TSTP Solution File: SEU139+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU139+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.60s 1.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  10 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  11   ~;   4   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (;  13   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > proper_subset > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(proper_subset,type,
    proper_subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(f_47,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ~ proper_subset(A,A),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',irreflexivity_r2_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ~ ( subset(A,B)
          & proper_subset(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_xboole_1) ).

tff(f_44,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( proper_subset(A,B)
    <=> ( subset(A,B)
        & ( A != B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( A = B )
    <=> ( subset(A,B)
        & subset(B,A) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [A_7] : ~ proper_subset(A_7,A_7),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_47]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    proper_subset('#skF_2','#skF_1'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [A_5,B_6] :
      ( subset(A_5,B_6)
      | ~ proper_subset(A_5,B_6) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    subset('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [B_17,A_18] :
      ( ( B_17 = A_18 )
      | ~ subset(B_17,A_18)
      | ~ subset(A_18,B_17) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ( ( '#skF_2' = '#skF_1' )
    | ~ subset('#skF_2','#skF_1') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_32]) ).

tff(c_45,plain,
    ~ subset('#skF_2','#skF_1'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_44]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    ~ proper_subset('#skF_2','#skF_1'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_45]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_20,c_48]) ).

tff(c_53,plain,
    '#skF_2' = '#skF_1',
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_44]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    proper_subset('#skF_1','#skF_1'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_53,c_20]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_56]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU139+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:40:56 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.60/1.61  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.60/1.61  
% 2.60/1.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.60/1.64  
% 2.60/1.64  Inference rules
% 2.60/1.64  ----------------------
% 2.60/1.64  #Ref     : 0
% 2.60/1.64  #Sup     : 5
% 2.60/1.64  #Fact    : 0
% 2.60/1.64  #Define  : 0
% 2.60/1.64  #Split   : 1
% 2.60/1.64  #Chain   : 0
% 2.60/1.64  #Close   : 0
% 2.60/1.64  
% 2.60/1.64  Ordering : KBO
% 2.60/1.64  
% 2.60/1.64  Simplification rules
% 2.60/1.64  ----------------------
% 2.60/1.64  #Subsume      : 2
% 2.60/1.64  #Demod        : 7
% 2.60/1.64  #Tautology    : 3
% 2.60/1.64  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 2.60/1.64  #BackRed      : 3
% 2.60/1.64  
% 2.60/1.64  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.60/1.64  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.60/1.64  
% 2.60/1.64  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.60/1.64  ----------------------
% 2.82/1.64  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 2.82/1.64  Parsing              : 0.23
% 2.82/1.64  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.82/1.64  Main loop            : 0.17
% 2.82/1.64  Inferencing          : 0.06
% 2.82/1.64  Reduction            : 0.04
% 2.82/1.64  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 2.82/1.64  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.82/1.64  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 2.82/1.64  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.82/1.64  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.82/1.64  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.82/1.64  Total                : 0.64
% 2.82/1.64  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.82/1.65  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.82/1.65  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.82/1.65  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------