TSTP Solution File: SEU133+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SEU133+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:14:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.75s 1.93s
% Output   : Refutation 1.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   6 unt;   1 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   2 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | ~ in(dollar_f1(A,B),B) ),
    file('SEU133+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( A != set_difference(B,C)
    | ~ in(D,A)
    | in(D,B) ),
    file('SEU133+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ~ subset(set_difference(dollar_c4,dollar_c3),dollar_c4),
    file('SEU133+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SEU133+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | in(dollar_f1(A,B),A) ),
    file('SEU133+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(43,plain,
    in(dollar_f1(set_difference(dollar_c4,dollar_c3),dollar_c4),set_difference(dollar_c4,dollar_c3)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[20,10]),
    [iquote('hyper,20,10')] ).

cnf(331,plain,
    in(dollar_f1(set_difference(dollar_c4,dollar_c3),dollar_c4),dollar_c4),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[43,4,19]),
    [iquote('hyper,43,4,19')] ).

cnf(425,plain,
    subset(set_difference(dollar_c4,dollar_c3),dollar_c4),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[331,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,331,3')] ).

cnf(426,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[425,10]),
    [iquote('binary,425.1,10.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU133+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 07:44:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.67/1.89  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.67/1.89  The process was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 1.67/1.89  Wed Jul 27 07:44:05 2022
% 1.67/1.89  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 2020.
% 1.67/1.89  
% 1.67/1.89  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.67/1.89  set(auto).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.67/1.89  clear(print_given).
% 1.67/1.89  
% 1.67/1.89  formula_list(usable).
% 1.67/1.89  all A (A=A).
% 1.67/1.89  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 1.67/1.89  all A B (subset(A,B)<-> (all C (in(C,A)->in(C,B)))).
% 1.67/1.89  all A B C (C=set_difference(A,B)<-> (all D (in(D,C)<->in(D,A)& -in(D,B)))).
% 1.67/1.89  $T.
% 1.67/1.89  $T.
% 1.67/1.89  empty(empty_set).
% 1.67/1.89  exists A empty(A).
% 1.67/1.89  exists A (-empty(A)).
% 1.67/1.89  all A B subset(A,A).
% 1.67/1.89  -(all A B subset(set_difference(A,B),A)).
% 1.67/1.89  all A (set_difference(A,empty_set)=A).
% 1.67/1.89  all A (set_difference(empty_set,A)=empty_set).
% 1.67/1.89  all A (empty(A)->A=empty_set).
% 1.67/1.89  all A B (-(in(A,B)&empty(B))).
% 1.67/1.89  all A B (-(empty(A)&A!=B&empty(B))).
% 1.67/1.89  end_of_list.
% 1.67/1.89  
% 1.67/1.89  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.67/1.89  
% 1.67/1.89  list(usable).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] A=A.
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] -subset(A,B)| -in(C,A)|in(C,B).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] subset(A,B)|in($f1(A,B),A).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] subset(A,B)| -in($f1(A,B),B).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] C!=set_difference(A,B)| -in(D,C)|in(D,A).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] C!=set_difference(A,B)| -in(D,C)| -in(D,B).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] C!=set_difference(A,B)|in(D,C)| -in(D,A)|in(D,B).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] C=set_difference(A,B)|in($f2(A,B,C),C)|in($f2(A,B,C),A).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] C=set_difference(A,B)|in($f2(A,B,C),C)| -in($f2(A,B,C),B).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] C=set_difference(A,B)| -in($f2(A,B,C),C)| -in($f2(A,B,C),A)|in($f2(A,B,C),B).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] $T.
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] $T.
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] empty($c1).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] -subset(set_difference($c4,$c3),$c4).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] set_difference(A,empty_set)=A.
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] set_difference(empty_set,A)=empty_set.
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] -empty(A)|A=empty_set.
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] -in(A,B)| -empty(B).
% 1.67/1.89  0 [] -empty(A)|A=B| -empty(B).
% 1.67/1.89  end_of_list.
% 1.67/1.89  
% 1.67/1.89  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.67/1.89  
% 1.67/1.89  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.67/1.89  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.67/1.89  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.67/1.89  clauses in usable.
% 1.67/1.89  
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.67/1.89     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.67/1.89  
% 1.67/1.89  ------------> process usable:
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 2 [] -subset(A,B)| -in(C,A)|in(C,B).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] subset(A,B)| -in($f1(A,B),B).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 4 [] A!=set_difference(B,C)| -in(D,A)|in(D,B).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 5 [] A!=set_difference(B,C)| -in(D,A)| -in(D,C).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 6 [] A!=set_difference(B,C)|in(D,A)| -in(D,B)|in(D,C).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 7 [] A=set_difference(B,C)|in($f2(B,C,A),A)| -in($f2(B,C,A),C).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=23): 8 [] A=set_difference(B,C)| -in($f2(B,C,A),A)| -in($f2(B,C,A),B)|in($f2(B,C,A),C).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 9 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 10 [] -subset(set_difference($c4,$c3),$c4).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 11 [] -empty(A)|A=empty_set.
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 12 [] -in(A,B)| -empty(B).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 13 [] -empty(A)|A=B| -empty(B).
% 1.67/1.89  
% 1.67/1.89  ------------> process sos:
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 19 [] A=A.
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 20 [] subset(A,B)|in($f1(A,B),A).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 21 [] A=set_difference(B,C)|in($f2(B,C,A),A)|in($f2(B,C,A),B).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 22 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 23 [] empty($c1).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 24 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.67/1.89  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 25 [] set_difference(A,empty_set)=A.
% 1.67/1.89  ---> New Demodulator: 26 [new_demod,25] set_difference(A,empty_set)=A.
% 1.75/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 27 [] set_difference(empty_set,A)=empty_set.
% 1.75/1.93  ---> New Demodulator: 28 [new_demod,27] set_difference(empty_set,A)=empty_set.
% 1.75/1.93    Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [copy,19,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.75/1.93  19 back subsumes 18.
% 1.75/1.93  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 26.
% 1.75/1.93  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 28.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.04 sec ----> 426 [binary,425.1,10.1] $F.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.75/1.93  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.75/1.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.75/1.93  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ============ end of search ============
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.75/1.93  clauses given                 27
% 1.75/1.93  clauses generated            783
% 1.75/1.93  clauses kept                 420
% 1.75/1.93  clauses forward subsumed     362
% 1.75/1.93  clauses back subsumed         22
% 1.75/1.93  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.75/1.93  user CPU time          0.04          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.93  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.93  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.75/1.93  
% 1.75/1.93  Process 2020 finished Wed Jul 27 07:44:07 2022
% 1.75/1.93  Otter interrupted
% 1.75/1.93  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------