TSTP Solution File: SEU133+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU133+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:42 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.47s 2.12s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   4 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   5   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   15 (   7   >;   8   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (;  21   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > empty > set_difference > #nlpp > empty_set > #skF_7 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_4 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(set_difference,type,
    set_difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_38,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,A)
         => in(C,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

tff(f_48,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( C = set_difference(A,B) )
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,A)
            & ~ in(D,B) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_60,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] : subset(set_difference(A,B),A),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t36_xboole_1) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [A_3,B_4] :
      ( in('#skF_1'(A_3,B_4),A_3)
      | subset(A_3,B_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_155,plain,
    ! [D_42,A_43,B_44] :
      ( in(D_42,A_43)
      | ~ in(D_42,set_difference(A_43,B_44)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_898,plain,
    ! [A_135,B_136,B_137] :
      ( in('#skF_1'(set_difference(A_135,B_136),B_137),A_135)
      | subset(set_difference(A_135,B_136),B_137) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_155]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_3,B_4] :
      ( ~ in('#skF_1'(A_3,B_4),B_4)
      | subset(A_3,B_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_956,plain,
    ! [A_135,B_136] : subset(set_difference(A_135,B_136),A_135),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_898,c_6]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ~ subset(set_difference('#skF_6','#skF_7'),'#skF_6'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_964,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_956,c_40]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU133+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:43:14 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.47/2.12  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/2.12  
% 3.69/2.12  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.69/2.15  
% 3.69/2.15  Inference rules
% 3.69/2.15  ----------------------
% 3.69/2.15  #Ref     : 0
% 3.69/2.15  #Sup     : 199
% 3.69/2.15  #Fact    : 0
% 3.69/2.15  #Define  : 0
% 3.69/2.15  #Split   : 0
% 3.69/2.15  #Chain   : 0
% 3.69/2.15  #Close   : 0
% 3.69/2.15  
% 3.69/2.15  Ordering : KBO
% 3.69/2.15  
% 3.69/2.15  Simplification rules
% 3.69/2.15  ----------------------
% 3.69/2.15  #Subsume      : 30
% 3.69/2.15  #Demod        : 47
% 3.69/2.15  #Tautology    : 58
% 3.69/2.15  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.69/2.15  #BackRed      : 7
% 3.69/2.15  
% 3.69/2.15  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.69/2.15  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.69/2.15  
% 3.69/2.15  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.69/2.15  ----------------------
% 3.69/2.15  Preprocessing        : 0.52
% 3.69/2.15  Parsing              : 0.27
% 3.69/2.15  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.69/2.15  Main loop            : 0.52
% 3.69/2.15  Inferencing          : 0.21
% 3.69/2.15  Reduction            : 0.13
% 3.69/2.15  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 3.69/2.15  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.69/2.15  Subsumption          : 0.12
% 3.69/2.15  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.69/2.15  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.69/2.15  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.69/2.15  Total                : 1.08
% 3.69/2.15  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.69/2.15  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.69/2.15  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.69/2.15  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------