TSTP Solution File: SEU151+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SEU151+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:14:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.66s 1.88s
% Output   : Refutation 1.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   6 unt;   1 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   9 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( A != unordered_pair(B,C)
    | ~ in(D,A)
    | D = B
    | D = C ),
    file('SEU151+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( A != unordered_pair(B,C)
    | in(D,A)
    | D != B ),
    file('SEU151+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    dollar_c4 != dollar_c2,
    file('SEU151+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    dollar_c4 != dollar_c1,
    file('SEU151+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SEU151+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) = unordered_pair(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('SEU151+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    in(A,unordered_pair(A,B)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[11,3,11]),
    [iquote('hyper,11,3,11')] ).

cnf(36,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[14,2,18]),7,8]),
    [iquote('hyper,14,2,18,unit_del,7,8')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.11  % Problem  : SEU151+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 06:56:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.66/1.88  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.66/1.88  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 1.66/1.88  Wed Jul 27 06:56:18 2022
% 1.66/1.88  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 24775.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.66/1.88  set(auto).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.66/1.88  clear(print_given).
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  formula_list(usable).
% 1.66/1.88  all A (A=A).
% 1.66/1.88  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 1.66/1.88  all A B (unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A)).
% 1.66/1.88  all A B C (C=unordered_pair(A,B)<-> (all D (in(D,C)<->D=A|D=B))).
% 1.66/1.88  $T.
% 1.66/1.88  -(all A B C D (-(unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(C,D)&A!=C&A!=D))).
% 1.66/1.88  end_of_list.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  list(usable).
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] A=A.
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] C!=unordered_pair(A,B)| -in(D,C)|D=A|D=B.
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] C!=unordered_pair(A,B)|in(D,C)|D!=A.
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] C!=unordered_pair(A,B)|in(D,C)|D!=B.
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] C=unordered_pair(A,B)|in($f1(A,B,C),C)|$f1(A,B,C)=A|$f1(A,B,C)=B.
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] C=unordered_pair(A,B)| -in($f1(A,B,C),C)|$f1(A,B,C)!=A.
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] C=unordered_pair(A,B)| -in($f1(A,B,C),C)|$f1(A,B,C)!=B.
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] $T.
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] unordered_pair($c4,$c3)=unordered_pair($c2,$c1).
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] $c4!=$c2.
% 1.66/1.88  0 [] $c4!=$c1.
% 1.66/1.88  end_of_list.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.66/1.88  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.66/1.88  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.66/1.88  clauses in usable.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.66/1.88     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  ------------> process usable:
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 2 [] A!=unordered_pair(B,C)| -in(D,A)|D=B|D=C.
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 3 [] A!=unordered_pair(B,C)|in(D,A)|D!=B.
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 4 [] A!=unordered_pair(B,C)|in(D,A)|D!=C.
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 5 [] A=unordered_pair(B,C)| -in($f1(B,C,A),A)|$f1(B,C,A)!=B.
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 6 [] A=unordered_pair(B,C)| -in($f1(B,C,A),A)|$f1(B,C,A)!=C.
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 7 [] $c4!=$c2.
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 8 [] $c4!=$c1.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  ------------> process sos:
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [] A=A.
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 12 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=23): 13 [] A=unordered_pair(B,C)|in($f1(B,C,A),A)|$f1(B,C,A)=B|$f1(B,C,A)=C.
% 1.66/1.88  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 14 [] unordered_pair($c4,$c3)=unordered_pair($c2,$c1).
% 1.66/1.88  ---> New Demodulator: 15 [new_demod,14] unordered_pair($c4,$c3)=unordered_pair($c2,$c1).
% 1.66/1.88    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.66/1.88    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.66/1.88  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 15.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 36 [hyper,14,2,18,unit_del,7,8] $F.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.66/1.88  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.66/1.88  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.66/1.88  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  ============ end of search ============
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.66/1.88  clauses given                  5
% 1.66/1.88  clauses generated             51
% 1.66/1.88  clauses kept                  34
% 1.66/1.88  clauses forward subsumed      30
% 1.66/1.88  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.66/1.88  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.66/1.88  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.66/1.88  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.66/1.88  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.66/1.88  
% 1.66/1.88  Process 24775 finished Wed Jul 27 06:56:19 2022
% 1.66/1.88  Otter interrupted
% 1.66/1.88  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------