)),c1). [resolve(12,a,9,a)].
% 0.44/1.00 27 -in(f1(c1,union(c2)),union(c2)). [ur(14,a,12,a)].
% 0.44/1.00 44 union(c2) != A | in(B,A) | -in(B,c1). [resolve(18,d,8,a)].
% 0.44/1.00 89 union(c2) != A | in(f1(c1,union(c2)),A). [resolve(44,c,22,a)].
% 0.44/1.00 92 $F. [xx_res(89,a),unit_del(a,27)].
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 Given=33. Generated=122. Kept=85. proofs=1.
% 0.44/1.00 Usable=33. Sos=52. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=13. Hints=0.
% 0.44/1.00 Megabytes=0.11.
% 0.44/1.00 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.44/1.00 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/1.00
% 0.44/1.00 Process 22033 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jun 20 11:19:00 2022
% 0.44/1.00 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------