TSTP Solution File: SEU150+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SEU150+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:17:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU150+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Aug 23 15:49:08 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.61  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.19/0.61  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.61  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62  % File     : SEU150+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.19/0.62  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.19/0.62  % Problem  : MPTP bushy problem t9_zfmisc_1
% 0.19/0.62  % Version  : [Urb07] axioms : Especial.
% 0.19/0.62  % English  :
% 0.19/0.62  
% 0.19/0.62  % Refs     : [Ban01] Bancerek et al. (2001), On the Characterizations of Co
% 0.19/0.62  %          : [Urb07] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.62  % Source   : [Urb07]
% 0.19/0.62  % Names    : bushy-t9_zfmisc_1 [Urb07]
% 0.19/0.62  
% 0.19/0.62  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.62  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.1.0, 0.11 v7.5.0, 0.12 v7.4.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.08 v6.1.0, 0.13 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.19 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.04 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.3.0
% 0.19/0.62  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.62  %            Number of atoms       :    7 (   5 equ)
% 0.19/0.62  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.19/0.62  %            Number of connectives :    2 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
% 0.19/0.62  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.62  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
% 0.19/0.62  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.19/0.62  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.62  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.62  %            Number of variables   :    8 (   8   !;   0   ?)
% 0.19/0.62  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.19/0.62  
% 0.19/0.62  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.19/0.62  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.19/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62  fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62      ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) ).
% 0.19/0.62  
% 0.19/0.62  fof(dt_k1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62      $true ).
% 0.19/0.62  
% 0.19/0.62  fof(dt_k2_tarski,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62      $true ).
% 0.19/0.62  
% 0.19/0.62  fof(t8_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.19/0.62        ( singleton(A) = unordered_pair(B,C)
% 0.19/0.62       => A = B ) ).
% 0.19/0.62  
% 0.19/0.62  fof(t9_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.62      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.19/0.62        ( singleton(A) = unordered_pair(B,C)
% 0.19/0.62       => B = C ) ).
% 0.19/0.62  
% 0.19/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.62  %ClaNum:10(EqnAxiom:6)
% 0.19/0.62  %VarNum:9(SingletonVarNum:5)
% 0.19/0.62  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.19/0.62  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.19/0.62  %SharedTerms:7
% 0.19/0.62  %goalClause: 7 9
% 0.19/0.62  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.19/0.62  [9]~E(a3,a1)
% 0.19/0.62  [7]E(f4(a1,a3),f5(a2))
% 0.19/0.62  [8]E(f4(x81,x82),f4(x82,x81))
% 0.19/0.62  [10]E(x101,x102)+~E(f5(x101),f4(x102,x103))
% 0.19/0.62  %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.62  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.19/0.62  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.19/0.62  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.19/0.62  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f4(x41,x43),f4(x42,x43))
% 0.19/0.62  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x53,x51),f4(x53,x52))
% 0.19/0.62  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61),f5(x62))
% 0.19/0.62  
% 0.19/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62  cnf(11,plain,
% 0.19/0.62     (E(f5(a2),f4(a1,a3))),
% 0.19/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,2])).
% 0.19/0.62  cnf(12,plain,
% 0.19/0.62     (E(a2,a1)),
% 0.19/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,2,10])).
% 0.19/0.62  cnf(16,plain,
% 0.19/0.62     (E(f5(a2),f5(a1))),
% 0.19/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,8,2,10,3,6])).
% 0.19/0.62  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.62     (E(f4(x171,a2),f4(x171,a1))),
% 0.19/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,8,2,10,3,6,5])).
% 0.19/0.62  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.19/0.62     (~E(a3,a2)),
% 0.19/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,12,10,3])).
% 0.19/0.62  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.62     (~E(a1,a3)),
% 0.19/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,12,10,3,2])).
% 0.19/0.62  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.19/0.62     (~E(f5(a1),f4(a3,x261))),
% 0.19/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,8,17,22,3,2,10])).
% 0.19/0.62  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.19/0.62     (~E(f5(a1),f4(x351,a3))),
% 0.19/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,21,26,10,3])).
% 0.19/0.62  cnf(47,plain,
% 0.19/0.62     ($false),
% 0.19/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,16,35,2,3]),
% 0.19/0.62     ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.62  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.62  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------