TSTP Solution File: SEU139+1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SEU139+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:22:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 9 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 20 ~; 8 |; 6 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 2 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 2 sgn; 19 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
proper_subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
fof(antisymmetry_r2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( proper_subset(X1,X2)
=> ~ proper_subset(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_xboole_0) ).
fof(t60_xboole_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
~ ( subset(X1,X2)
& proper_subset(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_xboole_1) ).
fof(d8_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( proper_subset(X1,X2)
<=> ( subset(X1,X2)
& X1 != X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_xboole_0) ).
fof(irreflexivity_r2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ proper_subset(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',irreflexivity_r2_xboole_0) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( proper_subset(X1,X2)
=> ~ proper_subset(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[antisymmetry_r2_xboole_0]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
~ ( subset(X1,X2)
& proper_subset(X2,X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t60_xboole_1]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ proper_subset(X3,X4)
| ~ proper_subset(X4,X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& proper_subset(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ( subset(X7,X8)
| ~ proper_subset(X7,X8) )
& ( X7 != X8
| ~ proper_subset(X7,X8) )
& ( ~ subset(X7,X8)
| X7 = X8
| proper_subset(X7,X8) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_xboole_0])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ proper_subset(X1,X2)
| ~ proper_subset(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
proper_subset(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X1,X2] : ~ proper_subset(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexivity_r2_xboole_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X1 = X2
| proper_subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ proper_subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X9] : ~ proper_subset(X9,X9),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk2_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
~ proper_subset(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU139+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 16:43:38 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.57 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.006000 s
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.009000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------