TSTP Solution File: SEU137+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU137+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.35s 13.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 132 ( 39 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 145 ( 52 ~; 71 |; 14 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 105 ( 14 sgn 42 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X1)
& ~ in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d4_xboole_0) ).
fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = set_union2(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X1)
| in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d2_xboole_0) ).
fof(t45_xboole_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
=> X2 = set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t45_xboole_1) ).
fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> in(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_tarski) ).
fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).
fof(t1_boole,axiom,
! [X1] : set_union2(X1,empty_set) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t1_boole) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( in(X8,X5)
| ~ in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X6)
| ~ in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk3_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| ~ in(esk3_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk3_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( in(esk3_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk3_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk3_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| in(esk3_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_xboole_0])])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
| in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X6)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| ~ in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| ~ in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
=> X2 = set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t45_xboole_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( in(X4,X2)
| X1 != set_difference(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( in(X4,X1)
| X1 != set_union2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5) )
& ( in(esk2_2(X4,X5),X4)
| subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk2_2(X4,X5),X5)
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk7_0,esk8_0)
& esk8_0 != set_union2(esk7_0,set_difference(esk8_0,esk7_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( in(X4,X1)
| in(X4,X3)
| X1 != set_difference(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = set_union2(X2,X3)
| in(esk1_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)
| in(esk1_3(X2,X3,X1),X2)
| in(esk1_3(X2,X3,X1),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( X1 = set_union2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(esk1_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk1_3(X2,X3,X1),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk7_0,esk8_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X3,X4] : set_union2(X3,X4) = set_union2(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X2] : set_union2(X2,empty_set) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t1_boole]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( X1 = set_union2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(esk1_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk1_3(X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
| in(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( X1 = set_union2(X2,set_difference(X3,X4))
| in(esk1_3(X2,set_difference(X3,X4),X1),X2)
| in(esk1_3(X2,set_difference(X3,X4),X1),X1)
| in(esk1_3(X2,set_difference(X3,X4),X1),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( X1 = set_union2(set_union2(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ in(esk1_3(set_union2(X2,X3),X4,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk1_3(set_union2(X2,X3),X4,X1),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk8_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk7_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
set_union2(X1,empty_set) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( X1 = set_union2(X2,set_difference(X3,X4))
| in(esk1_3(X2,set_difference(X3,X4),X1),X4)
| ~ in(esk1_3(X2,set_difference(X3,X4),X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk1_3(X2,set_difference(X3,X4),X1),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) = X2
| in(esk1_3(X1,set_difference(X2,X3),X2),X2)
| in(esk1_3(X1,set_difference(X2,X3),X2),X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( set_union2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = esk8_0
| ~ in(esk1_3(set_union2(X1,X2),X3,esk8_0),esk7_0)
| ~ in(esk1_3(set_union2(X1,X2),X3,esk8_0),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
set_union2(empty_set,X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) = X2
| in(esk1_3(X1,set_difference(X2,X3),X2),X1)
| in(esk1_3(X1,set_difference(X2,X3),X2),X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( set_union2(X1,X2) = esk8_0
| ~ in(esk1_3(X1,X2,esk8_0),esk7_0)
| ~ in(esk1_3(X1,X2,esk8_0),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)) = X2
| in(esk1_3(X1,set_difference(X2,X1),X2),X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
esk8_0 != set_union2(esk7_0,set_difference(esk8_0,esk7_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk1_3(esk7_0,set_difference(esk8_0,esk7_0),esk8_0),esk7_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SEU137+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 22:33:40 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.35/13.53 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.35/13.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.35/13.53
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof found!
% 0.35/13.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.35/13.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object total steps : 39
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object clause steps : 26
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object generating inferences : 15
% 0.35/13.53 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.35/13.53 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.35/13.53 # Parsed axioms : 23
% 0.35/13.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.35/13.53 # Initial clauses : 37
% 0.35/13.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.35/13.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 34
% 0.35/13.53 # Processed clauses : 35771
% 0.35/13.53 # ...of these trivial : 613
% 0.35/13.53 # ...subsumed : 29570
% 0.35/13.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 5588
% 0.35/13.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 81
% 0.35/13.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 602791
% 0.35/13.53 # Backward-subsumed : 120
% 0.35/13.53 # Backward-rewritten : 315
% 0.35/13.53 # Generated clauses : 846913
% 0.35/13.53 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 783186
% 0.35/13.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 8036
% 0.35/13.53 # Paramodulations : 841220
% 0.35/13.53 # Factorizations : 4458
% 0.35/13.53 # Equation resolutions : 566
% 0.35/13.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 4884
% 0.35/13.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 516
% 0.35/13.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.35/13.54 # Negative unit clauses : 171
% 0.35/13.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 4196
% 0.35/13.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 130173
% 0.35/13.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 371704
% 0.35/13.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.35/13.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 441
% 0.35/13.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5870639
% 0.35/13.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3492500
% 0.35/13.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 23358
% 0.35/13.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 553424
% 0.35/13.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.35/13.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3867
% 0.35/13.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 224
% 0.35/13.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.35/13.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.35/13.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 16542187
% 0.35/13.54
% 0.35/13.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/13.54 # User time : 12.505 s
% 0.35/13.54 # System time : 0.118 s
% 0.35/13.54 # Total time : 12.623 s
% 0.35/13.54 # Maximum resident set size: 141260 pages
% 0.35/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.35/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.35/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.35/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.48 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.35/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.35/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------