TSTP Solution File: SEU135+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU135+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 22.69s 4.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 22.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  11 unt;  13 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   95 (  18 equ;  41 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  114 (  14 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != set_union2(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != set_union2(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | X4 != set_union2(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_15,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_27,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | X2 != set_difference(X4,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_difference(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_29) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_73,lemma,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_73) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_75,lemma,
    ( subset(set_union2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ subset(X2,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_75) ).

cnf(i_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0)) != set_union2(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pva962jw/input.p',i_0_62) ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != set_union2(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != set_union2(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | X4 != set_union2(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_88]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | X2 != set_difference(X4,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_89]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_90]) ).

cnf(c_0_96,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    ( subset(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(esk3_2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]) ).

cnf(c_0_98,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    ( subset(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(esk3_2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | in(esk3_2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3),X2)
    | subset(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(X1,set_union2(X2,set_difference(X3,X4))),X4)
    | subset(X1,set_union2(X2,set_difference(X3,X4)))
    | ~ in(esk3_2(X1,set_union2(X2,set_difference(X3,X4))),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_98]) ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(set_union2(X1,X2),set_union2(X2,X3)),X1)
    | subset(set_union2(X1,X2),set_union2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_100]) ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_difference(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(set_union2(X1,X2),set_union2(X2,set_difference(X1,X3))),X3)
    | subset(set_union2(X1,X2),set_union2(X2,set_difference(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_102]) ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_103]) ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    subset(set_union2(X1,X2),set_union2(X2,set_difference(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_104]) ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(set_difference(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_96]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,lemma,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    i_0_73 ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)) = set_union2(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)),set_union2(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_107]) ).

cnf(c_0_112,lemma,
    ( subset(set_union2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ subset(X2,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_75 ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    subset(set_difference(X1,X2),set_union2(X1,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_108]) ).

cnf(c_0_114,lemma,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]) ).

cnf(c_0_115,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0)) != set_union2(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    i_0_62 ).

cnf(c_0_116,lemma,
    set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_112]),c_0_113]),c_0_114])]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_116]),c_0_110])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SEU135+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 23:50:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 22.69/4.27  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by Enigma+tptp-cade20-model03-h2e15+lgb-t150-d60-l8000-e0.15+coop-eprover73:
% 22.69/4.27  # ENIGMA: LightGBM model '/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/data/Enigma/tptp-cade20-model03-h2e15/lgb-t150-d60-l8000-e0.15/model.lgb' loaded. (hash_base: 32768; conj_feats: 23; version: 991; iters: 150)
% 22.69/4.27  # Preprocessing time       : 1.219 s
% 22.69/4.27  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 22.69/4.27  
% 22.69/4.27  # Proof found!
% 22.69/4.27  # SZS status Theorem
% 22.69/4.27  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 22.69/4.27  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 22.69/4.27  
% 22.69/4.27  # -------------------------------------------------
% 22.69/4.27  # User time                : 1.831 s
% 22.69/4.27  # System time              : 0.145 s
% 22.69/4.27  # Total time               : 1.976 s
% 22.69/4.27  # ...preprocessing         : 1.219 s
% 22.69/4.27  # ...main loop             : 0.757 s
% 22.69/4.27  # Maximum resident set size: 185056 pages
% 22.69/4.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------