TSTP Solution File: SEU151+1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SEU151+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 13:29:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.71s 1.01s
% Output : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : SEU151+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 23:39:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.71/1.01 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.71/1.01 Process 14360 was started by sandbox2 on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.71/1.01 Sat Jun 18 23:39:59 2022
% 0.71/1.01 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_14118_n025.cluster.edu".
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_14118_n025.cluster.edu
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.71/1.01 set(auto2).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.71/1.01 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.71/1.01 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.71/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.71/1.01 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.71/1.01 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.71/1.01 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.71/1.01 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.71/1.01 clear(print_given).
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (5 formulas)
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.71/1.01 1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 2 (all A all B unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 3 (all A all B all C (C = unordered_pair(A,B) <-> (all D (in(D,C) <-> D = A | D = B)))) # label(d2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 4 $T # label(dt_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 5 -(all A all B all C all D -(unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(C,D) & A != C & A != D)) # label(t10_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.71/1.01 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. unordered_pair=1. f1=1.
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.71/1.01 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.71/1.01 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.71/1.01 % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.71/1.01 % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.71/1.01 % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.71/1.01 % Given clauses 16.
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 2 (all A all B unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 3 (all A all B all C (C = unordered_pair(A,B) <-> (all D (in(D,C) <-> D = A | D = B)))) # label(d2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 5 -(all A all B all C all D -(unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(C,D) & A != C & A != D)) # label(t10_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.71/1.01 6 unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)].
% 0.71/1.01 7 unordered_pair(c3,c4) = unordered_pair(c1,c2) # label(t10_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(5)].
% 0.71/1.01 9 c3 != c1 # label(t10_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(5)].
% 0.71/1.01 10 c4 != c1 # label(t10_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(5)].
% 0.71/1.01 13 unordered_pair(A,B) != C | in(D,C) | D != B # label(d2_tarski) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)].
% 0.71/1.01 14 unordered_pair(A,B) != C | -in(D,C) | D = A | D = B # label(d2_tarski) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)].
% 0.71/1.01 37 -in(c1,unordered_pair(c1,c2)). [ur(14,a,7,a,c,9,a(flip),d,10,a(flip))].
% 0.71/1.01 59 unordered_pair(c1,c2) != unordered_pair(A,c1). [ur(13,b,37,a,c,xx),flip(a)].
% 0.71/1.01 60 $F. [resolve(59,a,6,a)].
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Given=16. Generated=141. Kept=54. proofs=1.
% 0.71/1.01 Usable=16. Sos=31. Demods=2. Limbo=0, Disabled=17. Hints=0.
% 0.71/1.01 Megabytes=0.07.
% 0.71/1.01 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.71/1.01 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.71/1.01
% 0.71/1.01 Process 14360 exit (max_proofs) Sat Jun 18 23:39:59 2022
% 0.71/1.01 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------