TSTP Solution File: SEU149+3 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SEU149+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 01:19:17 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.05s
% Output   : Solution 1.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13951/SEU149+3.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13951/SEU149+3.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13951/SEU149+3.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 14047
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.011 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(X2=singleton(X1)<=>![X3]:(in(X3,X2)<=>X3=X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d1_tarski)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(X3=unordered_pair(X1,X2)<=>![X4]:(in(X4,X3)<=>(X4=X1|X4=X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d2_tarski)).
% fof(7, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(singleton(X1)=unordered_pair(X2,X3)=>X1=X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t8_zfmisc_1)).
% fof(8, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(singleton(X1)=unordered_pair(X2,X3)=>X1=X2)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[7])).
% fof(13, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(X2=singleton(X1))|![X3]:((~(in(X3,X2))|X3=X1)&(~(X3=X1)|in(X3,X2))))&(?[X3]:((~(in(X3,X2))|~(X3=X1))&(in(X3,X2)|X3=X1))|X2=singleton(X1))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(14, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(X5=singleton(X4))|![X6]:((~(in(X6,X5))|X6=X4)&(~(X6=X4)|in(X6,X5))))&(?[X7]:((~(in(X7,X5))|~(X7=X4))&(in(X7,X5)|X7=X4))|X5=singleton(X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13])).
% fof(15, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(X5=singleton(X4))|![X6]:((~(in(X6,X5))|X6=X4)&(~(X6=X4)|in(X6,X5))))&(((~(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|~(esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))&(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)|esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))|X5=singleton(X4))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[14])).
% fof(16, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((((~(in(X6,X5))|X6=X4)&(~(X6=X4)|in(X6,X5)))|~(X5=singleton(X4)))&(((~(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|~(esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))&(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)|esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))|X5=singleton(X4))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[15])).
% fof(17, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((((~(in(X6,X5))|X6=X4)|~(X5=singleton(X4)))&((~(X6=X4)|in(X6,X5))|~(X5=singleton(X4))))&(((~(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|~(esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))|X5=singleton(X4))&((in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)|esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4)|X5=singleton(X4)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[16])).
% cnf(21,plain,(X3=X2|X1!=singleton(X2)|~in(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[17])).
% fof(22, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(X3=unordered_pair(X1,X2))|![X4]:((~(in(X4,X3))|(X4=X1|X4=X2))&((~(X4=X1)&~(X4=X2))|in(X4,X3))))&(?[X4]:((~(in(X4,X3))|(~(X4=X1)&~(X4=X2)))&(in(X4,X3)|(X4=X1|X4=X2)))|X3=unordered_pair(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(23, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:((~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))|![X8]:((~(in(X8,X7))|(X8=X5|X8=X6))&((~(X8=X5)&~(X8=X6))|in(X8,X7))))&(?[X9]:((~(in(X9,X7))|(~(X9=X5)&~(X9=X6)))&(in(X9,X7)|(X9=X5|X9=X6)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:((~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))|![X8]:((~(in(X8,X7))|(X8=X5|X8=X6))&((~(X8=X5)&~(X8=X6))|in(X8,X7))))&(((~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7))|(~(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5)&~(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)))&(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)|(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5|esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[23])).
% fof(25, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:((((~(in(X8,X7))|(X8=X5|X8=X6))&((~(X8=X5)&~(X8=X6))|in(X8,X7)))|~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))&(((~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7))|(~(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5)&~(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)))&(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)|(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5|esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(26, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:((((~(in(X8,X7))|(X8=X5|X8=X6))|~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))&(((~(X8=X5)|in(X8,X7))|~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))&((~(X8=X6)|in(X8,X7))|~(X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))))&((((~(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5)|~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6))&((~(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6)|~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))&((in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)|(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X5|esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)=X6))|X7=unordered_pair(X5,X6)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[25])).
% cnf(31,plain,(in(X4,X1)|X1!=unordered_pair(X2,X3)|X4!=X2),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% fof(42, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:(singleton(X1)=unordered_pair(X2,X3)&~(X1=X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[8])).
% fof(43, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:(singleton(X4)=unordered_pair(X5,X6)&~(X4=X5)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[42])).
% fof(44, negated_conjecture,(singleton(esk5_0)=unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0)&~(esk5_0=esk6_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[43])).
% cnf(45,negated_conjecture,(esk5_0!=esk6_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44])).
% cnf(46,negated_conjecture,(singleton(esk5_0)=unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44])).
% cnf(50,plain,(X1=X2|~in(X2,singleton(X1))),inference(er,[status(thm)],[21,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(53,plain,(in(X1,X2)|unordered_pair(X1,X3)!=X2),inference(er,[status(thm)],[31,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(57,negated_conjecture,(esk5_0=X1|~in(X1,unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[50,46,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(65,plain,(in(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2))),inference(er,[status(thm)],[53,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(89,negated_conjecture,(esk5_0=esk6_0),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[57,65,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(90,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[89,45,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(91,negated_conjecture,($false),90,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 41
% # ...of these trivial                : 2
% # ...subsumed                        : 9
% # ...remaining for further processing: 30
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 39
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 36
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 31
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 8
% # Current number of processed clauses: 27
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 6
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 6
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 14
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% # ...number of literals in the above : 35
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 6
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 2
% # Backwards rewriting index:    25 leaves,   1.36+/-0.843 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:            8 leaves,   1.25+/-0.433 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           24 leaves,   1.25+/-0.661 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.009 s
% # System time            : 0.005 s
% # Total time             : 0.014 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13951/SEU149+3.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------