TSTP Solution File: SEU137+1 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : SEU137+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:57:09 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 69.69s 12.05s
% Output : Refutation 69.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 26
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 48 ( 19 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 104 ( 25 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 277 ( 25 ~; 5 |; 19 &; 190 @)
% ( 6 <=>; 32 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 9 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 79 ( 0 ^; 75 !; 4 ?; 79 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(subset_type,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(set_union2_type,type,
set_union2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(set_difference_type,type,
set_difference: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(empty_type,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(empty_set_type,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(21,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
= ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).
thf(133,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
= ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc3_xboole_0) ).
thf(102,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ A @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(96,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( subset @ A @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).
thf(105,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( subset @ A @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(32,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ( B
= ( set_union2 @ A @ ( set_difference @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t45_xboole_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ( B
= ( set_union2 @ A @ ( set_difference @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(22,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ( B
= ( set_union2 @ A @ ( set_difference @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ A )
<=> ( in @ C @ B ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_tarski) ).
thf(39,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( in @ C @ A )
=> ( in @ C @ B ) )
& ( ( in @ C @ B )
=> ( in @ C @ A ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
empty @ empty_set,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(35,plain,
empty @ empty_set,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ empty_set )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_boole) ).
thf(99,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ empty_set )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( empty @ A )
& ( A != B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).
thf(26,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( empty @ A )
& ( A != B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(20,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C
= ( set_difference @ A @ B ) )
<=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ C )
<=> ( ( in @ D @ A )
& ~ ( in @ D @ B ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_xboole_0) ).
thf(107,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C
= ( set_difference @ A @ B ) )
=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( in @ D @ C )
=> ( ( in @ D @ A )
& ~ ( in @ D @ B ) ) )
& ( ( ( in @ D @ A )
& ~ ( in @ D @ B ) )
=> ( in @ D @ C ) ) ) )
& ( ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( in @ D @ C )
=> ( ( in @ D @ A )
& ~ ( in @ D @ B ) ) )
& ( ( ( in @ D @ A )
& ~ ( in @ D @ B ) )
=> ( in @ D @ C ) ) )
=> ( C
= ( set_difference @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_difference @ empty_set @ A )
= empty_set ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_boole) ).
thf(93,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_difference @ empty_set @ A )
= empty_set ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C
= ( set_union2 @ A @ B ) )
<=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ C )
<=> ( ( in @ D @ A )
| ( in @ D @ B ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).
thf(57,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C
= ( set_union2 @ A @ B ) )
=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( in @ D @ C )
=> ( ( in @ D @ A )
| ( in @ D @ B ) ) )
& ( ( ( in @ D @ A )
| ( in @ D @ B ) )
=> ( in @ D @ C ) ) ) )
& ( ! [D: $i] :
( ( ( in @ D @ C )
=> ( ( in @ D @ A )
| ( in @ D @ B ) ) )
& ( ( ( in @ D @ A )
| ( in @ D @ B ) )
=> ( in @ D @ C ) ) )
=> ( C
= ( set_union2 @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).
thf(54,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(49,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( in @ A @ B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).
thf(36,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( in @ A @ B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(30,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).
thf(51,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_difference @ A @ empty_set )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_boole) ).
thf(90,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_difference @ A @ empty_set )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ A )
=> ( in @ C @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).
thf(83,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ A )
=> ( in @ C @ B ) ) )
& ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ A )
=> ( in @ C @ B ) )
=> ( subset @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(45927,plain,
$false,
inference(cvc4,[status(thm)],[133,102,96,105,32,22,39,35,99,26,107,93,57,54,49,36,30,51,90,83]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SEU137+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.15 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:33:29 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.82/0.85 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.17/0.98 % [INFO] Parsing done (131ms).
% 1.17/0.99 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.72/1.18 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.72/1.19 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.72/1.19 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.86/1.25 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 22 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.86/1.29 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 19 axioms (removed 3 axioms).
% 1.86/1.31 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.12/1.32 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.12/1.32 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 69.69/12.05 % External prover 'cvc4' found a proof!
% 69.69/12.05 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 69.69/12.05 % Time passed: 11530ms (effective reasoning time: 11062ms)
% 69.69/12.05 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 69.69/12.05 % Axioms used in derivation (19): t1_boole, fc1_xboole_0, fc2_xboole_0, t6_boole, commutativity_k2_xboole_0, t2_tarski, t7_boole, d4_xboole_0, idempotence_k2_xboole_0, t3_boole, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, t4_boole, fc3_xboole_0, d2_xboole_0, d3_tarski, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t8_boole, rc1_xboole_0
% 69.69/12.05 % No. of inferences in proof: 42
% 69.69/12.05 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 11530 ms resp. 11062 ms w/o parsing
% 69.69/12.09 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 69.69/12.09 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------