TSTP Solution File: SEU143+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SEU143+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:14:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.68s 1.92s
% Output   : Refutation 1.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   5 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( A != singleton(B)
    | in(C,A)
    | C != B ),
    file('SEU143+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( A != empty_set
    | ~ in(B,A) ),
    file('SEU143+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SEU143+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    singleton(dollar_c1) = empty_set,
    file('SEU143+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    in(A,singleton(A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[8,3,8]),
    [iquote('hyper,8,3,8')] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[15,5,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,15,5,12')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU143+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 08:23:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.68/1.92  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.68/1.92  The process was started by sandbox2 on n016.cluster.edu,
% 1.68/1.92  Wed Jul 27 08:23:07 2022
% 1.68/1.92  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 4236.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.68/1.92  set(auto).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.68/1.92  clear(print_given).
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  formula_list(usable).
% 1.68/1.92  all A (A=A).
% 1.68/1.92  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 1.68/1.92  all A B (B=singleton(A)<-> (all C (in(C,B)<->C=A))).
% 1.68/1.92  all A (A=empty_set<-> (all B (-in(B,A)))).
% 1.68/1.92  $T.
% 1.68/1.92  $T.
% 1.68/1.92  empty(empty_set).
% 1.68/1.92  -(all A (singleton(A)!=empty_set)).
% 1.68/1.92  exists A empty(A).
% 1.68/1.92  exists A (-empty(A)).
% 1.68/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  list(usable).
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] A=A.
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] B!=singleton(A)| -in(C,B)|C=A.
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] B!=singleton(A)|in(C,B)|C!=A.
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] B=singleton(A)|in($f1(A,B),B)|$f1(A,B)=A.
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] B=singleton(A)| -in($f1(A,B),B)|$f1(A,B)!=A.
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] A!=empty_set| -in(B,A).
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] A=empty_set|in($f2(A),A).
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] singleton($c1)=empty_set.
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] empty($c2).
% 1.68/1.92  0 [] -empty($c3).
% 1.68/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.68/1.92  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.68/1.92  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.68/1.92  clauses in usable.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.68/1.92     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  ------------> process usable:
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 2 [] A!=singleton(B)| -in(C,A)|C=B.
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] A!=singleton(B)|in(C,A)|C!=B.
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 4 [] A=singleton(B)| -in($f1(B,A),A)|$f1(B,A)!=B.
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 5 [] A!=empty_set| -in(B,A).
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 6 [] -empty($c3).
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  ------------> process sos:
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 8 [] A=A.
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 9 [] A=singleton(B)|in($f1(B,A),A)|$f1(B,A)=B.
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 10 [] A=empty_set|in($f2(A),A).
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 11 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 12 [] singleton($c1)=empty_set.
% 1.68/1.92  ---> New Demodulator: 13 [new_demod,12] singleton($c1)=empty_set.
% 1.68/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 14 [] empty($c2).
% 1.68/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [copy,8,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.68/1.92  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 13.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 24 [hyper,15,5,12] $F.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.68/1.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.68/1.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.68/1.92  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  ============ end of search ============
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.68/1.92  clauses given                  5
% 1.68/1.92  clauses generated             15
% 1.68/1.92  clauses kept                  22
% 1.68/1.92  clauses forward subsumed       5
% 1.68/1.92  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.68/1.92  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.68/1.92  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.68/1.92  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.68/1.92  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.68/1.92  
% 1.68/1.92  Process 4236 finished Wed Jul 27 08:23:09 2022
% 1.68/1.92  Otter interrupted
% 1.68/1.92  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------