TSTP Solution File: SEU146+2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU146+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:20 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.38s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SEU146+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 01:08:09 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.38/0.60  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.38/0.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.60  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.38/0.60  SPASS derived 2525 clauses, backtracked 24 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 672 clauses.
% 0.38/0.60  SPASS allocated 99499 KBytes.
% 0.38/0.60  SPASS spent	0:00:00.26 on the problem.
% 0.38/0.60  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.38/0.60  		0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.38/0.60  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.38/0.60  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.38/0.60  		0:00:00.12 for the reduction.
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Here is a proof with depth 11, length 63 :
% 0.38/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.38/0.60  2[0:Inp] ||  -> empty(skc36)*.
% 0.38/0.60  5[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(empty_set,u)*.
% 0.38/0.60  8[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(u,u),u)**.
% 0.38/0.60  9[0:Inp] || equal(singleton(u),empty_set)** -> .
% 0.38/0.60  11[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,empty_set),u)**.
% 0.38/0.60  15[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_difference(empty_set,u),empty_set)**.
% 0.38/0.60  18[0:Inp] empty(u) ||  -> equal(u,empty_set)*.
% 0.38/0.60  20[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,v),set_union2(v,u))*.
% 0.38/0.60  23[0:Inp] || equal(u,v)* -> subset(v,u).
% 0.38/0.60  28[0:Inp] || disjoint(u,v)*+ -> disjoint(v,u)*.
% 0.38/0.60  37[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* -> subset(singleton(u),v).
% 0.38/0.60  38[0:Inp] ||  -> disjoint(u,v) in(skf18(v,u),u)*.
% 0.38/0.60  39[0:Inp] ||  -> disjoint(u,v)* in(skf18(v,w),v)*.
% 0.38/0.60  41[0:Inp] || equal(empty_set,skc4) subset(skc4,singleton(skc5))*r -> .
% 0.38/0.60  43[0:Inp] || disjoint(u,v) -> equal(set_intersection2(u,v),empty_set)**.
% 0.38/0.60  51[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,set_difference(v,u)),set_union2(u,v))**.
% 0.38/0.60  52[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_difference(set_union2(u,v),v),set_difference(u,v))**.
% 0.38/0.60  54[0:Inp] || disjoint(u,v) -> equal(set_difference(u,v),u)**.
% 0.38/0.60  57[0:Inp] || equal(singleton(skc5),skc4) subset(skc4,singleton(skc5))*r -> .
% 0.38/0.60  61[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(skc4,singleton(skc5))*r equal(empty_set,skc4) equal(singleton(skc5),skc4).
% 0.38/0.60  62[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)* subset(v,u)* -> equal(v,u).
% 0.38/0.60  68[0:Inp] || disjoint(u,v)* subset(w,u)*+ -> disjoint(w,v)*.
% 0.38/0.60  69[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* equal(v,singleton(w))*+ -> equal(u,w)*.
% 0.38/0.60  104[0:MRR:57.1,23.1] || equal(singleton(skc5),skc4)** -> .
% 0.38/0.60  106[0:MRR:61.2,104.0] ||  -> equal(empty_set,skc4) subset(skc4,singleton(skc5))*r.
% 0.38/0.60  117[0:Res:62.2,104.0] || subset(skc4,singleton(skc5)) subset(singleton(skc5),skc4)*l -> .
% 0.38/0.60  125[1:Spt:106.0] ||  -> equal(empty_set,skc4)**.
% 0.38/0.60  133[1:Rew:125.0,41.0] || equal(skc4,skc4) subset(skc4,singleton(skc5))*r -> .
% 0.38/0.60  141[1:Rew:125.0,5.0] ||  -> subset(skc4,u)*.
% 0.38/0.60  147[1:Obv:133.0] || subset(skc4,singleton(skc5))*r -> .
% 0.38/0.60  148[1:MRR:147.0,141.0] ||  -> .
% 0.38/0.60  149[1:Spt:148.0,106.0,125.0] || equal(empty_set,skc4)** -> .
% 0.38/0.60  150[1:Spt:148.0,106.1] ||  -> subset(skc4,singleton(skc5))*r.
% 0.38/0.60  152[1:MRR:117.0,150.0] || subset(singleton(skc5),skc4)*l -> .
% 0.38/0.60  163[0:EmS:18.0,2.0] ||  -> equal(empty_set,skc36)**.
% 0.38/0.60  165[1:Rew:163.0,149.0] || equal(skc36,skc4)** -> .
% 0.38/0.60  166[0:Rew:163.0,9.0] || equal(singleton(u),skc36)** -> .
% 0.38/0.60  168[0:Rew:163.0,15.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(skc36,u),skc36)**.
% 0.38/0.60  169[0:Rew:163.0,11.0] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,skc36),u)**.
% 0.38/0.60  177[0:Rew:163.0,43.1] || disjoint(u,v) -> equal(set_intersection2(u,v),skc36)**.
% 0.38/0.60  211[0:SpR:20.0,169.0] ||  -> equal(set_union2(skc36,u),u)**.
% 0.38/0.60  249[0:Res:39.0,28.0] ||  -> in(skf18(u,v),u)* disjoint(u,w)*.
% 0.38/0.60  264[0:SpR:177.1,8.0] || disjoint(u,u)* -> equal(skc36,u).
% 0.38/0.60  308[0:SpR:20.0,52.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(set_union2(u,v),u),set_difference(v,u))**.
% 0.38/0.60  310[0:SpR:211.0,52.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,u),set_difference(skc36,u))*.
% 0.38/0.60  312[0:Rew:168.0,310.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,u),skc36)**.
% 0.38/0.60  378[0:SpR:308.0,51.0] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,set_difference(v,u)),set_union2(u,set_union2(u,v)))**.
% 0.38/0.60  394[0:Rew:51.0,378.0] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,set_union2(u,v)),set_union2(u,v))**.
% 0.38/0.60  442[0:SpR:394.0,52.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(set_union2(u,v),set_union2(u,v)),set_difference(u,set_union2(u,v)))**.
% 0.38/0.60  460[0:Rew:312.0,442.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,set_union2(u,v)),skc36)**.
% 0.38/0.60  465[0:SpR:460.0,54.1] || disjoint(u,set_union2(u,v))* -> equal(skc36,u).
% 0.38/0.60  841[0:Res:249.1,465.0] ||  -> in(skf18(u,v),u)* equal(skc36,u).
% 0.38/0.60  898[0:EqR:69.1] || in(u,singleton(v))* -> equal(u,v).
% 0.38/0.60  901[0:Res:841.0,898.0] ||  -> equal(singleton(u),skc36) equal(skf18(singleton(u),v),u)**.
% 0.38/0.60  907[0:MRR:901.0,166.0] ||  -> equal(skf18(singleton(u),v),u)**.
% 0.38/0.60  940[0:SpR:907.0,38.1] ||  -> disjoint(u,singleton(v))* in(v,u).
% 0.38/0.60  949[0:Res:940.0,28.0] ||  -> in(u,v) disjoint(singleton(u),v)*.
% 0.38/0.60  3118[1:Res:150.0,68.1] || disjoint(singleton(skc5),u)* -> disjoint(skc4,u).
% 0.38/0.60  3147[1:Res:949.1,3118.0] ||  -> in(skc5,u) disjoint(skc4,u)*.
% 0.38/0.60  3179[1:Res:3147.1,264.0] ||  -> in(skc5,skc4)* equal(skc36,skc4).
% 0.38/0.60  3180[1:MRR:3179.1,165.0] ||  -> in(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.38/0.60  3204[1:Res:3180.0,37.0] ||  -> subset(singleton(skc5),skc4)*l.
% 0.38/0.60  3207[1:MRR:3204.0,152.0] ||  -> .
% 0.38/0.60  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.38/0.60  Formulae used in the proof : rc1_xboole_0 t2_xboole_1 idempotence_k3_xboole_0 l1_zfmisc_1 t1_boole t4_boole t6_boole commutativity_k2_xboole_0 d10_xboole_0 symmetry_r1_xboole_0 l2_zfmisc_1 t3_xboole_0 l4_zfmisc_1 d7_xboole_0 t39_xboole_1 t40_xboole_1 t83_xboole_1 t63_xboole_1 d1_tarski
% 0.38/0.60  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------