TSTP Solution File: SEU140+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SEU140+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:04:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.88s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   66 (  27   ~;  19   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   0 sgn;  36   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_intersection2(X0,X1) = set_intersection2(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X0,X1)
    <=> set_intersection2(X0,X1) = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X0,X1)
     => disjoint(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
     => subset(set_intersection2(X0,X2),set_intersection2(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t26_xboole_1) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( subset(X0,empty_set)
     => empty_set = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_1) ).

fof(f15,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( disjoint(X1,X2)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => disjoint(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t63_xboole_1) ).

fof(f16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( disjoint(X1,X2)
          & subset(X0,X1) )
       => disjoint(X0,X2) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X0)
      | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( subset(set_intersection2(X0,X2),set_intersection2(X1,X2))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( empty_set = X0
      | ~ subset(X0,empty_set) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ disjoint(X0,X2)
      & disjoint(X1,X2)
      & subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ disjoint(X0,X2)
      & disjoint(X1,X2)
      & subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( disjoint(X0,X1)
        | set_intersection2(X0,X1) != empty_set )
      & ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) = empty_set
        | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ~ disjoint(X0,X2)
        & disjoint(X1,X2)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
   => ( ~ disjoint(sK2,sK4)
      & disjoint(sK3,sK4)
      & subset(sK2,sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(sK2,sK4)
    & disjoint(sK3,sK4)
    & subset(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f28,f36]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_intersection2(X0,X1) = set_intersection2(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) = empty_set
      | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X0,X1)
      | set_intersection2(X0,X1) != empty_set ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X0)
      | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( subset(set_intersection2(X0,X2),set_intersection2(X1,X2))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( empty_set = X0
      | ~ subset(X0,empty_set) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    subset(sK2,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    disjoint(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ~ disjoint(sK2,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    set_intersection2(X0,X1) = set_intersection2(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != empty_set
    | disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(X0,X1)
    | set_intersection2(X0,X1) = empty_set ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(X0,X1)
    | disjoint(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | subset(set_intersection2(X0,X2),set_intersection2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,empty_set)
    | X0 = empty_set ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(sK2,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK2,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

cnf(c_506,plain,
    disjoint(sK4,sK3),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_551,plain,
    set_intersection2(sK4,sK3) = empty_set,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_506,c_51]) ).

cnf(c_581,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | subset(set_intersection2(X0,X2),set_intersection2(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_687,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(sK2,sK4) != empty_set
    | disjoint(sK2,sK4) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

cnf(c_959,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,sK3)
    | subset(set_intersection2(X0,sK4),empty_set) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_551,c_581]) ).

cnf(c_1054,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,sK3)
    | set_intersection2(X0,sK4) = empty_set ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_959,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_1105,plain,
    set_intersection2(sK2,sK4) = empty_set,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_1054]) ).

cnf(c_1112,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1105,c_687,c_61]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SEU140+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 15:07:08 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.88/1.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------  iProver source info
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.88/1.17  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.88/1.17  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.88/1.17  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Parsing...
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  clauses                                 17
% 1.88/1.17  conjectures                             3
% 1.88/1.17  EPR                                     11
% 1.88/1.17  Horn                                    17
% 1.88/1.17  unary                                   10
% 1.88/1.17  binary                                  6
% 1.88/1.17  lits                                    25
% 1.88/1.17  lits eq                                 8
% 1.88/1.17  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.88/1.17  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.88/1.17  fd_cond                                 2
% 1.88/1.17  fd_pseudo_cond                          1
% 1.88/1.17  AC symbols                              0
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ 
% 1.88/1.17  Current options:
% 1.88/1.17  ------ 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------