TSTP Solution File: SEU134+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU134+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:42 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.93s 1.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  14 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  14   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (;  16   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > empty > set_difference > #nlpp > empty_set > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(set_difference,type,
    set_difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ? [A] : empty(A),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_61,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( empty(A)
     => ( A = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).

tff(f_70,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( set_difference(A,B) = empty_set )
    <=> subset(A,B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l32_xboole_1) ).

tff(f_66,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( ( set_difference(A,B) = empty_set )
      <=> subset(A,B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    empty('#skF_1'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_47,plain,
    ! [A_16] :
      ( ( empty_set = A_16 )
      | ~ empty(A_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_61]) ).

tff(c_54,plain,
    empty_set = '#skF_1',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_47]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [A_12,B_13] :
      ( subset(A_12,B_13)
      | ( set_difference(A_12,B_13) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_70]) ).

tff(c_107,plain,
    ! [A_26,B_27] :
      ( subset(A_26,B_27)
      | ( set_difference(A_26,B_27) != '#skF_1' ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_54,c_34]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ( subset('#skF_3','#skF_4')
    | ~ subset('#skF_5','#skF_6') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_79,plain,
    ~ subset('#skF_5','#skF_6'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_28]) ).

tff(c_111,plain,
    set_difference('#skF_5','#skF_6') != '#skF_1',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_79]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ( subset('#skF_3','#skF_4')
    | ( set_difference('#skF_5','#skF_6') = empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_122,plain,
    ( subset('#skF_3','#skF_4')
    | ( set_difference('#skF_5','#skF_6') = '#skF_1' ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_54,c_32]) ).

tff(c_123,plain,
    subset('#skF_3','#skF_4'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_122]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [A_12,B_13] :
      ( ( set_difference(A_12,B_13) = empty_set )
      | ~ subset(A_12,B_13) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_70]) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    ! [A_12,B_13] :
      ( ( set_difference(A_12,B_13) = '#skF_1' )
      | ~ subset(A_12,B_13) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_54,c_36]) ).

tff(c_127,plain,
    set_difference('#skF_3','#skF_4') = '#skF_1',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_112]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ( ( set_difference('#skF_3','#skF_4') != empty_set )
    | ( set_difference('#skF_5','#skF_6') = empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_158,plain,
    set_difference('#skF_5','#skF_6') = '#skF_1',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_54,c_127,c_54,c_30]) ).

tff(c_159,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_158]) ).

tff(c_161,plain,
    subset('#skF_5','#skF_6'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_28]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ( ( set_difference('#skF_3','#skF_4') != empty_set )
    | ~ subset('#skF_5','#skF_6') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_188,plain,
    set_difference('#skF_3','#skF_4') != '#skF_1',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_161,c_54,c_26]) ).

tff(c_160,plain,
    subset('#skF_3','#skF_4'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_28]) ).

tff(c_193,plain,
    ! [A_40,B_41] :
      ( ( set_difference(A_40,B_41) = '#skF_1' )
      | ~ subset(A_40,B_41) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_54,c_36]) ).

tff(c_202,plain,
    set_difference('#skF_3','#skF_4') = '#skF_1',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_193]) ).

tff(c_211,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_188,c_202]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SEU134+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:06:22 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.93/1.81  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.93/1.82  
% 2.93/1.82  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.16/1.84  
% 3.16/1.84  Inference rules
% 3.16/1.84  ----------------------
% 3.16/1.84  #Ref     : 0
% 3.16/1.84  #Sup     : 35
% 3.16/1.84  #Fact    : 0
% 3.16/1.84  #Define  : 0
% 3.16/1.84  #Split   : 1
% 3.16/1.84  #Chain   : 0
% 3.16/1.84  #Close   : 0
% 3.16/1.84  
% 3.16/1.84  Ordering : KBO
% 3.16/1.84  
% 3.16/1.84  Simplification rules
% 3.16/1.84  ----------------------
% 3.16/1.84  #Subsume      : 3
% 3.16/1.84  #Demod        : 19
% 3.16/1.84  #Tautology    : 30
% 3.16/1.84  #SimpNegUnit  : 3
% 3.16/1.84  #BackRed      : 3
% 3.16/1.84  
% 3.16/1.84  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.16/1.84  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.16/1.84  
% 3.16/1.84  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.16/1.84  ----------------------
% 3.16/1.85  Preprocessing        : 0.46
% 3.16/1.85  Parsing              : 0.25
% 3.16/1.85  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.16/1.85  Main loop            : 0.26
% 3.16/1.85  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.16/1.85  Reduction            : 0.07
% 3.16/1.85  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 3.16/1.85  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 3.16/1.85  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.16/1.85  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.16/1.85  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.16/1.85  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.16/1.85  Total                : 0.76
% 3.16/1.85  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.16/1.85  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.16/1.85  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.16/1.85  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------