TSTP Solution File: SEU124+2 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SEU124+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 13:29:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.28s 1.53s
% Output   : Refutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SEU124+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 10:06:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/1.00  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/1.00  Process 3120 was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/1.00  Mon Jun 20 10:06:53 2022
% 0.43/1.00  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_2967_n008.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_2967_n008.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/1.00  set(auto2).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/1.00      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/1.00      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/1.00  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/1.00  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/1.00  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/1.00  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/1.00  clear(print_given).
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (31 formulas)
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/1.00  
% 0.43/1.00  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/1.00  1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  2 (all A all B set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  3 (all A all B set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  4 (all A all B (A = B <-> subset(A,B) & subset(B,A))) # label(d10_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  5 (all A (A = empty_set <-> (all B -in(B,A)))) # label(d1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  6 (all A all B all C (C = set_union2(A,B) <-> (all D (in(D,C) <-> in(D,A) | in(D,B))))) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  7 (all A all B (subset(A,B) <-> (all C (in(C,A) -> in(C,B))))) # label(d3_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  8 (all A all B all C (C = set_intersection2(A,B) <-> (all D (in(D,C) <-> in(D,A) & in(D,B))))) # label(d3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  9 (all A all B (disjoint(A,B) <-> set_intersection2(A,B) = empty_set)) # label(d7_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  10 $T # label(dt_k1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  11 $T # label(dt_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  12 $T # label(dt_k3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  13 (all A all B (-empty(A) -> -empty(set_union2(A,B)))) # label(fc2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  14 (all A all B (-empty(A) -> -empty(set_union2(B,A)))) # label(fc3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  15 (all A all B set_union2(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.00  16 (all A all B set_intersection2(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence_k3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  17 (exists A empty(A)) # label(rc1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  18 (exists A -empty(A)) # label(rc2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  19 (all A all B subset(A,A)) # label(reflexivity_r1_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  20 (all A all B (disjoint(A,B) -> disjoint(B,A))) # label(symmetry_r1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  21 (all A set_union2(A,empty_set) = A) # label(t1_boole) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  22 (all A all B all C (subset(A,B) & subset(B,C) -> subset(A,C))) # label(t1_xboole_1) # label(lemma) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  23 (all A subset(empty_set,A)) # label(t2_xboole_1) # label(lemma) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  24 (all A all B (-(-disjoint(A,B) & (all C -(in(C,A) & in(C,B)))) & -((exists C (in(C,A) & in(C,B))) & disjoint(A,B)))) # label(t3_xboole_0) # label(lemma) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  25 (all A (subset(A,empty_set) -> A = empty_set)) # label(t3_xboole_1) # label(lemma) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  26 (all A all B (-(-disjoint(A,B) & (all C -in(C,set_intersection2(A,B)))) & -((exists C in(C,set_intersection2(A,B))) & disjoint(A,B)))) # label(t4_xboole_0) # label(lemma) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  27 (all A (empty(A) -> A = empty_set)) # label(t6_boole) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  28 (all A all B -(in(A,B) & empty(B))) # label(t7_boole) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  29 (all A all B -(empty(A) & A != B & empty(B))) # label(t8_boole) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  30 -(all A all B subset(A,set_union2(A,B))) # label(t7_xboole_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.52  
% 1.28/1.52  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 1.28/1.52  
% 1.28/1.52  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 1.28/1.52  
% 1.28/1.52  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 1.28/1.52  
% 1.28/1.52  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  Term ordering decisions:
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  % Assigning unary symbol f1 kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (18).
% 1.28/1.53  Function symbol KB weights:  empty_set=1. c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. set_intersection2=1. set_union2=1. f3=1. f5=1. f6=1. f2=1. f4=1. f1=0.
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3376
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3349
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  Low Water (keep): wt=17.000, iters=3339
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3337
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 1.28/1.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.28/1.53  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  % Proof 1 at 0.52 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 1.28/1.53  % Length of proof is 13.
% 1.28/1.53  % Level of proof is 4.
% 1.28/1.53  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 1.28/1.53  % Given clauses 367.
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  2 (all A all B set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.53  6 (all A all B all C (C = set_union2(A,B) <-> (all D (in(D,C) <-> in(D,A) | in(D,B))))) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.53  7 (all A all B (subset(A,B) <-> (all C (in(C,A) -> in(C,B))))) # label(d3_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.53  30 -(all A all B subset(A,set_union2(A,B))) # label(t7_xboole_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.28/1.53  38 set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A) # label(commutativity_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 1.28/1.53  41 subset(A,B) | in(f3(A,B),A) # label(d3_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 1.28/1.53  50 -subset(c3,set_union2(c3,c4)) # label(t7_xboole_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(30)].
% 1.28/1.53  63 subset(A,B) | -in(f3(A,B),B) # label(d3_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 1.28/1.53  70 set_union2(A,B) != C | in(D,C) | -in(D,B) # label(d2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 1.28/1.53  104 in(f3(c3,set_union2(c3,c4)),c3).  [resolve(50,a,41,a)].
% 1.28/1.53  141 -in(f3(c3,set_union2(c3,c4)),set_union2(c3,c4)).  [ur(63,a,50,a)].
% 1.28/1.53  6127 set_union2(c3,c4) != set_union2(A,c3).  [ur(70,b,141,a,c,104,a),flip(a)].
% 1.28/1.53  6128 $F.  [resolve(6127,a,38,a)].
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.28/1.53  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  Given=367. Generated=22594. Kept=6096. proofs=1.
% 1.28/1.53  Usable=343. Sos=5148. Demods=7. Limbo=14, Disabled=637. Hints=0.
% 1.28/1.53  Megabytes=4.86.
% 1.28/1.53  User_CPU=0.52, System_CPU=0.02, Wall_clock=0.
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  ============================== end of search =========================
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  THEOREM PROVED
% 1.28/1.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 1.28/1.53  
% 1.28/1.53  Process 3120 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jun 20 10:06:53 2022
% 1.28/1.53  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------