TSTP Solution File: SEU151+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SEU151+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 01:19:30 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.88s
% Output   : Solution 0.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21264/SEU151+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21264/SEU151+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21264/SEU151+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 21361
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.011 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(X3=unordered_pair(X1,X2)<=>![X4]:(in(X4,X3)<=>(X4=X1|X4=X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d2_tarski)).
% fof(5, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:![X4]:~(((unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X3,X4)&~(X1=X3))&~(X1=X4))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t10_zfmisc_1)).
% fof(6, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:![X4]:~(((unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X3,X4)&~(X1=X3))&~(X1=X4)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[5])).
% fof(10, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(X3=unordered_pair(X1,X2))|![X4]:((~(in(X4,X3))|(X4=X1|X4=X2))&((~(X4=X1)&~(X4=X2))|in(X4,X3))))&(?[X4]:((~(in(X4,X3))|(~(X4=X1)&~(X4=X2)))&(in(X4,X3)|(X4=X1|X4=X2)))|X3=unordered_pair(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(11, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:((~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))|![X8]:((~(in(X8,X7))|(X8=X5|X8=X6))&((~(X8=X5)&~(X8=X6))|in(X8,X7))))&(?[X9]:((~(in(X9,X7))|(~(X9=X5)&~(X9=X6)))&(in(X9,X7)|(X9=X5|X9=X6)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(12, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:((~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))|![X8]:((~(in(X8,X7))|(X8=X5|X8=X6))&((~(X8=X5)&~(X8=X6))|in(X8,X7))))&(((~(in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7))|(~(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5)&~(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)))&(in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)|(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5|esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[11])).
% fof(13, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:((((~(in(X8,X7))|(X8=X5|X8=X6))&((~(X8=X5)&~(X8=X6))|in(X8,X7)))|~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))&(((~(in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7))|(~(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5)&~(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)))&(in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)|(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5|esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[12])).
% fof(14, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:((((~(in(X8,X7))|(X8=X5|X8=X6))|~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))&(((~(X8=X5)|in(X8,X7))|~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))&((~(X8=X6)|in(X8,X7))|~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))))&((((~(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5)|~(in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))&((~(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)|~(in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))&((in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)|(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5|esk1_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[13])).
% cnf(18,plain,(in(X4,X1)|X1!=unordered_pair(X2,X3)|X4!=X3),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[14])).
% cnf(19,plain,(in(X4,X1)|X1!=unordered_pair(X2,X3)|X4!=X2),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[14])).
% cnf(20,plain,(X4=X3|X4=X2|X1!=unordered_pair(X2,X3)|~in(X4,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[14])).
% fof(25, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:?[X4]:((unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X3,X4)&~(X1=X3))&~(X1=X4)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6])).
% fof(26, negated_conjecture,?[X5]:?[X6]:?[X7]:?[X8]:((unordered_pair(X5,X6)=unordered_pair(X7,X8)&~(X5=X7))&~(X5=X8)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[25])).
% fof(27, negated_conjecture,((unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0)=unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)&~(esk2_0=esk4_0))&~(esk2_0=esk5_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[26])).
% cnf(28,negated_conjecture,(esk2_0!=esk5_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27])).
% cnf(29,negated_conjecture,(esk2_0!=esk4_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27])).
% cnf(30,negated_conjecture,(unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0)=unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27])).
% cnf(32,plain,(in(X1,X2)|unordered_pair(X3,X1)!=X2),inference(er,[status(thm)],[18,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(33,plain,(in(X1,X2)|unordered_pair(X1,X3)!=X2),inference(er,[status(thm)],[19,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(34,plain,(X1=X2|X3=X2|~in(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X3))),inference(er,[status(thm)],[20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(39,negated_conjecture,(in(esk5_0,X1)|unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0)!=X1),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[32,30,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(42,plain,(in(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2))),inference(er,[status(thm)],[33,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(46,negated_conjecture,(in(esk5_0,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0))),inference(er,[status(thm)],[39,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(53,negated_conjecture,(esk3_0=esk5_0|esk2_0=esk5_0),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[34,46,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(54,negated_conjecture,(esk3_0=esk5_0),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[53,28,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(58,negated_conjecture,(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)=unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk5_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[30,54,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(60,negated_conjecture,(esk5_0=X1|esk4_0=X1|~in(X1,unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk5_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[34,58,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(84,negated_conjecture,(esk4_0=esk2_0|esk5_0=esk2_0),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[60,42,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85,negated_conjecture,(esk5_0=esk2_0),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[84,29,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(86,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[85,28,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(87,negated_conjecture,($false),86,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 45
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 16
% # ...remaining for further processing: 29
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 5
% # Generated clauses                  : 45
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 45
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 37
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 8
% # Current number of processed clauses: 22
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 4
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 6
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 11
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% # ...number of literals in the above : 18
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 9
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 6
% # Backwards rewriting index:    18 leaves,   1.44+/-0.896 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:            5 leaves,   1.40+/-0.490 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           16 leaves,   1.38+/-0.857 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.011 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.014 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.10 CPU 0.17 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.10 CPU 0.17 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21264/SEU151+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------