TSTP Solution File: SEU155+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SEU155+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:24:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  23   ~;  27   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn;  23   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = union(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ? [X4] :
              ( in(X3,X4)
              & in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6SP88pgkyZ/E---3.1_16249.p',d4_tarski) ).

fof(l50_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => subset(X1,union(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6SP88pgkyZ/E---3.1_16249.p',l50_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6SP88pgkyZ/E---3.1_16249.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16,X18,X19,X20,X21,X23] :
      ( ( in(X16,esk4_3(X14,X15,X16))
        | ~ in(X16,X15)
        | X15 != union(X14) )
      & ( in(esk4_3(X14,X15,X16),X14)
        | ~ in(X16,X15)
        | X15 != union(X14) )
      & ( ~ in(X18,X19)
        | ~ in(X19,X14)
        | in(X18,X15)
        | X15 != union(X14) )
      & ( ~ in(esk5_2(X20,X21),X21)
        | ~ in(esk5_2(X20,X21),X23)
        | ~ in(X23,X20)
        | X21 = union(X20) )
      & ( in(esk5_2(X20,X21),esk6_2(X20,X21))
        | in(esk5_2(X20,X21),X21)
        | X21 = union(X20) )
      & ( in(esk6_2(X20,X21),X20)
        | in(esk5_2(X20,X21),X21)
        | X21 = union(X20) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_tarski])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( in(X1,X2)
       => subset(X1,union(X2)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l50_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X2,X3)
    | X4 != union(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & ~ subset(esk1_0,union(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( in(X1,union(X2))
    | ~ in(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X7,X8)
        | ~ in(X9,X7)
        | in(X9,X8) )
      & ( in(esk3_2(X10,X11),X10)
        | subset(X10,X11) )
      & ( ~ in(esk3_2(X10,X11),X11)
        | subset(X10,X11) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,union(esk2_0))
    | ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk1_0,X1)
    | in(esk3_2(esk1_0,X1),union(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk1_0,union(esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SEU155+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 09:46:59 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6SP88pgkyZ/E---3.1_16249.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # new_bool_3 with pid 16328 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.48  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 16331 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.21/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.48  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.48  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.48  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.48  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.48  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.48  # Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.21/0.48  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 0.21/0.48  # Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.21/0.48  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.21/0.48  # Processed clauses                    : 29
% 0.21/0.48  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # ...remaining for further processing  : 29
% 0.21/0.48  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.21/0.48  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Generated clauses                    : 15
% 0.21/0.48  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.21/0.48  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Paramodulations                      : 12
% 0.21/0.48  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.21/0.48  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.21/0.48  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.48  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.48  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.48  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.48  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.48  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.48  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48  # Current number of processed clauses  : 13
% 0.21/0.48  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.21/0.48  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.48  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.21/0.48  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
% 0.21/0.48  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.21/0.48  # ...number of literals in the above   : 17
% 0.21/0.48  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.21/0.48  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 37
% 0.21/0.48  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
% 0.21/0.48  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.48  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.21/0.48  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.48  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1009
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.48  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.48  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.48  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.48  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.21/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------