TSTP Solution File: SEU133+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SEU133+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 01:12:53 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.88s
% Output   : Solution 0.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17089/SEU133+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17089/SEU133+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17089/SEU133+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 17185
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.012 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(subset(X1,X2)<=>![X3]:(in(X3,X1)=>in(X3,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d3_tarski)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(X3=set_difference(X1,X2)<=>![X4]:(in(X4,X3)<=>(in(X4,X1)&~(in(X4,X2))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d4_xboole_0)).
% fof(15, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t36_xboole_1)).
% fof(16, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[15])).
% fof(18, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(X3=set_difference(X1,X2)<=>![X4]:(in(X4,X3)<=>(in(X4,X1)&~(in(X4,X2))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[4,theory(equality)])).
% fof(22, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(subset(X1,X2))|![X3]:(~(in(X3,X1))|in(X3,X2)))&(?[X3]:(in(X3,X1)&~(in(X3,X2)))|subset(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(23, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(in(X6,X4))|in(X6,X5)))&(?[X7]:(in(X7,X4)&~(in(X7,X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(in(X6,X4))|in(X6,X5)))&((in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[23])).
% fof(25, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(in(X6,X4))|in(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(26, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(in(X6,X4))|in(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)|subset(X4,X5))&(~(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|subset(X4,X5)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[25])).
% cnf(27,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|~in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% cnf(28,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% fof(33, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(X3=set_difference(X1,X2))|![X4]:((~(in(X4,X3))|(in(X4,X1)&~(in(X4,X2))))&((~(in(X4,X1))|in(X4,X2))|in(X4,X3))))&(?[X4]:((~(in(X4,X3))|(~(in(X4,X1))|in(X4,X2)))&(in(X4,X3)|(in(X4,X1)&~(in(X4,X2)))))|X3=set_difference(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(34, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:((~(X7=set_difference(X5,X6))|![X8]:((~(in(X8,X7))|(in(X8,X5)&~(in(X8,X6))))&((~(in(X8,X5))|in(X8,X6))|in(X8,X7))))&(?[X9]:((~(in(X9,X7))|(~(in(X9,X5))|in(X9,X6)))&(in(X9,X7)|(in(X9,X5)&~(in(X9,X6)))))|X7=set_difference(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[33])).
% fof(35, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:((~(X7=set_difference(X5,X6))|![X8]:((~(in(X8,X7))|(in(X8,X5)&~(in(X8,X6))))&((~(in(X8,X5))|in(X8,X6))|in(X8,X7))))&(((~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7))|(~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X5))|in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)))&(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)|(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)&~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)))))|X7=set_difference(X5,X6))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[34])).
% fof(36, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:((((~(in(X8,X7))|(in(X8,X5)&~(in(X8,X6))))&((~(in(X8,X5))|in(X8,X6))|in(X8,X7)))|~(X7=set_difference(X5,X6)))&(((~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7))|(~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X5))|in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)))&(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)|(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)&~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)))))|X7=set_difference(X5,X6))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[35])).
% fof(37, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:(((((in(X8,X5)|~(in(X8,X7)))|~(X7=set_difference(X5,X6)))&((~(in(X8,X6))|~(in(X8,X7)))|~(X7=set_difference(X5,X6))))&(((~(in(X8,X5))|in(X8,X6))|in(X8,X7))|~(X7=set_difference(X5,X6))))&(((~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7))|(~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X5))|in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)))|X7=set_difference(X5,X6))&(((in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)|in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7))|X7=set_difference(X5,X6))&((~(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X6))|in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7))|X7=set_difference(X5,X6))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[36])).
% cnf(43,plain,(in(X4,X2)|X1!=set_difference(X2,X3)|~in(X4,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[37])).
% fof(66, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:~(subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[16])).
% fof(67, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:?[X4]:~(subset(set_difference(X3,X4),X3)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[66])).
% fof(68, negated_conjecture,~(subset(set_difference(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk5_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[67])).
% cnf(69,negated_conjecture,(~subset(set_difference(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk5_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[68])).
% cnf(77,plain,(in(X1,X2)|~in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))),inference(er,[status(thm)],[43,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(139,plain,(in(esk1_2(set_difference(X1,X2),X3),X1)|subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X3)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[77,28,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(204,plain,(subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[27,139,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(238,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[69,204,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(239,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[238,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(240,negated_conjecture,($false),239,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 77
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 12
% # ...remaining for further processing: 65
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 4
% # Generated clauses                  : 131
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 99
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 2
% # Paramodulations                    : 123
% # Factorizations                     : 2
% # Equation resolutions               : 6
% # Current number of processed clauses: 41
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 8
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 6
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 27
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 57
% # ...number of literals in the above : 163
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 91
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 79
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 10
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 3
% # Backwards rewriting index:    29 leaves,   1.66+/-1.294 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           12 leaves,   1.42+/-0.862 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           28 leaves,   1.50+/-1.018 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.016 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.019 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17089/SEU133+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------