TSTP Solution File: SEU130+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SEU130+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.m0w0aqbiWy true
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 19:10:37 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.43s 0.82s
% Output : Refutation 1.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 6 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 14 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 185 ( 18 ~; 19 |; 1 &; 141 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 9 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 ^; 25 !; 0 ?; 25 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__4_type,type,
sk__4: $i ).
thf(subset_type,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(set_intersection2_type,type,
set_intersection2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__5_type,type,
sk__5: $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__1_type,type,
sk__1: $i > $i > $i > $i ).
thf(t28_xboole_1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ( ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B )
= A ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ( ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B )
= A ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t28_xboole_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl22,plain,
subset @ sk__4 @ sk__5,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(d3_tarski,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ A )
=> ( in @ C @ B ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( in @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( subset @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d3_tarski]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl133,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X0 @ sk__4 )
| ( in @ X0 @ sk__5 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl22,zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C
= ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B ) )
<=> ! [D: $i] :
( ( in @ D @ C )
<=> ( ( in @ D @ A )
& ( in @ D @ B ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X2
= ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X1 )
| ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X0 )
| ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d3_xboole_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl263,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X1 @ sk__5 @ X0 ) @ sk__4 )
| ( X1
= ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ sk__5 ) )
| ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X1 @ sk__5 @ X0 ) @ X0 )
| ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X1 @ sk__5 @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl133,zip_derived_cl11]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl290,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X0 @ sk__5 @ sk__4 ) @ X0 )
| ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X0 @ sk__5 @ sk__4 ) @ sk__4 )
| ( X0
= ( set_intersection2 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 ) ) ),
inference(eq_fact,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl263]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl461,plain,
( ( sk__4
= ( set_intersection2 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 ) )
| ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 @ sk__4 ) @ sk__4 ) ),
inference(eq_fact,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl290]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl23,plain,
( ( set_intersection2 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 )
!= sk__4 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl462,plain,
~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 @ sk__4 ) @ sk__4 ),
inference('simplify_reflect-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl461,zip_derived_cl23]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl13,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X2
= ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ X1 ) )
| ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X0 )
| ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d3_xboole_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl290_001,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X0 @ sk__5 @ sk__4 ) @ X0 )
| ~ ( in @ ( sk__1 @ X0 @ sk__5 @ sk__4 ) @ sk__4 )
| ( X0
= ( set_intersection2 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 ) ) ),
inference(eq_fact,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl263]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl454,plain,
( ( in @ ( sk__1 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 @ sk__4 ) @ sk__4 )
| ( sk__4
= ( set_intersection2 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 ) )
| ( sk__4
= ( set_intersection2 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl13,zip_derived_cl290]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl465,plain,
( ( sk__4
= ( set_intersection2 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 ) )
| ( in @ ( sk__1 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 @ sk__4 ) @ sk__4 ) ),
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl454]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl23_002,plain,
( ( set_intersection2 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 )
!= sk__4 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl466,plain,
in @ ( sk__1 @ sk__4 @ sk__5 @ sk__4 ) @ sk__4,
inference('simplify_reflect-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl465,zip_derived_cl23]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl497,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl462,zip_derived_cl466]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SEU130+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.m0w0aqbiWy true
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 20:25:23 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.22/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.43/0.82 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.43/0.82 % BCE start: 28
% 1.43/0.82 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.43/0.82 % PE start: 28
% 1.43/0.82 logic: eq
% 1.43/0.82 % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.43/0.82 % done 128 iterations in 0.079s
% 1.43/0.82 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.43/0.82 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.43/0.82
% 1.43/0.82
% 1.43/0.82 % Terminating...
% 1.56/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.56/0.89 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------