TSTP Solution File: SEU148+3 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SEU148+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:14:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.70s 1.91s
% Output   : Refutation 1.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   8 unt;   1 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (  11 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( A != singleton(B)
    | ~ in(C,A)
    | C = B ),
    file('SEU148+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( A != singleton(B)
    | in(C,A)
    | C != B ),
    file('SEU148+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    singleton(A) != empty_set,
    file('SEU148+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(A,singleton(B))
    | A = empty_set
    | A = singleton(B) ),
    file('SEU148+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    dollar_c4 != dollar_c3,
    file('SEU148+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SEU148+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    subset(singleton(dollar_c4),singleton(dollar_c3)),
    file('SEU148+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    in(A,singleton(A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,3,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,3,12')] ).

cnf(58,plain,
    singleton(dollar_c4) = singleton(dollar_c3),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,6]),5]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,6,unit_del,5')] ).

cnf(60,plain,
    dollar_c4 = dollar_c3,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[58,2,19]),
    [iquote('hyper,58,2,19')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[60,10]),
    [iquote('binary,60.1,10.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU148+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 07:45:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.70/1.91  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.70/1.91  The process was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 1.70/1.91  Wed Jul 27 07:45:50 2022
% 1.70/1.91  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 1457.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.70/1.91  set(auto).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.70/1.91  clear(print_given).
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  formula_list(usable).
% 1.70/1.91  all A (A=A).
% 1.70/1.91  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 1.70/1.91  all A B (B=singleton(A)<-> (all C (in(C,B)<->C=A))).
% 1.70/1.91  empty(empty_set).
% 1.70/1.91  all A (singleton(A)!=empty_set).
% 1.70/1.91  all A B (subset(A,singleton(B))<->A=empty_set|A=singleton(B)).
% 1.70/1.91  exists A empty(A).
% 1.70/1.91  exists A (-empty(A)).
% 1.70/1.91  all A B subset(A,A).
% 1.70/1.91  -(all A B (subset(singleton(A),singleton(B))->A=B)).
% 1.70/1.91  end_of_list.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  list(usable).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] A=A.
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] B!=singleton(A)| -in(C,B)|C=A.
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] B!=singleton(A)|in(C,B)|C!=A.
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] B=singleton(A)|in($f1(A,B),B)|$f1(A,B)=A.
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] B=singleton(A)| -in($f1(A,B),B)|$f1(A,B)!=A.
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] singleton(A)!=empty_set.
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] empty($c1).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] subset(singleton($c4),singleton($c3)).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] $c4!=$c3.
% 1.70/1.91  end_of_list.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.70/1.91  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.70/1.91  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.70/1.91  clauses in usable.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ------------> process usable:
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 2 [] A!=singleton(B)| -in(C,A)|C=B.
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] A!=singleton(B)|in(C,A)|C!=B.
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 4 [] A=singleton(B)| -in($f1(B,A),A)|$f1(B,A)!=B.
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 5 [] singleton(A)!=empty_set.
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 6 [] -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 7 [] subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 8 [] subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 9 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 10 [] $c4!=$c3.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ------------> process sos:
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 12 [] A=A.
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 13 [] A=singleton(B)|in($f1(B,A),A)|$f1(B,A)=B.
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 14 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 15 [] empty($c1).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 16 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 17 [] subset(singleton($c4),singleton($c3)).
% 1.70/1.91    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 62 [binary,60.1,10.1] $F.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.70/1.91  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.70/1.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.70/1.91  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ============ end of search ============
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.70/1.91  clauses given                  9
% 1.70/1.91  clauses generated             70
% 1.70/1.91  clauses kept                  59
% 1.70/1.91  clauses forward subsumed      28
% 1.70/1.91  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.70/1.91  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.70/1.91  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.70/1.91  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.70/1.91  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  Process 1457 finished Wed Jul 27 07:45:52 2022
% 1.70/1.91  Otter interrupted
% 1.70/1.91  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------