TSTP Solution File: SEU151+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU151+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:47 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.79s 1.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   9 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   7   ~;   4   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   5   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (;  17   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ in > empty > unordered_pair > #nlpp > #skF_1 > #skF_7 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_8 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(unordered_pair,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(f_57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C,D] :
        ~ ( ( unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(C,D) )
          & ( A != C )
          & ( A != D ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

tff(f_42,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( C = unordered_pair(A,B) )
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( ( D = A )
            | ( D = B ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    '#skF_5' != '#skF_8',
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    '#skF_7' != '#skF_5',
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [B_4,A_3] : ( unordered_pair(B_4,A_3) = unordered_pair(A_3,B_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    unordered_pair('#skF_7','#skF_8') = unordered_pair('#skF_5','#skF_6'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_33,plain,
    unordered_pair('#skF_6','#skF_5') = unordered_pair('#skF_8','#skF_7'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_4,c_32]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [D_10,A_5] : in(D_10,unordered_pair(A_5,D_10)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_42]) ).

tff(c_88,plain,
    in('#skF_5',unordered_pair('#skF_8','#skF_7')),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_33,c_8]) ).

tff(c_128,plain,
    ! [D_23,B_24,A_25] :
      ( ( D_23 = B_24 )
      | ( D_23 = A_25 )
      | ~ in(D_23,unordered_pair(A_25,B_24)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_42]) ).

tff(c_134,plain,
    ( ( '#skF_7' = '#skF_5' )
    | ( '#skF_5' = '#skF_8' ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_128]) ).

tff(c_154,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_30,c_134]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SEU151+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:52:09 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.79/1.77  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.77  
% 2.79/1.77  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.00/1.79  
% 3.00/1.79  Inference rules
% 3.00/1.79  ----------------------
% 3.00/1.79  #Ref     : 0
% 3.00/1.79  #Sup     : 33
% 3.00/1.79  #Fact    : 0
% 3.00/1.79  #Define  : 0
% 3.00/1.79  #Split   : 0
% 3.00/1.79  #Chain   : 0
% 3.00/1.79  #Close   : 0
% 3.00/1.79  
% 3.00/1.79  Ordering : KBO
% 3.00/1.79  
% 3.00/1.79  Simplification rules
% 3.00/1.79  ----------------------
% 3.00/1.79  #Subsume      : 2
% 3.00/1.79  #Demod        : 6
% 3.00/1.79  #Tautology    : 14
% 3.00/1.79  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.00/1.79  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.00/1.79  
% 3.00/1.79  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.00/1.79  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.00/1.79  
% 3.00/1.79  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.00/1.79  ----------------------
% 3.00/1.80  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 3.00/1.80  Parsing              : 0.23
% 3.00/1.80  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.00/1.80  Main loop            : 0.20
% 3.00/1.80  Inferencing          : 0.06
% 3.00/1.80  Reduction            : 0.07
% 3.00/1.80  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 3.00/1.80  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.00/1.80  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.00/1.80  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.00/1.80  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.00/1.80  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.00/1.80  Total                : 0.71
% 3.00/1.80  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.00/1.80  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.00/1.80  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.00/1.80  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------