TSTP Solution File: SEU154+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU154+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.67s 2.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (  13 unt;   4 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   57 (  18 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_32,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_32) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_19,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | set_intersection2(X1,X2) != empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(i_0_17,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_intersection2(X4,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_17) ).

cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_18,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_intersection2(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3wlw69nx/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    i_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,empty_set) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | set_intersection2(X1,X2) != empty_set ),
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk2_2(X1,empty_set),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_intersection2(X4,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0),
    i_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( in(esk2_2(set_intersection2(X1,X2),empty_set),set_intersection2(X1,X2))
    | disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_intersection2(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk2_2(set_intersection2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)),empty_set),set_intersection2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_52]),c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    in(esk2_2(set_intersection2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)),empty_set),singleton(esk4_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    in(esk2_2(set_intersection2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)),empty_set),esk5_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    esk2_2(set_intersection2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)),empty_set) = esk4_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_62]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU154+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.11  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:59:03 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.67/2.48  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.67/2.48  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.67/2.48  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.67/2.48  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S006A
% 7.67/2.48  # and selection function SelectLargestNegLit.
% 7.67/2.48  #
% 7.67/2.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.67/2.48  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.67/2.48  
% 7.67/2.48  # Proof found!
% 7.67/2.48  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.67/2.48  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.67/2.48  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.67/2.48  
% 7.67/2.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.67/2.48  # User time                : 0.049 s
% 7.67/2.48  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 7.67/2.48  # Total time               : 0.053 s
% 7.67/2.48  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.67/2.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------