TSTP Solution File: SEU152+2 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEU152+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 03:50:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   9 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  106 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  19   ~;   9   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   61 (  61 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   1   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (  30   !;   4   ?;  18   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_6,type,
    sQ13_eqProxy: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).

tff(f501,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f500,f174]) ).

tff(f174,plain,
    in(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

tff(f120,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != set_union2(singleton(sK0),sK1) )
    & in(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f84,f119]) ).

tff(f119,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( ( set_union2(singleton(X0),X1) != X1 )
        & in(X0,X1) )
   => ( ( sK1 != set_union2(singleton(sK0),sK1) )
      & in(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f84,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ( set_union2(singleton(X0),X1) != X1 )
      & in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tff(f32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( in(X0,X1)
       => ( set_union2(singleton(X0),X1) = X1 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f31]) ).

tff(f31,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
     => ( set_union2(singleton(X0),X1) = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wg3imWUnM5/Vampire---4.8_18372',l23_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f500,plain,
    ~ in(sK0,sK1),
    inference(forward_literal_rewriting,[],[f499,f283]) ).

tff(f283,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X0,X0),X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f177,f209]) ).

tff(f209,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

tff(f67,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ( singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wg3imWUnM5/Vampire---4.8_18372',t69_enumset1) ).

tff(f177,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(singleton(X0),X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).

tff(f121,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(singleton(X0),X1)
        | ~ in(X0,X1) )
      & ( in(X0,X1)
        | ~ subset(singleton(X0),X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tff(f33,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(singleton(X0),X1)
    <=> in(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wg3imWUnM5/Vampire---4.8_18372',l2_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f499,plain,
    ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),sK1),
    inference(resolution,[],[f488,f340]) ).

tff(f340,plain,
    ~ sQ13_eqProxy($i,sK1,set_union2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),sK1)),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f282,f338]) ).

tff(f338,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
      ( sQ13_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2)
    <=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ13_eqProxy])]) ).

tff(f282,plain,
    sK1 != set_union2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),sK1),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f175,f209]) ).

tff(f175,plain,
    sK1 != set_union2(singleton(sK0),sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

tff(f488,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sQ13_eqProxy($i,X1,set_union2(X0,X1))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(forward_literal_rewriting,[],[f345,f395]) ).

tff(f395,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
      ( sQ13_eqProxy(X0,X2,X1)
      | ~ sQ13_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_axiom,[],[f338]) ).

tff(f345,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sQ13_eqProxy($i,set_union2(X0,X1),X1)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f185,f338]) ).

tff(f185,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_union2(X0,X1) = X1 )
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

tff(f88,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( set_union2(X0,X1) = X1 )
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

tff(f42,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
     => ( set_union2(X0,X1) = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wg3imWUnM5/Vampire---4.8_18372',t12_xboole_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SEU152+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 16:06:35 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.09/0.30  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.09/0.30  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wg3imWUnM5/Vampire---4.8_18372
% 0.56/0.77  % (18487)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.56/0.77  % (18488)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.77  % (18485)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.77  % (18489)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.77  % (18490)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.77  % (18486)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.56/0.77  % (18491)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.56/0.77  % (18492)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.78  % (18488)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.78  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.56/0.78  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.78  
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)Memory used [KB]: 1184
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78  % (18485)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.78  % (18481)Success in time 0.474 s
% 0.56/0.78  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------