%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU140+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SEU140+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 09:53:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS derived 184 clauses, backtracked 49 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 208 clauses.
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS allocated 98592 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS spent	0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 14 :
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.50  3[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(skc7,skc5)*l.
% 0.19/0.50  4[0:Inp] ||  -> disjoint(skc5,skc6)*.
% 0.19/0.50  8[0:Inp] || disjoint(skc7,skc6)* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  37[0:Inp] ||  -> disjoint(u,v) in(skf14(v,u),u)*.
% 0.19/0.50  38[0:Inp] ||  -> disjoint(u,v)* in(skf14(v,w),v)*.
% 0.19/0.50  56[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* subset(v,w)* -> in(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.50  61[0:Inp] || disjoint(u,v)* in(w,v)* in(w,u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  88[0:Res:4.0,61.2] || in(u,skc6)* in(u,skc5) -> .
% 0.19/0.50  92[0:Res:37.1,8.0] ||  -> in(skf14(skc6,skc7),skc7)*.
% 0.19/0.50  94[0:Res:38.1,8.0] ||  -> in(skf14(skc6,u),skc6)*.
% 0.19/0.50  101[0:Res:3.0,56.0] || in(u,skc7)* -> in(u,skc5).
% 0.19/0.50  196[0:Res:92.0,101.0] ||  -> in(skf14(skc6,skc7),skc5)*.
% 0.19/0.50  297[0:Res:94.0,88.0] || in(skf14(skc6,u),skc5)* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  299[0:UnC:297.0,196.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.50  Formulae used in the proof : t63_xboole_1 t3_xboole_0 d3_tarski antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 0.19/0.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------